Shi Xiaoqing, Zheng Bin, Liu Xiaoli, Li Fangwen, Zhu Zhangshun, Quan Qiumei, Li Yunxiang
Chengdu Botanical Garden (Chengdu Institute of Park City Plant Research), Chengdu 610083, China.
College of Environmental Science and Engineering, China West Normal University, Nanchong 637009, China.
Biology (Basel). 2024 Dec 4;13(12):1009. doi: 10.3390/biology13121009.
To understand the reproductive strategies of the typically introduced plant and to compare the pollination efficiency of its different pollinators, we observed, measured, and recorded the flowering dynamics, floral traits, and visiting insects of . Furthermore, we compared the body size, visitation rate, and pollination efficiency of the pollination insects of . The results indicated that, despite exhibiting specialized moth pollination characteristics based on similarities in flower features to other moth-pollinated species, actually presented a generalized pollination system. The nectar of attracted a variety of insects to provide pollination services, a total of five flower visitors, one moth species (), and four bee species (, , , and ), were found to provide pollination services for . The pollination efficiency of these pollinators was related to the parts of their body in contact with the stamens and stigmas of flowers. Although was larger in size and its visitation frequency in our field observations was higher, its pollination efficiency was lower. This was due to the small part of its body (proboscis) contacting the two sexual organs of while visiting flowers, resulting in a low amount of pollen being transferred and deposited. In contrast, the bee pollinators' proboscis was significantly shorter than that of , and it must enter the flower to suck the nectar that is hidden deeply inside the base of the flower. Therefore, the body parts of bee pollinators in contact with the two sexual organs of were larger than in the process of visiting flowers, and the pollination efficiencies were significantly higher than those of . In addition, larger bee pollinators have higher pollination efficiency. As a result, suffered from pollen limitation due to the pollination efficiencies of the moth pollinators in the introduced habitats, but it compensated by attracting more species of bee pollinators.
为了解该典型外来植物的繁殖策略,并比较其不同传粉者的传粉效率,我们对其开花动态、花部特征和访花昆虫进行了观察、测量和记录。此外,我们还比较了其传粉昆虫的体型、访花率和传粉效率。结果表明,尽管该植物基于花部特征与其他蛾类传粉物种的相似性表现出专门的蛾类传粉特征,但实际上呈现出一种广义传粉系统。该植物的花蜜吸引了多种昆虫提供传粉服务,共发现五种访花者,一种蛾类物种()和四种蜜蜂物种(、、、和)为其提供传粉服务。这些传粉者的传粉效率与其身体与花朵雄蕊和柱头接触的部位有关。虽然在我们的野外观察中体型较大且访花频率较高,但其传粉效率较低。这是因为其身体(喙)在访花时与该植物两性器官接触的部分较小,导致花粉转移和沉积量较低。相比之下,蜜蜂传粉者的喙明显短于,且必须进入花中吸食隐藏在花基部深处的花蜜。因此,蜜蜂传粉者在访花过程中与该植物两性器官接触的身体部位比大,传粉效率显著高于。此外,体型较大的蜜蜂传粉者传粉效率更高。结果,该植物在引入栖息地由于蛾类传粉者的传粉效率而受到花粉限制,但它通过吸引更多种类的蜜蜂传粉者来进行补偿。