Suppr超能文献

儿童结核病Xpert Ultra检测的粪便处理方法:一项前瞻性、多国准确性研究。

Stool processing methods for Xpert Ultra testing in childhood tuberculosis: A prospective, multi-country accuracy study.

作者信息

Jaganath Devan, Nabeta Pamela, Nicol Mark P, Castro Robert, Wambi Peter, Zar Heather J, Workman Lesley, Lodha Rakesh, Singh Urvashi B, Bavdekar Ashish, Sanghavi Sonali, Trollip André, Mace Aurélien, Bonnet Maryline, Lounnas Manon, de Haas Petra, Tiemersma Edine, Alland David, Banada Padmapriya, Cattamanchi Adithya, Ruhwald Morten, Wobudeya Eric, Denkinger Claudia M

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.

Center for Tuberculosis, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.

出版信息

medRxiv. 2024 Dec 18:2024.12.17.24317956. doi: 10.1101/2024.12.17.24317956.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Centrifuge-free processing methods support stool Xpert Ultra testing for childhood tuberculosis (TB), but there are limited data on their accuracy, acceptability and usability.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective evaluation of stool Xpert Ultra in India, South Africa, and Uganda with three methods: Stool Processing Kit (SPK), Simple One-Step (SOS), and Optimized Sucrose Flotation (OSF). Children <15 years old with presumptive TB had respiratory specimen testing with Xpert Ultra and culture. Stool was tested using Xpert Ultra after processing with each method. We compared the accuracy of each method to a microbiological reference standard (MRS) and a composite reference standard (CRS). We surveyed the laboratory staff to assess acceptability and usability of the methods.

RESULTS

We included 607 children, of whom the median age was 3.5 years (IQR 1.3-7), 48% were female, and 15.5% were HIV positive. Against the MRS, the sensitivities of SPK, SOS and OSF were 36.9% (95% CI 28.6-45.8), 38.6% (95% CI 17.2-51), and 31.3% (95% CI 20.2-44.1), respectively. The specificities of SPK, SOS and OSF were 98.2% (95% CI 96.4-99.3), 97.3% (95% CI 93.7-99.1) and 97.1% (95% CI 93.3-99), respectively. Laboratory staff reported that the methods were acceptable and usable, but SOS was most feasible to implement in a peripheral facility. Sensitivity increased among children who were culture-positive (55-77.3%) and was low (13-16.7%) against the CRS.

CONCLUSIONS

Stool processing methods for Xpert Ultra were acceptable, usable, and performed similarly, with highest sensitivity among children with culture-positive TB.

摘要

背景

无离心机处理方法支持用于儿童结核病(TB)的粪便Xpert Ultra检测,但关于其准确性、可接受性和可用性的数据有限。

方法

我们在印度、南非和乌干达采用三种方法对粪便Xpert Ultra进行了前瞻性评估:粪便处理试剂盒(SPK)、简单一步法(SOS)和优化蔗糖浮选法(OSF)。15岁以下疑似结核病儿童的呼吸道标本采用Xpert Ultra检测和培养。粪便经每种方法处理后,再用Xpert Ultra检测。我们将每种方法的准确性与微生物学参考标准(MRS)和综合参考标准(CRS)进行了比较。我们对实验室工作人员进行了调查,以评估这些方法的可接受性和可用性。

结果

我们纳入了607名儿童,其中位年龄为3.5岁(四分位间距1.3 - 7),48%为女性,15.5%为HIV阳性。与MRS相比,SPK、SOS和OSF的敏感性分别为36.9%(95%置信区间28.6 - 45.8)、38.6%(95%置信区间17.2 - 51)和31.3%(95%置信区间20.2 - 44.1)。SPK、SOS和OSF的特异性分别为98.2%(95%置信区间96.4 - 99.3)、97.3%(95%置信区间93.7 - 99.1)和97.1%(95%置信区间93.3 - 99)。实验室工作人员报告称这些方法是可接受和可用的,但SOS在基层医疗机构实施最可行。在培养阳性的儿童中敏感性增加(55 - 77.3%),而与CRS相比敏感性较低(13 - 16.7%)。

结论

用于Xpert Ultra的粪便处理方法是可接受、可用的,且表现相似,在培养阳性的结核病儿童中敏感性最高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91f0/11702738/414014fb4a6d/nihpp-2024.12.17.24317956v1-f0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验