• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

晚期实体瘤患者的全身抗癌治疗与总生存期

Systemic Anticancer Therapy and Overall Survival in Patients With Very Advanced Solid Tumors.

作者信息

Canavan Maureen E, Wang Xiaoliang, Ascha Mustafa S, Miksad Rebecca A, Showalter Timothy N, Calip Gregory S, Gross Cary P, Adelson Kerin B

机构信息

Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

Flatiron Health, New York, New York.

出版信息

JAMA Oncol. 2024 Jul 1;10(7):887-895. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.1129.

DOI:10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.1129
PMID:38753341
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11099840/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Two prominent organizations, the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the National Quality Forum (NQF), have developed a cancer quality metric aimed at reducing systemic anticancer therapy administration at the end of life. This metric, NQF 0210 (patients receiving chemotherapy in the last 14 days of life), has been critiqued for focusing only on care for decedents and not including the broader population of patients who may benefit from treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether the overall population of patients with metastatic cancer receiving care at practices with higher rates of oncologic therapy for very advanced disease experience longer survival.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This nationwide population-based cohort study used Flatiron Health, a deidentified electronic health record database of patients diagnosed with metastatic or advanced disease, to identify adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with 1 of 6 common cancers (breast cancer, colorectal cancer, non-small cell lung cancer [NSCLC], pancreatic cancer, renal cell carcinoma, and urothelial cancer) treated at health care practices from 2015 to 2019. Practices were stratified into quintiles based on retrospectively measured rates of NQF 0210, and overall survival was compared by disease type among all patients treated in each practice quintile from time of metastatic diagnosis using multivariable Cox proportional hazard models with a Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Data were analyzed from July 2021 to July 2023.

EXPOSURE

Practice-level NQF 0210 quintiles.

MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURE

Overall survival.

RESULTS

Of 78 446 patients (mean [SD] age, 67.3 [11.1] years; 52.2% female) across 144 practices, the most common cancer types were NSCLC (34 201 patients [43.6%]) and colorectal cancer (15 804 patients [20.1%]). Practice-level NQF 0210 rates varied from 10.9% (quintile 1) to 32.3% (quintile 5) for NSCLC and 6.8% (quintile 1) to 28.4% (quintile 5) for colorectal cancer. No statistically significant differences in survival were observed between patients treated at the highest and the lowest NQF 0210 quintiles. Compared with patients seen at practices in the lowest NQF 0210 quintiles, the hazard ratio for death among patients seen at the highest quintiles varied from 0.74 (95% CI, 0.55-0.99) for those with renal cell carcinoma to 1.41 (95% CI, 0.98-2.02) for those with urothelial cancer. These differences were not statistically significant after applying the Bonferroni-adjusted critical P = .008.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort study, patients with metastatic or advanced cancer treated at practices with higher NQF 0210 rates did not have improved survival. Future efforts should focus on helping oncologists identify when additional therapy is futile, developing goals of care communication skills, and aligning payment incentives with improved end-of-life care.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3724/11099840/468922e9f660/jamaoncol-e241129-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3724/11099840/5cc69363bc01/jamaoncol-e241129-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3724/11099840/468922e9f660/jamaoncol-e241129-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3724/11099840/5cc69363bc01/jamaoncol-e241129-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3724/11099840/468922e9f660/jamaoncol-e241129-g002.jpg
摘要

重要性

美国临床肿瘤学会和国家质量论坛(NQF)这两个著名组织制定了一项癌症质量指标,旨在减少临终时全身抗癌治疗的使用。该指标NQF 0210(在生命的最后14天接受化疗的患者)因仅关注死者护理,未涵盖可能从治疗中受益的更广泛患者群体而受到批评。

目的

评估在针对极晚期疾病的肿瘤治疗率较高的医疗机构接受治疗的转移性癌症患者总体是否生存期更长。

设计、设置和参与者:这项基于全国人口的队列研究使用了Flatiron Health,这是一个已去除身份标识的电子健康记录数据库,涵盖被诊断为转移性或晚期疾病的患者,以识别2015年至2019年在医疗机构接受治疗的6种常见癌症(乳腺癌、结直肠癌、非小细胞肺癌[NSCLC]、胰腺癌、肾细胞癌和尿路上皮癌)之一的成年患者(年龄≥18岁)。根据回顾性测量的NQF 0210率将医疗机构分为五等份,并使用多变量Cox比例风险模型,对所有在各医疗机构五等份中接受治疗的患者从转移性诊断时起按疾病类型比较总生存期,并采用Bonferroni校正进行多重比较。数据于2021年7月至2023年7月进行分析。

暴露因素

医疗机构层面的NQF 0210五等份。

主要结局和衡量指标

总生存期。

结果

在144家医疗机构的78446例患者(平均[标准差]年龄,67.3[11.1]岁;52.2%为女性)中,最常见的癌症类型是NSCLC(34201例患者[43.6%])和结直肠癌(15804例患者[20.1%])。NSCLC的医疗机构层面NQF 0210率从10.9%(第一等份)到32.3%(第五等份)不等,结直肠癌则从6.8%(第一等份)到28.4%(第五等份)不等。在NQF 0210最高和最低五等份接受治疗的患者之间,未观察到生存方面的统计学显著差异。与在NQF 0210最低五等份医疗机构就诊的患者相比,在最高五等份就诊的患者的死亡风险比,肾细胞癌患者为0.74(95%CI,0.55 - 0.99),尿路上皮癌患者为1.41(95%CI,0.98 - 2.02)。在应用Bonferroni调整后的临界P = 0.008后,这些差异无统计学显著性。

结论与意义

在这项队列研究中,在NQF 0210率较高的医疗机构接受治疗的转移性或晚期癌症患者生存期并未改善。未来的努力应集中在帮助肿瘤学家确定何时额外治疗无效、培养护理目标沟通技巧以及使支付激励措施与改善临终护理保持一致。

相似文献

1
Systemic Anticancer Therapy and Overall Survival in Patients With Very Advanced Solid Tumors.晚期实体瘤患者的全身抗癌治疗与总生存期
JAMA Oncol. 2024 Jul 1;10(7):887-895. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.1129.
2
Association of Broad-Based Genomic Sequencing With Survival Among Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Community Oncology Setting.社区肿瘤学环境中广泛基于基因组测序与晚期非小细胞肺癌患者生存的关联。
JAMA. 2018 Aug 7;320(5):469-477. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.9824.
3
First-line treatment of advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation positive non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.晚期表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变阳性非鳞状非小细胞肺癌的一线治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 18;3(3):CD010383. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010383.pub3.
4
Regional variation in spending and survival for older adults with advanced cancer.老年晚期癌症患者的支出和生存的地区差异。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 May 1;105(9):634-42. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt025. Epub 2013 Mar 12.
5
Cisplatin versus carboplatin in combination with third-generation drugs for advanced non-small cell lung cancer.顺铂与卡铂联合第三代药物治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 13;1(1):CD009256. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009256.pub3.
6
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation (EGFR) Testing for Prediction of Response to EGFR-Targeting Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI) Drugs in Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: An Evidence-Based Analysis.表皮生长因子受体突变(EGFR)检测对晚期非小细胞肺癌患者使用表皮生长因子受体靶向酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)药物疗效的预测:一项循证分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010;10(24):1-48. Epub 2010 Dec 1.
7
Evaluation of Reliability and Correlations of Quality Measures in Cancer Care.癌症护理质量衡量标准的可靠性评估及其相关性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Mar 1;4(3):e212474. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.2474.
8
Treatment Patterns of Real-World Patients with TRK Fusion Cancer Treated by US Community Oncologists.美国社区肿瘤医师治疗的真实世界 TRK 融合癌患者的治疗模式。
Target Oncol. 2022 Sep;17(5):549-561. doi: 10.1007/s11523-022-00909-7. Epub 2022 Sep 11.
9
Real-World Costs of Adverse Events in First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.真实世界中转移性非小细胞肺癌一线治疗不良事件的成本。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Jun;26(6):729-740. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.6.729.
10
Practice-Level Variation in Molecular Testing and Use of Targeted Therapy for Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Colorectal Cancer.非小细胞肺癌和结直肠癌患者的分子检测和靶向治疗的实践水平变化。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Apr 3;6(4):e2310809. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.10809.

引用本文的文献

1
Palliative care use and end-of-life care quality in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer.激素受体阳性/人表皮生长因子受体2阴性转移性乳腺癌的姑息治疗使用情况及临终关怀质量
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Aug 16. doi: 10.1007/s10549-025-07805-4.
2
Advance care planning for adults with cancer.癌症成年患者的预先护理规划。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jul 30;7(7):CD016227. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD016227.
3
Family satisfaction with the end-of-life discussions and resuscitation orders for patients with severe COVID-19: a multicenter study in Saudi Arabia.

本文引用的文献

1
End-of-Life Systemic Oncologic Treatment in the Immunotherapy Era: The Role of Race, Insurance, and Practice Setting.免疫治疗时代的终末期系统肿瘤治疗:种族、保险和实践环境的作用。
J Clin Oncol. 2023 Oct 20;41(30):4729-4738. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.02180. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
2
You Get (offered) What You (can) Pay for: Explaining Disparities in End-of-Life Cancer Care.一分钱一分货:解释临终癌症护理中的差异。
J Clin Oncol. 2023 Oct 20;41(30):4721-4723. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.00608. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
3
Priority Research Topics and Patient and Family Needs in a National Sample of Hospice Agencies.
沙特阿拉伯一项多中心研究:新冠重症患者家属对临终讨论及复苏医嘱的满意度
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Jul 26;26(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01248-8.
4
Overall Survival and Quality-of-Life Superiority in Modern Phase 3 Oncology Trials: A Meta-Epidemiological Analysis.现代3期肿瘤学试验中的总生存期和生活质量优势:一项Meta流行病学分析
JAMA Oncol. 2025 Jun 1. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2025.1002.
5
We Need to Talk About Quality of Life with Cancer Patients: Primum Non Nocere in Oncology.我们需要与癌症患者谈论生活质量:肿瘤学中的首要原则是不伤害。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 May 19;61(5):918. doi: 10.3390/medicina61050918.
6
The Erosion of Healthcare and Scientific Integrity: A Growing Concern.医疗保健与科学诚信的侵蚀:日益令人担忧的问题。
J Healthc Leadersh. 2025 Feb 21;17:23-43. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S506767. eCollection 2025.
7
A taxonomy of the factors contributing to the overtreatment of cancer patients at the end of life. What is the problem? Why does it happen? How can it be addressed?一份关于导致癌症患者临终过度治疗因素的分类法。问题是什么?为何会发生?如何解决?
ESMO Open. 2025 Jan;10(1):104099. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104099. Epub 2025 Jan 6.
8
Change of Article Status to Open Access.文章状态变更为开放获取。
JAMA Oncol. 2025 Jan 1;11(1):80. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.5689.
9
Prognostic Value of Performance Status, Albumin, and CRP in Last-Line Chemotherapy for Pancreatic vs. Other Gastrointestinal Cancers-Simple Tools Matter.在胰腺癌与其他胃肠道癌的最后一线化疗中,体能状态、白蛋白和 CRP 的预后价值——简单的工具很重要。
Curr Oncol. 2024 Sep 14;31(9):5462-5471. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31090404.
10
Trends in use of intensive care during hospitalizations at the end-of-life among older adults with advanced cancer.晚期癌症老年患者临终住院期间重症监护使用情况的趋势
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Dec;72(12):3840-3848. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19119. Epub 2024 Aug 1.
全国临终关怀机构样本中的优先研究主题以及患者和家庭需求
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Feb;65(2):133-142. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.10.009. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
4
Systemic Anticancer Therapy at the End of Life-Changes in Usage Pattern in the Immunotherapy Era.临终时的全身抗癌治疗——免疫治疗时代的使用模式变化
JAMA Oncol. 2022 Dec 1;8(12):1847-1849. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.4666.
5
Perceptions of Hope Among Bereaved Caregivers of Cancer Patients Who Received Early Palliative Care: A Content and Lexicographic Analysis.癌症患者临终关怀早期接受姑息治疗的丧亲照护者的希望认知:内容和词典分析。
Oncologist. 2022 Mar 4;27(2):e168-e175. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyab027.
6
Racial and ethnic disparities in early treatment with immunotherapy for advanced HCC in the United States.美国晚期 HCC 免疫治疗早期治疗中的种族和民族差异。
Hepatology. 2022 Dec;76(6):1649-1659. doi: 10.1002/hep.32527. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
7
Assessment of Alectinib vs Ceritinib in ALK-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Phase 2 Trials and in Real-world Data.评估阿来替尼与塞瑞替尼用于 2 期临床试验及真实世界数据中的 ALK 阳性非小细胞肺癌。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Oct 1;4(10):e2126306. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.26306.
8
Selpercatinib in RET fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (SIREN): a retrospective analysis of patients treated through an access program.塞尔帕替尼治疗RET融合阳性非小细胞肺癌(SIREN):一项通过准入计划治疗患者的回顾性分析
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2021 Jun 11;13:17588359211019675. doi: 10.1177/17588359211019675. eCollection 2021.
9
Development and evaluation of a proxy for baseline ECOG PS in advanced non-small cell lung cancer, bladder cancer, and melanoma: An electronic health record study.开发和评估晚期非小细胞肺癌、膀胱癌和黑色素瘤中 ECOG PS 基线的替代指标:一项电子健康记录研究。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2021 Sep;30(9):1233-1241. doi: 10.1002/pds.5309. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
10
Validation analysis of a composite real-world mortality endpoint for patients with cancer in the United States.美国癌症患者复合真实世界死亡率终点的验证分析。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Dec;56(6):1281-1287. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13669. Epub 2021 May 17.