Migliore Simone, De Angelis Marco, Di Pompeo Ilaria, Lozzi Daniele, Marcaccio Martina, Curcio Giuseppe
Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.
Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.
Brain Sci. 2024 Dec 19;14(12):1276. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14121276.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Aging is associated with both cognitive and physical decline. Some factors, such as lifestyle and environment, can significantly contribute to accelerating or slowing down the decline processes. Our study aimed to evaluate the impact of lifestyle (active vs. non-active) and environmental context (institutionalized vs. non-institutionalized) on the cognitive functioning, psychological well-being, sleep quality, and daily living skills of elderly people.
Our sample consisted of 182 subjects divided into active and non-active groups (subjects who engage or not in physical and social activities, respectively; mean age in years: 67.19 vs. 68.75) and 245 subjects divided into institutionalized and non-institutionalized groups (i.e., living in a nursing home or not, respectively; mean age in years: 79.49 vs. 71.72). Participants were enrolled voluntarily and randomly in the city of L'Aquila. A battery of psychological instruments was administered to evaluate general cognitive decline, depressive symptoms, self-assessed sleep quality, and daily living skills.
Regarding lifestyle, the active group exhibited significantly lower levels of depression, better sleep quality, and daily living skills with respect to the non-active group. Regarding environmental context, institutionalized subjects showed higher levels of depression and reduced cognitive functioning, which were linked to reduced sleep quality and worsened daily living skills. When comparing the non-active with the institutionalized group, the latter showed higher levels of depression and reduced cognitive functioning, more sleep complaints, and reduced daily living skills.
Our study highlights that an active lifestyle and a non-institutionalized environment, both allowing greater mobility and autonomy, are two factors that positively contribute to the mental and physical well-being of elderly individuals. Furthermore, the healthcare institution context appears to have a greater negative impact on the psycho-physical well-being of the subjects involved compared to a non-active lifestyle.
背景/目的:衰老与认知和身体机能衰退相关。一些因素,如生活方式和环境,可显著影响衰退进程的加速或减缓。我们的研究旨在评估生活方式(活跃与不活跃)和环境背景(机构化与非机构化)对老年人认知功能、心理健康、睡眠质量和日常生活技能的影响。
我们的样本包括182名受试者,分为活跃组和不活跃组(分别为参与或不参与体育和社交活动的受试者;平均年龄:67.19岁对68.75岁),以及245名受试者,分为机构化组和非机构化组(即分别居住在养老院与否;平均年龄:79.49岁对71.72岁)。参与者在拉奎拉市自愿且随机入组。使用一系列心理测试工具来评估一般认知衰退、抑郁症状、自我评估的睡眠质量和日常生活技能。
关于生活方式,活跃组在抑郁水平、睡眠质量和日常生活技能方面显著低于不活跃组。关于环境背景,机构化受试者表现出更高的抑郁水平和认知功能下降,这与睡眠质量下降和日常生活技能恶化有关。将不活跃组与机构化组进行比较时,后者表现出更高的抑郁水平和认知功能下降、更多的睡眠问题投诉以及日常生活技能下降。
我们的研究强调,积极的生活方式和非机构化环境,两者都允许更大的活动能力和自主性,是对老年人身心健康有积极贡献的两个因素。此外,与不活跃的生活方式相比,医疗机构环境似乎对相关受试者的身心健康有更大的负面影响。