Suppr超能文献

德国数字健康应用的市场准入与基于价值的定价

Market access and value-based pricing of digital health applications in Germany.

作者信息

Gensorowsky Daniel, Witte Julian, Batram Manuel, Greiner Wolfgang

机构信息

School of Public Health, Department of Health Economics and Health Care Management, Bielefeld University, P.O. Box 10 01 31, D-33501, Bielefeld, Germany.

Vandage GmbH, Detmolder Straße 30, D-33604, Bielefeld, Germany.

出版信息

Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2022 Jun 13;20(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12962-022-00359-y.

Abstract

In December 2019, the Digital Health Care Act ("Digitale-Versorgung-Gesetz") introduced a general entitlement to the provision and reimbursement of digital health applications (DiGA) for insured persons in the German statutory health insurance. As establishing a new digital service area within the solidarity-based insurance system implies several administrative and regulatory challenges, this paper aims to describe the legal framework for DiGA market access and pricing as well as the status quo of the DiGA market. Furthermore, we provide a basic approach to deriving value-based DiGA prices.To become eligible for reimbursement, the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices evaluates the compliance of a DiGA with general requirements (e.g., safety and data protection) and its positive healthcare effects (i.e., medical benefit or improvements of care structure and processes) in a fast-track process. Manufacturers may provide evidence for the benefits of their DiGA either directly with the application for the fast-track process or generate it during a trial phase that includes temporary reimbursement. After one year of ]reimbursement, the freely-set manufacturer price is replaced by a price negotiated between the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Funds and the manufacturer. By February 2022, 30 DiGA had successfully completed the fast-track process. 73% make use of the trial phase and have not yet proven their benefit. Given this dynamic growth of the DiGA market and the low minimum evidence standards, fair pricing remains the central point of contention. The regulatory framework makes the patient-relevant benefits of a DiGA a pricing criterion to be considered in particular. Yet, it does not indicate how the benefits of a DiGA should be translated into a reasonable price. Our evidence-based approach to value-based DiGA pricing approximates the SHI's willingness to pay by the average cost-effectiveness of one or more established therapy in a field of indication and furthermore considers the positive healthcare effects of a DiGA.The proposed approach can be fitted into DiGA pricing processes under the given regulatory framework and can provide objective guidance for price negotiations. However, it is only one piece of the pricing puzzle, and numerous methodological and procedural issues related to DiGA pricing are still open. Thus, it remains to be seen to what extent DiGA prices will follow the premise of value-based pricing.

摘要

2019年12月,《数字医疗保健法》(“Digitale-Versorgung-Gesetz”)规定了德国法定医疗保险参保人有权获得数字健康应用程序(DiGA)的提供和报销。由于在基于团结的保险体系内建立一个新的数字服务领域意味着若干行政和监管挑战,本文旨在描述DiGA市场准入和定价的法律框架以及DiGA市场的现状。此外,我们提供了一种基于价值的DiGA价格推导的基本方法。为了符合报销条件,联邦药品和医疗器械研究所会在一个快速流程中评估DiGA是否符合一般要求(如安全性和数据保护)及其积极的医疗保健效果(即医疗益处或护理结构和流程的改善)。制造商可以在申请快速流程时直接提供其DiGA益处的证据,也可以在包括临时报销的试验阶段生成该证据。报销一年后,制造商自主设定的价格将被法定医疗保险基金全国协会与制造商协商的价格所取代。到2022年2月,已有30种DiGA成功完成快速流程。73%的DiGA利用了试验阶段且尚未证明其益处。鉴于DiGA市场的这种动态增长以及较低的最低证据标准,公平定价仍然是争论的焦点。监管框架将DiGA与患者相关的益处作为一个特别要考虑的定价标准。然而,它并未说明DiGA的益处应如何转化为合理的价格。我们基于证据的基于价值的DiGA定价方法通过某一适应症领域一种或多种既定疗法的平均成本效益来近似法定医疗保险的支付意愿,并且还考虑了DiGA的积极医疗保健效果。所提出的方法可以适用于给定监管框架下的DiGA定价流程,并可为价格谈判提供客观指导。然而,它只是定价难题的一部分,与DiGA定价相关的众多方法和程序问题仍然悬而未决。因此,DiGA价格在多大程度上会遵循基于价值定价的前提仍有待观察。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e91b/9195309/33617ab6ae85/12962_2022_359_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验