Suppr超能文献

新辅助短程放化疗对老年局部晚期直肠癌患者的疗效:单中心回顾性分析

Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Hypofractionated Chemoradiotherapy in Elderly Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.

作者信息

Kim Jae Seung, Lee Jaram, Park Hyeung-Min, Lee Soo Young, Kim Chang Hyun, Kim Hyeong Rok

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital and Medical School, Hwasun 58128, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2024 Dec 23;16(24):4280. doi: 10.3390/cancers16244280.

Abstract

: The application of long-course chemoradiotherapy (LCRT) in elderly patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) can be challenging due to increased risks of complications associated with comorbidities and reduced functional status. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of neoadjuvant hypofractionated chemoradiotherapy (HCRT) in elderly patients with mid-to-low LARC. : We performed a retrospective review of patients diagnosed with LARC from January 2013 to December 2020 and included those aged 70 years or older. Patients were categorized into three groups based on their treatment strategies: neoadjuvant HCRT (33 or 35 Gy in 10 fractions), neoadjuvant LCRT, and upfront surgery. Comparative analyses were performed on clinicopathological characteristics, short-term outcomes, and long-term survival outcomes among these groups. : Among the 296 patients included, 30 (10.1%) received HCRT, 195 (65.9%) underwent standard LCRT, and 71 (24.0%) underwent upfront surgery. The baseline characteristics showed that the HCRT group had a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (ASA score 3 or 4, HCRT 43.3% vs. LCRT 16.9% vs. upfront surgery 15.5%, = 0.002). The HCRT group showed a significantly lower incidence of radiotherapy-related complications than the LCRT group (16.7% vs. 48.7%, = 0.001). However, the rate of pathological complete response was significantly lower in the HCRT group (10.0% vs. 15.4%, = 0.002). The 3-year relapse-free survival (83.0% vs. 77.2% vs. 83.2%; = 0.411), 3-year local recurrence-free survival (93.1% vs. 93.2% vs. 93.5%; = 0.464), and 5-year overall survival (65.1% vs. 67.0% vs. 67.7%; = 0.682) were not significantly different between the three groups. Multivariate analysis also showed that the treatment strategy was not associated with survival outcomes. : Neoadjuvant HCRT demonstrated reduced radiotherapy-related complications and acceptable long-term oncologic outcomes. Therefore, neoadjuvant HCRT may be considered as a viable alternative for elderly patients with LARC.

摘要

对于局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)老年患者,应用长程放化疗(LCRT)可能具有挑战性,因为合并症相关并发症风险增加且功能状态下降。本研究旨在评估新辅助低分割放化疗(HCRT)在中低位LARC老年患者中的疗效。我们对2013年1月至2020年12月诊断为LARC的患者进行了回顾性研究,纳入年龄在70岁及以上的患者。根据治疗策略将患者分为三组:新辅助HCRT(10次分割,每次33或35 Gy)、新辅助LCRT和直接手术。对这些组的临床病理特征、短期结局和长期生存结局进行了比较分析。在纳入的296例患者中,30例(10.1%)接受了HCRT,195例(65.9%)接受了标准LCRT,71例(24.0%)接受了直接手术。基线特征显示,HCRT组美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分较高(ASA评分3或4,HCRT组为43.3%,LCRT组为16.9%,直接手术组为15.5%,P = 0.002)。HCRT组放疗相关并发症的发生率显著低于LCRT组(16.7%对48.7%,P = 0.001)。然而,HCRT组的病理完全缓解率显著较低(10.0%对15.4%,P = 0.002)。三组之间的3年无复发生存率(83.0%对77.2%对83.2%;P = 0.411)、3年局部无复发生存率(93.1%对93.2%对93.5%;P = 0.464)和5年总生存率(65.1%对67.0%对67.7%;P = 0.682)无显著差异。多因素分析还显示,治疗策略与生存结局无关。新辅助HCRT显示放疗相关并发症减少,长期肿瘤学结局可接受。因此,新辅助HCRT可被视为LARC老年患者的一种可行替代方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bb2/11674216/713302953b2e/cancers-16-04280-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验