Suppr超能文献

经阴道超声检查与磁共振成像在剖宫产瘢痕妊娠诊断中的价值比较:一项Meta分析

Comparison of the value of transvaginal ultrasonography and MRI in the diagnosis of cesarean scar pregnancy: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Han Xiao, Zhang Boyang

机构信息

Department of Ultrasound, the First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical College, Haikou, Hainan, China.

出版信息

J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2025 Dec;38(1):2445661. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2024.2445661. Epub 2025 Jan 6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the diagnostic value of transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) by a method of meta-analysis.

METHODS

Studies on TVS and MRI for CSP were collected from PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang data, and Chinese Scientific Journal Database (VIP database) until April 1, 2024. Stata 15.0 software was used for data analysis. Mann-Whitney U-test was applied to compare the diagnostic efficiency of the TVS and MRI groups.

RESULTS

Nine articles with 713 subjects were involved in this review. The pooled sensitivity (0.96, 95%CI: 0.94-0.97), specificity (0.90, 95%CI: 0.84-0.94), and DOR (197.28, 95%CI: 99.71-390.31) in the MRI group were higher than those (Sensitivity = 0.83, 95%CI: 0.77-0.87; Specificity= 0.74, 95%CI: 0.63-0.83; DOR = 13.66, 95%CI: 7.84-23.79) in the TVS group. The positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio of the MRI group were 9.56 (95%CI: 8.82-15.72) and 0.05 (95%CI: 0.03-0.07), while those of the TVS group were 3.21 (95%CI:2.18-4.74) and 0.24 (95%CI: 0.18-0.31), respectively. In the MRI and TVS groups, the area under the curve (AUC) of the summary receiver operating characteristic was 0.9497 and 0.86, respectively. The results of Mann-Whitney U-tests of the two groups showed significant differences in the pooled sensitivity (Z= -3.311,  < 0.001), specificity (Z= -2.123,  = 0.034), and DOR (Z= -3.272,  = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Both MRI and TVS can effectively diagnose CSP. However, compared with TVS, MRI has better diagnostic accuracy for CSP, with higher sensitivity and specificity. Considering the good diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound, patients with ultrasound suspicion of CSP should be sent to a reference center where MRI can express its full diagnostic potential regarding depth, topography of invasion and myometral residue, which is useful for subsequent management.

摘要

目的

采用Meta分析方法比较经阴道超声(TVS)与磁共振成像(MRI)在剖宫产瘢痕妊娠(CSP)中的诊断价值。

方法

从PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、Embase、Web of Science、中国知网(CNKI)、万方数据和维普数据库(VIP数据库)中收集截至2024年4月1日关于TVS和MRI诊断CSP的研究。使用Stata 15.0软件进行数据分析。采用Mann-Whitney U检验比较TVS组和MRI组的诊断效率。

结果

本综述纳入9篇文章,共713例受试者。MRI组的合并敏感度(0.96,95%CI:0.94-0.97)、特异度(0.90,95%CI:0.84-0.94)和诊断比值比(DOR,197.28,95%CI:99.71-390.31)高于TVS组(敏感度=0.83,95%CI:0.77-0.87;特异度=0.74,95%CI:0.63-0.83;DOR=13.66,95%CI:7.84-23.79)。MRI组的阳性似然比和阴性似然比分别为9.56(95%CI:8.82-15.72)和0.05(95%CI:0.03-0.07),而TVS组分别为3.21(95%CI:2.18-4.74)和0.24(95%CI:0.18-0.31)。在MRI组和TVS组中,汇总受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.9497和0.86。两组的Mann-Whitney U检验结果显示,在合并敏感度(Z=-3.311,P<0.001)、特异度(Z=-2.123,P=0.034)和DOR(Z=-3.272,P=0.001)方面存在显著差异。

结论

MRI和TVS均能有效诊断CSP。然而,与TVS相比,MRI对CSP具有更好的诊断准确性,敏感度和特异度更高。考虑到超声具有良好的诊断准确性,对于超声怀疑为CSP的患者,应将其转诊至能充分发挥MRI在深度、浸润部位及肌层残留方面诊断潜力的参考中心,这对后续治疗有帮助。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验