Cherny N I, Nortjé N, Kelly R, Zimmermann C, Jordan K, Kreye G, Le N-S, Adelson K B
Departments Medical Oncology and Palliative Care, Helmsley Cancer Center, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Center for Clinical Ethics in Cancer Care and Department of Critical Care Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
ESMO Open. 2025 Jan;10(1):104099. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104099. Epub 2025 Jan 6.
Many patients with cancer approaching the end of life (EOL) continue to receive treatments that are unlikely to provide meaningful clinical benefit, potentially causing more harm than good. This is called overtreatment at the EOL. Overtreatment harms patients by causing side-effects, increasing health care costs, delaying important discussions about and preparation for EOL care, and occasionally accelerating death. Overtreatment can also strain health care resources, reducing those available for palliative care services, and cause moral distress for clinicians and treatment teams. This article reviews the factors contributing to the overtreatment of patients with cancer at the EOL. It addresses the complex range of social, psychological, and cognitive factors affecting oncologists, patients, and patients' family members that contribute to this phenomenon. This intricate and complex dynamic complicates the task of reducing overtreatment. Addressing these driving factors requires a cooperative approach involving oncologists, oncology nurses, professional societies, public policy, and public education. We therefore discuss approaches and strategies to mitigate cultural and professional influences driving overtreatment, reduce the seduction of new technologies, improve clinician-patient communication regarding therapeutic options for patients approaching the EOL, and address cognitive biases that can contribute to overtreatment at the EOL.
许多临终癌症患者仍在接受不太可能带来有意义临床益处的治疗,这可能弊大于利。这被称为临终过度治疗。过度治疗会给患者带来伤害,引发副作用、增加医疗成本、推迟有关临终关怀的重要讨论和准备工作,有时还会加速死亡。过度治疗还会使医疗资源紧张,减少可用于姑息治疗服务的资源,并给临床医生和治疗团队带来道德困扰。本文回顾了导致临终癌症患者过度治疗的因素。它探讨了影响肿瘤学家、患者及其家属的一系列复杂的社会、心理和认知因素,这些因素促成了这一现象。这种错综复杂的动态关系使减少过度治疗的任务变得复杂。解决这些驱动因素需要肿瘤学家、肿瘤护理人员、专业协会、公共政策和公众教育等多方合作。因此,我们讨论了减轻导致过度治疗的文化和专业影响、减少新技术诱惑、改善临床医生与临终患者关于治疗选择的沟通,以及解决可能导致临终过度治疗的认知偏差的方法和策略。