• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于复杂网络关键节点识别的多属性决策方法。

A Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Approach for Critical Node Identification in Complex Networks.

作者信息

Zhao Xinyun, Zhang Yongheng, Zhai Qingying, Zhang Jinrui, Qi Lanlan

机构信息

Electronic Engineering Institute, National University of Defense Technology, Hefei 230037, China.

Institute of Mathematics, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230601, China.

出版信息

Entropy (Basel). 2024 Dec 9;26(12):1075. doi: 10.3390/e26121075.

DOI:10.3390/e26121075
PMID:39766704
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11675182/
Abstract

Correctly identifying influential nodes in a complex network and implementing targeted protection measures can significantly enhance the overall security of the network. Currently, indicators such as degree centrality, closeness centrality, betweenness centrality, H-index, and K-shell are commonly used to measure node influence. Although these indicators can identify critical nodes to some extent, they often consider node attributes from a narrow perspective and have certain limitations. Therefore, evaluating the importance of nodes using most existing indicators remains incomplete. In this paper, we propose the multi-attribute CRITIC-TOPSIS network decision indicator, or MCTNDI, which integrates closeness centrality, betweenness centrality, H-index, and network constraint coefficients to identify critical nodes in a network. This indicator combines information from multiple perspectives, including local neighborhood importance, network topological location, path centrality, and node mutual information, thereby solving the issue of the one-sided perspective of single indicators and providing a more comprehensive measure of node importance. Additionally, MCTNDI is validated through the analysis of several real-world networks, including the Contiguous USA network, Dolphins network, USAir97 network, and Tech-routers-rf network. The validation is conducted from four aspects: the results of simulated network attacks, the distribution of node importance, the monotonicity of rankings, and the similarity of indicators, illustrating MCTNDI's effectiveness in real networks.

摘要

正确识别复杂网络中的有影响力节点并实施针对性保护措施,可显著提高网络的整体安全性。目前,度中心性、接近中心性、中介中心性、H指数和K壳等指标常用于衡量节点影响力。尽管这些指标能在一定程度上识别关键节点,但它们往往从狭隘的角度考虑节点属性,存在一定局限性。因此,使用大多数现有指标评估节点重要性仍不完整。在本文中,我们提出了多属性CRITIC-TOPSIS网络决策指标(MCTNDI),它整合了接近中心性、中介中心性、H指数和网络约束系数来识别网络中的关键节点。该指标结合了来自多个视角的信息,包括局部邻域重要性、网络拓扑位置、路径中心性和节点互信息,从而解决了单一指标视角片面的问题,并提供了更全面的节点重要性度量。此外,通过对几个真实网络的分析对MCTNDI进行了验证,包括美国 contiguous 网络、海豚网络、USAir97网络和技术路由器射频网络。验证从模拟网络攻击结果、节点重要性分布、排名单调性和指标相似性四个方面进行,说明了MCTNDI在真实网络中的有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f86f/11675182/961a5e679d48/entropy-26-01075-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f86f/11675182/ede5288fa2dc/entropy-26-01075-g0A1a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f86f/11675182/1207f4094a08/entropy-26-01075-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f86f/11675182/698ed05219d1/entropy-26-01075-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f86f/11675182/492d58383bed/entropy-26-01075-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f86f/11675182/2f4b5d6070dc/entropy-26-01075-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f86f/11675182/ec1e5ffc4ace/entropy-26-01075-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f86f/11675182/3f3f86eac12e/entropy-26-01075-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f86f/11675182/2fdcef80a028/entropy-26-01075-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f86f/11675182/961a5e679d48/entropy-26-01075-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f86f/11675182/ede5288fa2dc/entropy-26-01075-g0A1a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f86f/11675182/1207f4094a08/entropy-26-01075-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f86f/11675182/698ed05219d1/entropy-26-01075-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f86f/11675182/492d58383bed/entropy-26-01075-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f86f/11675182/2f4b5d6070dc/entropy-26-01075-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f86f/11675182/ec1e5ffc4ace/entropy-26-01075-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f86f/11675182/3f3f86eac12e/entropy-26-01075-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f86f/11675182/2fdcef80a028/entropy-26-01075-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f86f/11675182/961a5e679d48/entropy-26-01075-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
A Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Approach for Critical Node Identification in Complex Networks.一种用于复杂网络关键节点识别的多属性决策方法。
Entropy (Basel). 2024 Dec 9;26(12):1075. doi: 10.3390/e26121075.
2
Security-centric node identification in complex networks.复杂网络中以安全性为中心的节点识别
Sci Rep. 2025 May 4;15(1):15568. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-00360-4.
3
Investigating critical node identification in water networks through distance Laplacian energy centrality.通过距离拉普拉斯能量中心性研究水网络中的关键节点识别
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2025 Mar;32(11):6505-6531. doi: 10.1007/s11356-025-36118-8. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
4
Identifying Important Nodes in Complex Networks Based on Node Propagation Entropy.基于节点传播熵识别复杂网络中的重要节点
Entropy (Basel). 2022 Feb 14;24(2):275. doi: 10.3390/e24020275.
5
Computing Influential Nodes Using the Nearest Neighborhood Trust Value and PageRank in Complex Networks.利用复杂网络中的最近邻信任值和PageRank算法计算有影响力的节点
Entropy (Basel). 2022 May 16;24(5):704. doi: 10.3390/e24050704.
6
Multi-attribute integrated measurement of node importance in complex networks.复杂网络中节点重要性的多属性综合度量
Chaos. 2015 Nov;25(11):113105. doi: 10.1063/1.4935285.
7
Influential nodes identification for complex networks based on multi-feature fusion.基于多特征融合的复杂网络中有影响力节点识别
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 3;15(1):11440. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-94193-w.
8
A measure of local uniqueness to identify linchpins in a social network with node attributes.一种用于识别具有节点属性的社交网络中关键节点的局部独特性度量方法。
Appl Netw Sci. 2021;6. doi: 10.1007/s41109-021-00400-8. Epub 2021 Jul 17.
9
A network perspective on the topological importance of enzymes and their phylogenetic conservation.从网络角度看酶的拓扑重要性及其系统发育保守性。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2007 Apr 11;8:121. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-121.
10
Identifying influential nodes in complex networks using a gravity model based on the H-index method.基于H指数法的引力模型在复杂网络中识别有影响力节点
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 29;13(1):16404. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43585-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Identification of nodes influence based on global structure model in complex networks.基于复杂网络全局结构模型的节点影响识别。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 17;11(1):6173. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84684-x.
2
Identifying vital nodes in complex networks by adjacency information entropy.基于邻接信息熵识别复杂网络中的关键节点。
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 14;10(1):2691. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-59616-w.
3
Resistance and Security Index of Networks: Structural Information Perspective of Network Security.网络的抵抗和安全索引:网络安全的结构信息视角。
Sci Rep. 2016 Jun 3;6:26810. doi: 10.1038/srep26810.
4
The H-index of a network node and its relation to degree and coreness.网络节点的H指数及其与度和核数的关系。
Nat Commun. 2016 Jan 12;7:10168. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10168.
5
Identifying influential nodes in large-scale directed networks: the role of clustering.识别大规模有向网络中的影响节点:聚类的作用。
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 31;8(10):e77455. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077455. eCollection 2013.
6
Identifying influential and susceptible members of social networks.识别社交网络中的有影响力和易感染成员。
Science. 2012 Jul 20;337(6092):337-41. doi: 10.1126/science.1215842. Epub 2012 Jun 21.
7
Betweenness centrality correlation in social networks.社交网络中的中介中心性相关性。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2003 Jan;67(1 Pt 2):017101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.67.017101. Epub 2003 Jan 13.
8
Emergence of scaling in random networks.随机网络中幂律分布的出现。
Science. 1999 Oct 15;286(5439):509-12. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5439.509.