• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

识别社交网络中的有影响力和易感染成员。

Identifying influential and susceptible members of social networks.

机构信息

Stern School of Business, New York University, New York, NY 10012, USA.

出版信息

Science. 2012 Jul 20;337(6092):337-41. doi: 10.1126/science.1215842. Epub 2012 Jun 21.

DOI:10.1126/science.1215842
PMID:22722253
Abstract

Identifying social influence in networks is critical to understanding how behaviors spread. We present a method that uses in vivo randomized experimentation to identify influence and susceptibility in networks while avoiding the biases inherent in traditional estimates of social contagion. Estimation in a representative sample of 1.3 million Facebook users showed that younger users are more susceptible to influence than older users, men are more influential than women, women influence men more than they influence other women, and married individuals are the least susceptible to influence in the decision to adopt the product offered. Analysis of influence and susceptibility together with network structure revealed that influential individuals are less susceptible to influence than noninfluential individuals and that they cluster in the network while susceptible individuals do not, which suggests that influential people with influential friends may be instrumental in the spread of this product in the network.

摘要

识别网络中的社会影响对于理解行为传播至关重要。我们提出了一种方法,该方法使用体内随机实验来识别网络中的影响和易感性,同时避免了传统社会传染估计中固有的偏差。在对 130 万 Facebook 用户的代表性样本进行估计时,结果表明,年轻用户比老年用户更容易受到影响,男性比女性更有影响力,女性对男性的影响大于对其他女性的影响,而已婚人士在决定是否采用所提供的产品时最不容易受到影响。对影响和易感性以及网络结构的综合分析表明,有影响力的个体比无影响力的个体更不容易受到影响,而且他们在网络中聚集,而易感个体则不会,这表明具有有影响力的朋友的有影响力的人可能是该产品在网络中传播的重要因素。

相似文献

1
Identifying influential and susceptible members of social networks.识别社交网络中的有影响力和易感染成员。
Science. 2012 Jul 20;337(6092):337-41. doi: 10.1126/science.1215842. Epub 2012 Jun 21.
2
Me and my 400 friends: the anatomy of college students' Facebook networks, their communication patterns, and well-being.我和我的 400 位好友:大学生的 Facebook 网络解剖、他们的沟通模式与幸福感。
Dev Psychol. 2012 Mar;48(2):369-80. doi: 10.1037/a0026338. Epub 2012 Jan 30.
3
An experimental study of homophily in the adoption of health behavior.同群现象在健康行为采用中的实验研究。
Science. 2011 Dec 2;334(6060):1269-72. doi: 10.1126/science.1207055.
4
How do friends influence smoking uptake? Findings from qualitative interviews with identical twins.朋友如何影响吸烟行为的养成?对同卵双胞胎进行定性访谈的结果
J Genet Psychol. 2008 Jun;169(2):117-31. doi: 10.3200/GNTP.169.2.117-132.
5
Real and perceived attitude agreement in social networks.社交网络中的真实态度与感知态度一致性。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Oct;99(4):611-21. doi: 10.1037/a0020697.
6
Social network effects in contraceptive behavior among adolescents.青少年避孕行为中的社交网络效应。
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2011 Oct;32(8):563-71. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e318231cf03.
7
Adolescent alcohol-related risk cognitions: the roles of social norms and social networking sites.青少年与酒精相关的风险认知:社会规范和社交网站的作用。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2011 Dec;25(4):708-13. doi: 10.1037/a0024226. Epub 2011 Jun 6.
8
Friendship networks and trajectories of adolescent tobacco use.青少年烟草使用的友谊网络和轨迹。
Addict Behav. 2010 Jul;35(7):678-85. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.02.013. Epub 2010 Mar 3.
9
Altruism in social networks: evidence for a 'kinship premium'.社交网络中的利他主义:“亲缘溢价”的证据。
Br J Psychol. 2013 May;104(2):283-95. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2012.02119.x. Epub 2012 May 24.
10
The impact of gendered friendship patterns on the prevalence of homophobia among belgian late adolescents.性别化的友谊模式对比利时青少年后期恐同症流行率的影响。
Arch Sex Behav. 2011 Jun;40(3):543-50. doi: 10.1007/s10508-010-9635-y. Epub 2010 Jun 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhanced complex network influential node detection through the integration of entropy and degree metrics with node distance.通过熵、度指标与节点距离的整合实现增强的复杂网络影响节点检测
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 25;15(1):31227. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-15968-9.
2
The peer paradox: Perspectives from HIV service providers to inform the implementation of an enhanced social network strategy for black sexual and gender minorities-a qualitative study.同伴悖论:来自艾滋病毒服务提供者的观点,为黑人性少数群体和性别少数群体实施强化社交网络策略提供参考——一项定性研究
Implement Sci Commun. 2025 Apr 23;6(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s43058-025-00736-7.
3
Heterogeneous update processes shape information cascades in social networks.
异质更新过程塑造了社交网络中的信息级联。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 22;15(1):13999. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-97809-3.
4
A Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Approach for Critical Node Identification in Complex Networks.一种用于复杂网络关键节点识别的多属性决策方法。
Entropy (Basel). 2024 Dec 9;26(12):1075. doi: 10.3390/e26121075.
5
Indirect social influence and diffusion of innovations: An experimental approach.间接社会影响与创新传播:一种实验方法。
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Oct 1;3(10):pgae409. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae409. eCollection 2024 Oct.
6
Beyond network centrality: individual-level behavioral traits for predicting information superspreaders in social media.超越网络中心性:预测社交媒体中信息超级传播者的个体层面行为特征。
Natl Sci Rev. 2024 Mar 1;11(7):nwae073. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwae073. eCollection 2024 Jul.
7
Individual-centralized seeding strategy for influence maximization in information-limited networks.信息受限网络中基于个体中心的影响力最大化种子策略。
J R Soc Interface. 2024 May;21(214):20230625. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2023.0625. Epub 2024 May 8.
8
Exploring the medical decision-making patterns and influencing factors among the general Chinese public: a binary logistic regression analysis.探讨中国普通公众的医疗决策模式和影响因素:二元逻辑回归分析。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Mar 25;24(1):887. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18338-8.
9
Mapping Teacher Informal Advice Networks as a Tool for District Administrators: A Case Study.绘制教师非正式建议网络作为学区管理人员的工具:一项案例研究。
Sci Educ (Arlingt). 2023 Spring;29(1):1-11.
10
"Chatting with ChatGPT": Analyzing the factors influencing users' intention to Use the Open AI's ChatGPT using the UTAUT model.“与ChatGPT聊天”:运用UTAUT模型分析影响用户使用OpenAI的ChatGPT意愿的因素。
Heliyon. 2023 Oct 18;9(11):e20962. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20962. eCollection 2023 Nov.