Gruber Theresa, Lang Claudia, Fliegerová Katerina, Terler Georg, Zebeli Qendrim, Hartinger Thomas
Centre for Animal Nutrition and Welfare, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria.
Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2025 May;109(3):766-776. doi: 10.1111/jpn.14092. Epub 2025 Jan 6.
Increasing droughts adversely affect grasslands, diminishing the availability and quality of forages for ruminants. We have recently shown that mixed ensiling of drought-impaired grass (DIG) with sugar beet pulp (SBP) improved the conservation and feed value of silage. The application of silage additives may further improve the ruminal degradability, which may thereby shape the fermentation and microbiome in the rumen when those silages are tested as part of dairy diets. Therefore, we performed a long-term in vitro nutritional evaluation of diets containing 50% (DM basis) of mixed silages from DIG and SBP, ensiled either with no additive (T_CON) or with anaerobic fungi culture supernatant (25% in DM; T_AF), mixed ruminal fluid (10% in DM; T_RF) or lactic acid bacteria (1% in FM; T_LAB). The data showed a high degradability of all diets (e.g., > 70% for organic matter), though without differences in nutrient degradabilities among treatments (p > 0.05). Fermentation characteristics, such as ruminal pH, short-chain fatty acid profile, and gas production were only marginally affected by the treatments. Isobutyric acid proportion was higher in T_CON than in T_AF (p = 0.01), whereas isovaleric acid proportion was lower in T_LAB than in T_RF (p = 0.01). The analysis of the bacterial community revealed similar diversity and structure across all treatments in both the liquid and solid fraction. Noteworthy, Lactobacillus was among the predominant genera in the liquid fraction, which may have derived from the mixed silages. In conclusion, mixed silages from DIG and SBP as part of a 50% concentrate diet showed high ruminal degradability, but no beneficial impact by the tested silage additives was observed. Hence, under these conditions, their application appears not justified. Our results warrant further in vivo verification, whereby it would be of interest to determine the impact of the applied silage additives in forage-based diets (e.g., > 50% silage in diet DM) in future research.
干旱加剧对草原产生不利影响,降低了反刍动物可用饲料的数量和质量。我们最近的研究表明,将受干旱影响的草(DIG)与甜菜粕(SBP)混合青贮可提高青贮饲料的保存质量和饲用价值。青贮添加剂的应用可能会进一步提高瘤胃降解率,当这些青贮饲料作为奶牛日粮的一部分进行测试时,可能会影响瘤胃中的发酵过程和微生物群落。因此,我们对含有50%(干物质基础)DIG和SBP混合青贮饲料的日粮进行了长期体外营养评估,这些青贮饲料分别不添加任何添加剂(T_CON)或添加厌氧真菌培养上清液(干物质中占25%;T_AF)、混合瘤胃液(干物质中占10%;T_RF)或乳酸菌(鲜物质中占1%;T_LAB)。数据显示所有日粮的降解率都很高(例如,有机物降解率>70%),但各处理之间的养分降解率没有差异(p>0.05)。瘤胃pH值、短链脂肪酸谱和产气量等发酵特性仅受到各处理的轻微影响。T_CON组的异丁酸比例高于T_AF组(p=0.01),而T_LAB组的异戊酸比例低于T_RF组(p=0.01)。细菌群落分析显示,所有处理的液体和固体部分的多样性和结构相似。值得注意的是,乳酸菌是液体部分的主要属之一,这可能源自混合青贮饲料。总之,DIG和SBP的混合青贮饲料作为50%精料日粮的一部分,瘤胃降解率很高,但未观察到所测试的青贮添加剂有有益影响。因此,在这些条件下,它们的应用似乎不合理。我们的结果有待进一步的体内验证,在未来的研究中,确定所应用的青贮添加剂在以草料为主的日粮(例如,日粮干物质中青贮饲料>50%)中的影响将是很有意义的。