• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动态卫生技术评估在数字健康解决方案中的应用:以患者为中心的评估的机遇与挑战。

Dynamic HTA for digital health solutions: opportunities and challenges for patient-centered evaluation.

机构信息

Health Innovation Hub of the German Federal Ministry of Health, Berlin, Germany.

Leibniz University Hannover, Hannover, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2023 Nov 17;39(1):e72. doi: 10.1017/S0266462323002726.

DOI:10.1017/S0266462323002726
PMID:37973549
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11579678/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Germany's 2019 Digital Healthcare Act (Digitale-Versorgung-Gesetz, or DVG) created a number of opportunities for the digital transformation of the healthcare delivery system. Key among these was the creation of a reimbursement pathway for patient-centered digital health applications (digitale Gesundheitsanwendungen, or DiGA). Worldwide, this is the first structured pathway for "prescribable" health applications at scale. As of October 10, 2023, 49 DiGA were listed in the official directory maintained by Germany's Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM); these are prescribable by physicians and psychotherapists and reimbursed by the German statutory health insurance system for all its 73 million beneficiaries. Looking ahead, a major challenge facing DiGA manufacturers will be the generation of the evidence required for ongoing price negotiations and reimbursement. Current health technology assessment (HTA) methods will need to be adapted for DiGA.

METHODS

We describe the core issues that distinguish HTA in this setting: (i) explicit allowance for more flexible research designs, (ii) the nature of initial evidence generation, which can be delivered (in its final form) up to one year after becoming reimbursable, and (iii) the dynamic nature of both product development and product evaluation. We present the digital health applications in the German DiGA scheme as a case study and highlight the role of RWE in the successful evaluation of DiGA on an ongoing basis.

RESULTS

When a DiGA is likely to be updated and assessed regularly, full-scale RCTs are infeasible; we therefore make the case for using real-world data and real-world evidence (RWE) for HTAs.

CONCLUSIONS

Continous evaluation using RWD is a regulatory innovation that can help improve the quality of DiGAs on the market.

摘要

目的

德国 2019 年《数字医疗法案》(Digitale-Versorgung-Gesetz,简称 DVG)为医疗保健系统的数字化转型创造了诸多机会。其中的关键举措是为以患者为中心的数字健康应用(digitale Gesundheitsanwendungen,简称 DiGA)创建报销途径。在全球范围内,这是首个针对大规模“可处方”健康应用的结构化途径。截至 2023 年 10 月 10 日,德国联邦药品和医疗器械研究所(Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte,简称 BfArM)维护的官方目录中列出了 49 种 DiGA;这些应用可由医生和心理治疗师开具处方,并由德国法定健康保险系统为其 7300 万受益人报销。展望未来,DiGA 制造商面临的主要挑战将是生成持续价格谈判和报销所需的证据。当前的卫生技术评估(Health Technology Assessment,简称 HTA)方法将需要适应 DiGA。

方法

我们描述了在这种情况下区分 HTA 的核心问题:(i)明确允许更灵活的研究设计,(ii)初始证据生成的性质,其可以在成为可报销的一年后(以最终形式)交付,以及(iii)产品开发和产品评估的动态性质。我们将德国 DiGA 计划中的数字健康应用作为案例研究,并强调 RWE 在持续评估 DiGA 方面的作用。

结果

当 DiGA 可能会定期更新和评估时,全面的 RCT 是不可行的;因此,我们提出了使用真实世界数据和真实世界证据(Real-World Data and Evidence,简称 RWD 和 RWE)进行 HTA 的观点。

结论

使用 RWD 进行持续评估是一种监管创新,可以帮助提高市场上 DiGA 的质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e241/11579678/61afd2972393/S0266462323002726_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e241/11579678/61afd2972393/S0266462323002726_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e241/11579678/61afd2972393/S0266462323002726_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Dynamic HTA for digital health solutions: opportunities and challenges for patient-centered evaluation.动态卫生技术评估在数字健康解决方案中的应用:以患者为中心的评估的机遇与挑战。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2023 Nov 17;39(1):e72. doi: 10.1017/S0266462323002726.
2
Digital Health Applications (DiGAs) on a Fast Track: Insights From a Data-Driven Analysis of Prescribable Digital Therapeutics in Germany From 2020 to Mid-2024.数字健康应用(DiGAs)快速发展:2020 年至 2024 年年中德国可处方数字治疗药物的数据分析洞察。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 29;26:e59013. doi: 10.2196/59013.
3
Market access and value-based pricing of digital health applications in Germany.德国数字健康应用的市场准入与基于价值的定价
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2022 Jun 13;20(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12962-022-00359-y.
4
[The new approval process for the reimbursement of digital health applications (DiGA) from the perspective of the German statutory health insurance].[从德国法定医疗保险角度看数字健康应用程序(DiGA)报销的新审批流程]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2021 Oct;64(10):1220-1227. doi: 10.1007/s00103-021-03401-1. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
5
["Alternative study designs" for the evaluation of digital health applications - a real alternative?].用于评估数字健康应用程序的“替代研究设计”——真的是一种替代方案吗?
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2021 Apr;161:33-41. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2021.01.006. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
6
Performance-based reimbursement for digital therapeutics in Germany: A misconceptualized opportunity.德国数字疗法基于绩效的报销:一个被误解的机遇。
Digit Health. 2024 Sep 23;10:20552076241281199. doi: 10.1177/20552076241281199. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
7
[Experiences of digital health care applications (DIGA) manufacturers with the BfArM Fast-Track procedure].[数字医疗保健应用程序(DIGA)制造商在联邦药品和医疗器械研究所快速通道程序方面的经验]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2021 Oct;64(10):1249-1253. doi: 10.1007/s00103-021-03422-w. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
8
[Digital health applications (DiGA): assessment of reimbursability by means of the "DiGA Fast Track" procedure at the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM)].[数字健康应用程序(DiGA):通过联邦药品和医疗器械研究所(BfArM)的“DiGA快速通道”程序评估可报销性]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2021 Oct;64(10):1232-1240. doi: 10.1007/s00103-021-03409-7. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
9
Integration of digital health applications into the German healthcare system: development of "The DiGA-Care Path".将数字健康应用整合到德国医疗体系:“数字健康应用护理路径”的开发
Front Health Serv. 2024 Mar 13;4:1372522. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1372522. eCollection 2024.
10
[Digital health applications: statutory introduction of patient-centred digital innovations into healthcare].[数字健康应用:以患者为中心的数字创新在医疗保健领域的法定引入]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2021 Oct;64(10):1198-1206. doi: 10.1007/s00103-021-03407-9. Epub 2021 Sep 16.

引用本文的文献

1
A scoping review of frameworks evaluating digital health applications.一项关于评估数字健康应用程序的框架的范围综述。
Digit Health. 2025 Aug 18;11:20552076251315297. doi: 10.1177/20552076251315297. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Comprehensive policies for scaling systemic and equitable integration of digital health technologies.扩大数字健康技术系统性和公平整合的综合政策。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Jul 4;8(1):404. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01820-x.
3
Co-Creation in the Development of Digital Therapeutics: A Narrative Review.数字疗法开发中的共同创造:一项叙述性综述

本文引用的文献

1
Digital health applications and the fast-track pathway to public health coverage in Germany: challenges and opportunities based on first results.数字健康应用程序和德国公共卫生覆盖的快速通道:基于初步结果的挑战和机遇。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Sep 21;22(1):1182. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08500-6.
2
The diagonal approach: A theoretic framework for the economic evaluation of vertical and horizontal interventions in healthcare.对角线方法:医疗保健中垂直和水平干预的经济评估理论框架。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 May;301:114900. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114900. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
3
Health app policy: international comparison of nine countries' approaches.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Nov 28;21(12):1589. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21121589.
4
Unpacking Performance Factors of Innovation Systems and Studying Germany's Attempt to Foster the Role of the Patient Through a Market Access Pathway for Digital Health Applications (DiGAs): Exploratory Mixed Methods Study.剖析创新系统的绩效因素并研究德国通过数字健康应用(DiGAs)的市场准入途径促进患者作用的尝试:探索性混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 6;27:e66356. doi: 10.2196/66356.
5
"Towards harmonizing assessment and reimbursement of digital medical devices in the EU through mutual learning".通过相互学习促进欧盟数字医疗设备评估与报销的协调统一
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Oct 1;7(1):268. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01263-w.
6
Digital Health Applications (DiGAs) on a Fast Track: Insights From a Data-Driven Analysis of Prescribable Digital Therapeutics in Germany From 2020 to Mid-2024.数字健康应用(DiGAs)快速发展:2020 年至 2024 年年中德国可处方数字治疗药物的数据分析洞察。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 29;26:e59013. doi: 10.2196/59013.
7
How can regulation and reimbursement better accommodate flexible suites of digital health technologies?监管和报销如何能更好地适应灵活多样的数字健康技术套件?
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Jul 2;7(1):170. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01156-y.
8
Digital health technologies need regulation and reimbursement that enable flexible interactions and groupings.数字健康技术需要能够实现灵活互动和分组的监管与报销机制。
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Jun 18;7(1):148. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01147-z.
9
The three-year evolution of Germany's Digital Therapeutics reimbursement program and its path forward.德国数字疗法报销计划的三年演变及其未来发展道路。
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 May 24;7(1):139. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01137-1.
10
Lifecycle HTA: promising applications and a framework for implementation. An HTAi Global Policy Forum Task Force report.生命周期健康技术评估:有前景的应用和实施框架。HTAi 全球政策论坛工作组报告。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2024 May 10;40(1):e50. doi: 10.1017/S0266462324000187.
健康应用政策:九个国家方法的国际比较
NPJ Digit Med. 2022 Mar 18;5(1):31. doi: 10.1038/s41746-022-00573-1.
4
Advancing digital health applications: priorities for innovation in real-world evidence generation.推进数字健康应用:真实世界证据生成创新的优先事项。
Lancet Digit Health. 2022 Mar;4(3):e200-e206. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00292-2.
5
The NICE Evidence Standards Framework for digital health and care technologies - Developing and maintaining an innovative evidence framework with global impact.数字健康与护理技术的英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)证据标准框架——开发并维护具有全球影响力的创新证据框架。
Digit Health. 2021 Jun 24;7:20552076211018617. doi: 10.1177/20552076211018617. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
6
Distinguishing features in the assessment of mHealth apps.移动医疗应用程序评估的特点。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2021 Aug;21(4):521-526. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2021.1891883. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
7
Real-world evidence: perspectives on challenges, value, and alignment of regulatory and national health technology assessment data collection requirements.真实世界证据:对监管和国家卫生技术评估数据收集要求的挑战、价值和一致性的观点。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2021 Feb 24;37:e40. doi: 10.1017/S0266462321000131.
8
Real-world evidence use in assessments of cancer drugs by NICE.英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)在癌症药物评估中使用真实世界证据。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020 Jul 10:1-7. doi: 10.1017/S0266462320000434.
9
Lessons From The Impact Of Price Regulation On The Pricing Of Anticancer Drugs In Germany.德国药品价格监管对抗癌药物定价影响的经验教训
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Jul;39(7):1185-1193. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01122.
10
Challenges and opportunities in software-driven medical devices.软件驱动型医疗设备中的挑战与机遇。
Nat Biomed Eng. 2019 Jul;3(7):493-497. doi: 10.1038/s41551-019-0426-z.