• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

剖析创新系统的绩效因素并研究德国通过数字健康应用(DiGAs)的市场准入途径促进患者作用的尝试:探索性混合方法研究。

Unpacking Performance Factors of Innovation Systems and Studying Germany's Attempt to Foster the Role of the Patient Through a Market Access Pathway for Digital Health Applications (DiGAs): Exploratory Mixed Methods Study.

作者信息

Gehder Sara, Goeldner Moritz

机构信息

Working Group for Data-Driven Innovation, Hamburg University of Technology, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 6;27:e66356. doi: 10.2196/66356.

DOI:10.2196/66356
PMID:39761562
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11747537/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health care innovation faces significant challenges, including system inertia and diverse stakeholders, making regulated market access pathways essential for facilitating the adoption of new technologies. The German Digital Healthcare Act, introduced in 2019, offers a model by enabling digital health applications (DiGAs) to be reimbursed by statutory health insurance, improving market access and patient empowerment. However, the factors influencing the success of these pathways in driving innovation remain unclear.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to identify the key performance factors of the innovation system shaped by the patient-relevant structural and procedural improvement (pSVV) pathway within the DiGA model. By examining how this pathway supports the entry of innovative digital health technologies, we seek to uncover the systemic dynamics that influence its effectiveness in fostering patient-centered digital health solutions.

METHODS

This study, conducted from May 2023 to November 2024, used a mixed methods approach. A descriptive analysis assessed how DiGA manufacturers use positive health care effects, giving a market overview of the pSVV technology. A qualitative analysis using grounded theory and Gioia methodology provided insights into stakeholder perspectives, focusing on manufacturers and regulatory bodies. A functional-structural analysis examined how components of the innovation system, such as actors, institutions, interactions, and infrastructure, interact and impact the effectiveness of the pathway.

RESULTS

The descriptive analysis showed that only 11 (20%) of the 56 DiGAs available in Germany used the pSVV pathway, with only 1 (2%) provisionally listed DiGA using pSVV as a primary end point; 6 of 9 (67%) pSVV key areas were used. The qualitative analysis revealed that manufacturers prioritize demonstrating medical benefits over pSVV due to evidence requirements and uncertainties around pSVV acceptance. Operational barriers hindered the adoption of pSVV, despite a positive reception among stakeholders. The systemic analysis identified key issues, including a lack of entrepreneurial focus on pSVV, limited regulatory experience, inadequate measurement methods, and entrenched practices prioritizing medical benefits, that hinder market formation and legitimacy.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identifies key factors for effectively implementing innovation systems through regulated market access pathways, including content and format security, clearer framework specification, active innovation process management, and market formation stimulation. Addressing these factors can reduce uncertainties and promote wider adoption of digital health technologies. The findings highlight the need for future research on patient empowerment and the development of methodologies beyond traditional therapeutic outcomes.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/645f/11747537/d411075cf511/jmir_v27i1e66356_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/645f/11747537/de996f577d6b/jmir_v27i1e66356_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/645f/11747537/4b5f9ce8e3ec/jmir_v27i1e66356_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/645f/11747537/4effc710fd1e/jmir_v27i1e66356_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/645f/11747537/02c1514816f7/jmir_v27i1e66356_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/645f/11747537/bf10bb07c570/jmir_v27i1e66356_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/645f/11747537/d411075cf511/jmir_v27i1e66356_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/645f/11747537/de996f577d6b/jmir_v27i1e66356_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/645f/11747537/4b5f9ce8e3ec/jmir_v27i1e66356_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/645f/11747537/4effc710fd1e/jmir_v27i1e66356_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/645f/11747537/02c1514816f7/jmir_v27i1e66356_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/645f/11747537/bf10bb07c570/jmir_v27i1e66356_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/645f/11747537/d411075cf511/jmir_v27i1e66356_fig6.jpg
摘要

背景

医疗保健创新面临重大挑战,包括系统惯性和利益相关者多元化,这使得规范的市场准入途径对于促进新技术的采用至关重要。2019年出台的德国数字医疗法案提供了一个模式,使数字健康应用程序(DiGAs)能够由法定医疗保险报销,改善了市场准入并增强了患者权能。然而,影响这些途径推动创新成功的因素仍不明确。

目的

本研究旨在确定由DiGA模型中与患者相关的结构和程序改进(pSVV)途径所塑造的创新系统的关键绩效因素。通过研究该途径如何支持创新数字健康技术的进入,我们试图揭示影响其在促进以患者为中心的数字健康解决方案方面有效性的系统动态。

方法

本研究于2023年5月至2024年11月进行,采用了混合方法。描述性分析评估了DiGA制造商如何利用积极的医疗保健效果,给出了pSVV技术的市场概况。使用扎根理论和乔亚方法的定性分析提供了利益相关者观点的见解,重点关注制造商和监管机构。功能结构分析研究了创新系统的组成部分,如行为者、机构、互动和基础设施,如何相互作用并影响该途径的有效性。

结果

描述性分析表明,德国现有的56种DiGAs中只有11种(20%)使用了pSVV途径,只有1种(2%)临时列出的DiGA将pSVV作为主要终点;9个pSVV关键领域中的6个被使用。定性分析表明,由于证据要求和pSVV接受度的不确定性,制造商将证明医疗益处置于pSVV之上的优先级更高。尽管利益相关者反应积极,但操作障碍阻碍了pSVV的采用。系统分析确定了关键问题,包括缺乏对pSVV的创业关注、监管经验有限、测量方法不足以及优先考虑医疗益处的根深蒂固的做法,这些都阻碍了市场形成和合法性。

结论

本研究确定了通过规范的市场准入途径有效实施创新系统的关键因素,包括内容和格式安全性、更清晰的框架规范、积极的创新过程管理以及刺激市场形成。解决这些因素可以减少不确定性并促进数字健康技术的更广泛采用。研究结果强调了未来对患者赋权以及超越传统治疗结果的方法学发展进行研究的必要性。

相似文献

1
Unpacking Performance Factors of Innovation Systems and Studying Germany's Attempt to Foster the Role of the Patient Through a Market Access Pathway for Digital Health Applications (DiGAs): Exploratory Mixed Methods Study.剖析创新系统的绩效因素并研究德国通过数字健康应用(DiGAs)的市场准入途径促进患者作用的尝试:探索性混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 6;27:e66356. doi: 10.2196/66356.
2
[Structural benefits on prescription? Exploring potentials and challenges of the pSVV concept in the approval process of digital health applications in Germany].[处方上的结构优势?探索德国数字健康应用程序审批过程中pSVV概念的潜力与挑战]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2025 Feb;192:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2024.11.003. Epub 2024 Dec 17.
3
Digital Health Applications (DiGAs) on a Fast Track: Insights From a Data-Driven Analysis of Prescribable Digital Therapeutics in Germany From 2020 to Mid-2024.数字健康应用(DiGAs)快速发展:2020 年至 2024 年年中德国可处方数字治疗药物的数据分析洞察。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 29;26:e59013. doi: 10.2196/59013.
4
Dynamic HTA for digital health solutions: opportunities and challenges for patient-centered evaluation.动态卫生技术评估在数字健康解决方案中的应用:以患者为中心的评估的机遇与挑战。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2023 Nov 17;39(1):e72. doi: 10.1017/S0266462323002726.
5
Back on track - digital health applications to treat back pain of rheumatic patients? Results of a qualitative interview study.重回正轨——数字健康应用程序用于治疗风湿病患者的背痛?一项定性访谈研究的结果
Rheumatol Int. 2024 Dec;44(12):2977-2987. doi: 10.1007/s00296-024-05726-x. Epub 2024 Sep 28.
6
Adoption and perception of prescribable digital health applications (DiGA) and the advancing digitalization among German internal medicine physicians: a cross-sectional survey study.德国内科医生对可处方数字健康应用程序(DiGA)的采用和认知,以及不断推进的数字化:一项横断面调查研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 6;24(1):1353. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11807-1.
7
Enhancing the Value of the BfArM's DiGA Directory: Strategies for Improved Usability and Stakeholder Satisfaction.提升 BfArM 数字健康应用程序目录的价值:提高可用性和利益相关者满意度的策略。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2024 Aug 22;316:320-324. doi: 10.3233/SHTI240408.
8
Market access and value-based pricing of digital health applications in Germany.德国数字健康应用的市场准入与基于价值的定价
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2022 Jun 13;20(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12962-022-00359-y.
9
Integration of digital health applications into the German healthcare system: development of "The DiGA-Care Path".将数字健康应用整合到德国医疗体系:“数字健康应用护理路径”的开发
Front Health Serv. 2024 Mar 13;4:1372522. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1372522. eCollection 2024.
10
[Digital health applications (DiGA) in the area of tension between progress and criticism : Discussion paper from the "Digital health" specialist group of the German Informatics Society].[进展与批评之间张力领域的数字健康应用(DiGA):德国信息学协会“数字健康”专家组的讨论文件]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2024 Jan;67(1):107-114. doi: 10.1007/s00103-023-03804-2. Epub 2023 Dec 12.

本文引用的文献

1
[Structural benefits on prescription? Exploring potentials and challenges of the pSVV concept in the approval process of digital health applications in Germany].[处方上的结构优势?探索德国数字健康应用程序审批过程中pSVV概念的潜力与挑战]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2025 Feb;192:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2024.11.003. Epub 2024 Dec 17.
2
Digital Health Applications (DiGAs) on a Fast Track: Insights From a Data-Driven Analysis of Prescribable Digital Therapeutics in Germany From 2020 to Mid-2024.数字健康应用(DiGAs)快速发展:2020 年至 2024 年年中德国可处方数字治疗药物的数据分析洞察。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 29;26:e59013. doi: 10.2196/59013.
3
FDA launches health care at home initiative to drive equity in digital medical care.
美国食品药品监督管理局发起居家医疗保健倡议,以推动数字医疗的公平性。
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Aug 21;7(1):204. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01198-2.
4
Early access programs for medical devices in France: Overview of recent reforms and outcomes (2015-2022).法国医疗器械早期获取计划:近期改革与成果概述(2015-2022 年)。
Health Policy. 2024 Oct;148:105146. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105146. Epub 2024 Aug 11.
5
Core elements of national policy for digital health technology evidence and access.数字健康技术证据与获取的国家政策核心要素。
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Aug 13;7(1):212. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01209-2.
6
The three-year evolution of Germany's Digital Therapeutics reimbursement program and its path forward.德国数字疗法报销计划的三年演变及其未来发展道路。
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 May 24;7(1):139. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01137-1.
7
Critical success factors for creating sustainable digital health applications: A systematic review of the German case.创建可持续数字健康应用程序的关键成功因素:对德国案例的系统评价
Digit Health. 2024 Apr 24;10:20552076241249604. doi: 10.1177/20552076241249604. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
8
Understanding inherent influencing factors to digital health adoption in general practices through a mixed-methods analysis.通过混合方法分析了解影响全科医疗中数字健康采用的内在因素。
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Feb 27;7(1):47. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01049-0.
9
Mapping Theories, Models, and Frameworks to Evaluate Digital Health Interventions: Scoping Review.用于评估数字健康干预措施的理论、模型和框架映射:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Feb 5;26:e51098. doi: 10.2196/51098.
10
[Digital health applications (DiGA) in the area of tension between progress and criticism : Discussion paper from the "Digital health" specialist group of the German Informatics Society].[进展与批评之间张力领域的数字健康应用(DiGA):德国信息学协会“数字健康”专家组的讨论文件]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2024 Jan;67(1):107-114. doi: 10.1007/s00103-023-03804-2. Epub 2023 Dec 12.