• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

剖宫产瘢痕妊娠中超声造影的诊断准确性及临界值

Diagnostic accuracy and cut-off of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in caesarean scar pregnancy.

作者信息

Li Haiying, Liu Xinxiu, Xie Lijun, Ye Zhen, Gan Ling

机构信息

Department of Medical Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350005, China.

Department of Medical Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350005, China.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Mar;246:117-122. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.01.036. Epub 2020 Jan 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.01.036
PMID:32007793
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and to search for cut-offs in caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) patients for making quantitative diagnoses.

STUDY DESIGN

Thirty patients in the first trimester of pregnancy were enrolled in our study. They were suspected as being at risk of caesarean scar pregnancy by conventional ultrasound and insisted on abortions. Transvaginal ultrasonography (TVU) and CEUS were performed, and parameters were analysed on the time-intensity curve (TIC). Laparotomy, laparoscopy, hysteroscopy or curettage under the guidance of ultrasound were performed, and pathological finding of villi in the uterine scar is the gold standard for a diagnosis of CSP. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was used to estimate the probability of the correct prediction of CSP.

RESULTS

CSP was diagnosed in 27 patients: pathological diagnosis revealed villus tissue in the scar. The peak intensity ratios of caesarean scar to myometrium have the overall best diagnostic performances (AUC: 0.877, 95 % CI: 0.74-1.00). Using a cut-off value of 1.08 for the peak intensity ratio of caesarean scar to myometrium, the diagnosis sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for CSP were 77.8, 100, 100, and 81.8 %, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

CEUS offers good diagnostic performance, and the peak intensity ratio of caesarean scar to myometrium can be used as a quantitative index to diagnose CSP accurately.

摘要

目的

探讨超声造影(CEUS)的诊断准确性,并寻找剖宫产瘢痕妊娠(CSP)患者进行定量诊断的临界值。

研究设计

本研究纳入了30例妊娠早期患者。她们经传统超声检查怀疑有剖宫产瘢痕妊娠风险,并坚持要求终止妊娠。进行了经阴道超声检查(TVU)和CEUS,并在时间-强度曲线(TIC)上分析参数。在超声引导下进行剖腹手术、腹腔镜检查、宫腔镜检查或刮宫术,子宫瘢痕处绒毛的病理发现是诊断CSP的金标准。采用受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)来估计正确预测CSP的概率。

结果

27例患者被诊断为CSP:病理诊断显示瘢痕处有绒毛组织。剖宫产瘢痕与子宫肌层的峰值强度比具有总体最佳的诊断性能(AUC:0.877,95%CI:0.74 - 1.00)。以剖宫产瘢痕与子宫肌层的峰值强度比为1.08作为临界值,CSP的诊断敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为77.8%、100%、100%和81.8%。

结论

CEUS具有良好的诊断性能,剖宫产瘢痕与子宫肌层的峰值强度比可作为准确诊断CSP的定量指标。

相似文献

1
Diagnostic accuracy and cut-off of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in caesarean scar pregnancy.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠中超声造影的诊断准确性及临界值
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Mar;246:117-122. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.01.036. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
2
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in uterine artery embolization treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy.超声造影在剖宫产瘢痕妊娠子宫动脉栓塞治疗中的应用
J Int Med Res. 2020 Dec;48(12):300060520980217. doi: 10.1177/0300060520980217.
3
Ectopic pregnancies in caesarean section scars: 5 years experience.剖宫产瘢痕部位异位妊娠:5年经验
Clin Imaging. 2020 Oct;66:26-34. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.04.037. Epub 2020 May 3.
4
[Clinical study on 39 cases with caesarean scar pregnancy with sonographic mass].[39例剖宫产瘢痕妊娠伴超声肿块的临床研究]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Jan;49(1):10-3.
5
Clinical value of ultrasonic indicators in predicting the outcome of caesarean scar pregnancy after pregnancy termination.超声指标在预测终止妊娠后剖宫产瘢痕妊娠结局中的临床价值。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Dec 15;23(1):863. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-06197-x.
6
The value of ultrasound parameters in predicting the efficacy of transabdominal ultrasound-guided suction curettage alone in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy.经腹超声引导下单纯抽吸刮宫术治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠疗效的超声参数价值。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2024 Jun;50(6):948-954. doi: 10.1111/jog.15927. Epub 2024 Mar 23.
7
Easy sonographic differential diagnosis between intrauterine pregnancy and cesarean delivery scar pregnancy in the early first trimester.孕早期子宫内妊娠与剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的超声鉴别诊断容易。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Aug;215(2):225.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.02.028. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
8
Application of ultrasonography in the diagnosis and treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy.超声在剖宫产瘢痕妊娠诊治中的应用。
Clin Chim Acta. 2018 Nov;486:291-297. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2018.08.012. Epub 2018 Aug 11.
9
The Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy.超声造影在剖宫产瘢痕妊娠诊断中的价值
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:4762785. doi: 10.1155/2016/4762785. Epub 2016 May 31.
10
Catching an ectopic caesarean scar pregnancy - Radiological perspective.剖宫产瘢痕部位异位妊娠的影像学诊断
Med J Malaysia. 2018 Feb;73(1):51-53.

引用本文的文献

1
Contrast enhanced ultrasound - a useful method for diagnosing tubal ectopic pregnancy with low level β-HCG.超声造影——一种诊断低水平β-HCG输卵管异位妊娠的有用方法。
Ultrasound J. 2025 Jul 23;17(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13089-025-00438-0.
2
Safety of contrast-enhanced ultrasound using microbubbles in human pregnancy: A scoping review.使用微泡的超声造影剂在人类妊娠中的安全性:一项范围综述。
Ultraschall Med. 2025 Jun;46(3):259-269. doi: 10.1055/a-2351-0747. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
3
Clinical Application of a New Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Classification and Evaluation System and a Risk Scoring System.
一种新型剖宫产瘢痕妊娠分类评估系统及风险评分系统的临床应用
Int J Gen Med. 2024 Jan 16;17:115-126. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S445327. eCollection 2024.
4
MRI Assessment of Cesarean Scar Pregnancies: A Case Series.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的MRI评估:病例系列
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 22;12(23):7241. doi: 10.3390/jcm12237241.
5
Comparison of clinical safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided local lauromacrogol injection versus uterine artery embolization in the treatment of caesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.超声引导下局部注射聚桂醇与子宫动脉栓塞治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的临床安全性和疗效比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Mar 7;23(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05455-2.
6
Contrast Agents during Pregnancy: Pros and Cons When Really Needed.妊娠期对比剂的应用:真正需要时的利弊权衡。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 12;19(24):16699. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416699.
7
Unruptured ovarian ectopic pregnancy: Two case reports and literature review.未破裂型卵巢异位妊娠:两例病例报告及文献综述
Front Physiol. 2022 Oct 25;13:1036365. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.1036365. eCollection 2022.
8
Application of laparoscopic internal iliac artery temporary occlusion and uterine repair combined with hysteroscopic aspiration in type III cesarean scar pregnancy.腹腔镜髂内动脉临时阻断联合子宫修复术并宫腔镜吸宫术在Ⅲ型剖宫产瘢痕妊娠中的应用
Am J Transl Res. 2022 Mar 15;14(3):1737-1741. eCollection 2022.
9
Uterine Artery Embolization Combined with Subsequent Suction Evacuation as Low-Risk Treatment for Cesarean Scar Pregnancy.子宫动脉栓塞联合后续清宫术作为剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的低风险治疗方法
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Dec 14;11(12):2350. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11122350.
10
The diagnostic value of 3.0T MRI in cesarean scar pregnancy.3.0T磁共振成像在剖宫产瘢痕妊娠中的诊断价值
Am J Transl Res. 2021 Jun 15;13(6):6229-6235. eCollection 2021.