Suppr超能文献

自我反思及治疗结果反馈的附加价值:一项试点研究。

The additional value of self-reflection and feedback on therapy outcome: a pilot study.

作者信息

Kamp David, Blanker Cynthia, Hafkenscheid Anton, van Os Jim

机构信息

UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Psychiatrie Rivierenland Tiel, Tiel, Netherlands.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 23;15:1451251. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1451251. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Over the past few decades, psychotherapy research was dominated by testing the efficacy of "brand name" therapeutic techniques and models. Another line of research however, suggests that common factors, such as the therapeutic alliance and empathy, might play a greater role in effective therapy than specific therapeutic techniques and models. Routine process monitoring (RPM), focusing on common factors, has emerged as a promising approach to enhance therapy outcomes. This ongoing feedback loop aims to improve the therapeutic alliance and to address countertransference issues, potentially leading to better therapy outcomes.

METHODS

A total of 131 patients above the age of 18 were included into the sample. The design of the study consisted of three stages, in which two kinds of instruments to measure the therapeutic alliance and countertransference were administered, namely the Session Rating Scale (SRS) and a brief version of Impact Message Inventory-Circumplex (IMI-CS). The Outcome Rating Scale (ORS) was used as an outcome measure. Depending on the stage of the study, these three instruments were administered every time a patient had a psychotherapy session.

RESULTS

Patients reported improved outcomes on the ORS in T2 compared to T1 ( = 0.011). Furthermore, a significant increase in the strength of the therapeutic relationship, as measured by the SRS, occurred between T2 and T3 ( = 0.031). A positive correlation was found between SRS scores and the "friendly" position on the IMI-CS ( = <0.000), while a negative correlation was found between SRS ratings and the "submissive" position on the IMI-CS ( = 0.019).

DISCUSSION

Patients experienced improvements and might attribute part of their improvement to the relationship with their therapists, evaluating the therapeutic alliance more positively in the later stages of their treatment. Despite methodological challenges, such as varying treatment durations and pre-existing therapist-patient relationships, the findings highlight the value of patient engagement and therapist self-reflection. This study supports the utility of deliberate practice in psychotherapy, suggesting it can enhance therapeutic outcome and laying the groundwork for future research.

摘要

引言

在过去几十年里,心理治疗研究主要集中在测试“知名”治疗技术和模式的疗效。然而,另一系列研究表明,诸如治疗联盟和同理心等共同因素在有效治疗中可能比特定的治疗技术和模式发挥更大的作用。关注共同因素的常规过程监测(RPM)已成为一种有望提高治疗效果的方法。这种持续的反馈循环旨在改善治疗联盟并解决反移情问题,有可能带来更好的治疗效果。

方法

共有131名18岁以上的患者被纳入样本。该研究设计包括三个阶段,在这三个阶段中使用了两种测量治疗联盟和反移情的工具,即会话评定量表(SRS)和简版的影响信息量表-环形模型(IMI-CS)。结果评定量表(ORS)用作结果测量指标。根据研究阶段,每当患者进行一次心理治疗时,就会使用这三种工具。

结果

与T1相比,患者在T2时的ORS结果有所改善(=0.011)。此外,通过SRS测量,T2和T3之间治疗关系的强度显著增加(=0.031)。发现SRS得分与IMI-CS上的“友好”位置呈正相关(=<0.000),而SRS评分与IMI-CS上的“顺从”位置呈负相关(=0.019)。

讨论

患者有改善,并且可能将部分改善归因于与治疗师的关系,在治疗后期对治疗联盟的评价更为积极。尽管存在方法上的挑战,如治疗时长不同和已有的治疗师-患者关系,但研究结果凸显了患者参与和治疗师自我反思的价值。本研究支持在心理治疗中刻意练习的效用,表明它可以提高治疗效果,并为未来研究奠定基础。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85a1/11700981/2f77b6a388ea/fpsyg-15-1451251-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验