Ródenas Quiñonero Isabel, Marco-Ayala Javier, Chen-Liang Tzu-Hua, de la Cruz-Vicente Fátima, Baumann Tycho, Navarro José-Tomás, Martín García-Sancho Alejandro, Martin-Santos Taida, López-Jiménez Javier, Andreu Rafael, Parra Ester, Usas Andrea, Alonso David, Fernández-González Marta, Palomo Rumschisky Pablo, Frutos Laura, Navarro José Luis, Alvarez-Perez Rosa María, Sarandeses Pilar, Cortes Montserrat, Tamayo Pilar, Uña Jon, Martínez-Lorca Alberto, Ruiz Cristina, Lozano María Luisa, Ortuño Francisco José
Servicio de Hematología, Hospital José María Morales Meseguer, IMIB-Pascual Parrilla, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red. Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), 30008 Murcia, Spain.
Department of Medicine, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain.
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Dec 16;16(24):4189. doi: 10.3390/cancers16244189.
Assessment of bone marrow infiltration (BMI) is part of the initial staging of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), although BMI evaluated by biopsy (BMB) is not considered significant in the MIPI scales, and standardized recommendations remain lacking.
To evaluate the accuracy and prognostic impact of BMI assessed by PET/CT and BMB in a large series of MCL patients.
We deconstructed the IPI-NCCN, MIPI, and MIPI-c indices and considered BMI as positive if indicated by a BMB, PET/CT scan, or a combination of both.
In the total cohort ( = 148), 110 patients had BMI detected by BMB and 33 by PET/CT. The sensitivity of BMB was higher than that of PET/CT (94.8% vs. 28.4%), as were its negative predictive value (84.2% vs. 27.8%) and accuracy (95.9% vs. 43.9%). In the total cohort, BMI detected by PET/CT showed a significant predictive value for PFS ( = 0.027), while BMB demonstrated independent prognostic value only in combination with PET/CT ( = 0.025). Among intensively treated patients ( = 128), PET/CT had significant clinical impact on PFS ( = 0.030), and when combined with BMB, it provided independent prognostic value for both PFS and OS ( = 0.026 and = 0.033, respectively). Based on these findings, we propose a prognostic model (MCL-PET-I) that incorporates BMI by PET/CT, allowing for the identification of three groups with distinct clinical outcomes ( < 0.0001 for PFS and = 0.00025 for OS).
In the upfront work of MCL, PET/CT-based BMI has greater prognostic impact, while BMB remains essential for staging. We propose the MCL-PET-I prognostic index, which effectively differentiates between clinical risk groups.
骨髓浸润(BMI)评估是套细胞淋巴瘤(MCL)初始分期的一部分,尽管通过活检评估的BMI(BMB)在MIPI量表中不被认为具有重要意义,且仍缺乏标准化建议。
评估PET/CT和BMB评估的BMI在大量MCL患者中的准确性和预后影响。
我们解构了IPI-NCCN、MIPI和MIPI-c指数,若BMB、PET/CT扫描或两者结合显示BMI阳性,则认为BMI为阳性。
在整个队列(n = 148)中,110例患者通过BMB检测到BMI,33例通过PET/CT检测到。BMB的敏感性高于PET/CT(94.8%对28.4%),其阴性预测值(84.2%对27.8%)和准确性(95.9%对43.9%)也是如此。在整个队列中,PET/CT检测到的BMI对无进展生存期(PFS)具有显著预测价值(P = 0.027),而BMB仅在与PET/CT结合时显示出独立的预后价值(P = 0.025)。在接受强化治疗的患者(n = 128)中,PET/CT对PFS具有显著临床影响(P = 0.030),当与BMB结合时,它对PFS和总生存期(OS)均提供独立的预后价值(分别为P = 0.026和P = 0.033)。基于这些发现,我们提出了一种预后模型(MCL-PET-I),该模型纳入了PET/CT评估的BMI,能够识别出具有不同临床结局的三组患者(PFS的P < 0.0001,OS的P = 0.00025)。
在MCL的前期工作中,基于PET/CT的BMI具有更大的预后影响,而BMB对于分期仍然至关重要。我们提出了MCL-PET-I预后指数,该指数能够有效区分临床风险组。