Canavan Maureen E, Wang Xiaoliang, Ascha Mustafa S, Miksad Rebecca A, Showalter Timothy N, Calip Gregory S, Gross Cary P, Adelson Kerin B
Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Flatiron Health, New York, New York.
JAMA Oncol. 2024 Jul 1;10(7):887-895. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.1129.
Two prominent organizations, the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the National Quality Forum (NQF), have developed a cancer quality metric aimed at reducing systemic anticancer therapy administration at the end of life. This metric, NQF 0210 (patients receiving chemotherapy in the last 14 days of life), has been critiqued for focusing only on care for decedents and not including the broader population of patients who may benefit from treatment.
To evaluate whether the overall population of patients with metastatic cancer receiving care at practices with higher rates of oncologic therapy for very advanced disease experience longer survival.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This nationwide population-based cohort study used Flatiron Health, a deidentified electronic health record database of patients diagnosed with metastatic or advanced disease, to identify adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with 1 of 6 common cancers (breast cancer, colorectal cancer, non-small cell lung cancer [NSCLC], pancreatic cancer, renal cell carcinoma, and urothelial cancer) treated at health care practices from 2015 to 2019. Practices were stratified into quintiles based on retrospectively measured rates of NQF 0210, and overall survival was compared by disease type among all patients treated in each practice quintile from time of metastatic diagnosis using multivariable Cox proportional hazard models with a Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Data were analyzed from July 2021 to July 2023.
Practice-level NQF 0210 quintiles.
Overall survival.
Of 78 446 patients (mean [SD] age, 67.3 [11.1] years; 52.2% female) across 144 practices, the most common cancer types were NSCLC (34 201 patients [43.6%]) and colorectal cancer (15 804 patients [20.1%]). Practice-level NQF 0210 rates varied from 10.9% (quintile 1) to 32.3% (quintile 5) for NSCLC and 6.8% (quintile 1) to 28.4% (quintile 5) for colorectal cancer. No statistically significant differences in survival were observed between patients treated at the highest and the lowest NQF 0210 quintiles. Compared with patients seen at practices in the lowest NQF 0210 quintiles, the hazard ratio for death among patients seen at the highest quintiles varied from 0.74 (95% CI, 0.55-0.99) for those with renal cell carcinoma to 1.41 (95% CI, 0.98-2.02) for those with urothelial cancer. These differences were not statistically significant after applying the Bonferroni-adjusted critical P = .008.
In this cohort study, patients with metastatic or advanced cancer treated at practices with higher NQF 0210 rates did not have improved survival. Future efforts should focus on helping oncologists identify when additional therapy is futile, developing goals of care communication skills, and aligning payment incentives with improved end-of-life care.
美国临床肿瘤学会和国家质量论坛(NQF)这两个著名组织制定了一项癌症质量指标,旨在减少临终时全身抗癌治疗的使用。该指标NQF 0210(在生命的最后14天接受化疗的患者)因仅关注死者护理,未涵盖可能从治疗中受益的更广泛患者群体而受到批评。
评估在针对极晚期疾病的肿瘤治疗率较高的医疗机构接受治疗的转移性癌症患者总体是否生存期更长。
设计、设置和参与者:这项基于全国人口的队列研究使用了Flatiron Health,这是一个已去除身份标识的电子健康记录数据库,涵盖被诊断为转移性或晚期疾病的患者,以识别2015年至2019年在医疗机构接受治疗的6种常见癌症(乳腺癌、结直肠癌、非小细胞肺癌[NSCLC]、胰腺癌、肾细胞癌和尿路上皮癌)之一的成年患者(年龄≥18岁)。根据回顾性测量的NQF 0210率将医疗机构分为五等份,并使用多变量Cox比例风险模型,对所有在各医疗机构五等份中接受治疗的患者从转移性诊断时起按疾病类型比较总生存期,并采用Bonferroni校正进行多重比较。数据于2021年7月至2023年7月进行分析。
医疗机构层面的NQF 0210五等份。
总生存期。
在144家医疗机构的78446例患者(平均[标准差]年龄,67.3[11.1]岁;52.2%为女性)中,最常见的癌症类型是NSCLC(34201例患者[43.6%])和结直肠癌(15804例患者[20.1%])。NSCLC的医疗机构层面NQF 0210率从10.9%(第一等份)到32.3%(第五等份)不等,结直肠癌则从6.8%(第一等份)到28.4%(第五等份)不等。在NQF 0210最高和最低五等份接受治疗的患者之间,未观察到生存方面的统计学显著差异。与在NQF 0210最低五等份医疗机构就诊的患者相比,在最高五等份就诊的患者的死亡风险比,肾细胞癌患者为0.74(95%CI,0.55 - 0.99),尿路上皮癌患者为1.41(95%CI,0.98 - 2.02)。在应用Bonferroni调整后的临界P = 0.008后,这些差异无统计学显著性。
在这项队列研究中,在NQF 0210率较高的医疗机构接受治疗的转移性或晚期癌症患者生存期并未改善。未来的努力应集中在帮助肿瘤学家确定何时额外治疗无效、培养护理目标沟通技巧以及使支付激励措施与改善临终护理保持一致。