Suppr超能文献

聚乙二醇电解质散剂灌肠——是否需要使用甲氧氯普胺?

Golytely lavage--is metoclopramide necessary?

作者信息

Brady C E, DiPalma J A, Pierson W P

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 1985 Mar;80(3):180-4.

PMID:3976636
Abstract

During Golytely cleansing for colonoscopy, two dose forms of oral metoclopramide were evaluated in separate studies for patient tolerance and adequacy of preparation. In study 1, patients were randomized to 10 mg metoclopramide (n = 21) or placebo (n = 27); in study 2, 20 mg metoclopramide (n = 21) was compared to placebo (n = 25). Ten milligrams metoclopramide was not significantly different from placebo in patient acceptance for any of the assessed symptoms. Patients taking 20 mg metoclopramide had less cramping (p = 0.02), but more nausea (p = 0.03) than placebo. Time for rectal effluent to clear was similar in all groups. The percentage of patients preferring Golytely was similar in both studies (70-79%, p = NS) and 85% of all patients were willing to repeat Golytely. Physician assessment of colon cleansing showed no difference between metoclopramide or placebo in either study, with adequate preparations in 97% and optimal cleansing in 80% of all patients. Neither 10 nor 20 mg oral metoclopramide improved adequacy of colon cleansing for colonoscopy or decreased symptoms associated with Golytely lavage.

摘要

在结肠镜检查前进行聚乙二醇电解质散(Golytely)清肠期间,在两项单独的研究中评估了两种剂型的口服甲氧氯普胺,以观察患者耐受性和清肠准备的充分性。在研究1中,患者被随机分为服用10毫克甲氧氯普胺组(n = 21)或安慰剂组(n = 27);在研究2中,将20毫克甲氧氯普胺组(n = 21)与安慰剂组(n = 25)进行比较。对于任何评估的症状,10毫克甲氧氯普胺在患者接受度方面与安慰剂无显著差异。服用20毫克甲氧氯普胺的患者绞痛较少(p = 0.02),但恶心比安慰剂组更多(p = 0.03)。所有组直肠流出物变清的时间相似。两项研究中更喜欢聚乙二醇电解质散的患者百分比相似(70 - 79%,p = 无显著性差异),并且所有患者中有85%愿意再次使用聚乙二醇电解质散。医生对结肠清洁的评估显示,在两项研究中,甲氧氯普胺组和安慰剂组之间没有差异,所有患者中有97%准备充分,80%达到最佳清洁效果。10毫克和20毫克口服甲氧氯普胺均未改善结肠镜检查时结肠清洁的充分性,也未减轻与聚乙二醇电解质散灌洗相关的症状。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验