Suppr超能文献

利用电子鼻检测技术区分大豆中霉菌水平的有效性

Effectiveness of Differentiating Mold Levels in Soybeans with Electronic Nose Detection Technology.

作者信息

Song Xuejian, Qian Lili, Zhang Dongjie, Wang Xinhui, Fu Lixue, Chen Mingming

机构信息

College of Food Science, Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, Daqing 163319, China.

Key Laboratory of Agro-Products Processing and Quality Safety of Heilongjiang Province, Daqing 163319, China.

出版信息

Foods. 2024 Dec 17;13(24):4064. doi: 10.3390/foods13244064.

Abstract

This study employed electronic nose technology to assess the mold levels in soybeans, conducting analyses on artificially inoculated soybeans with five strains of fungi and distinguishing them from naturally moldy soybeans. Principal component analysis (PCA) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) were used to evaluate inoculated and naturally moldy samples. The results revealed that the most influential sensor was W2W, which is sensitive to organic sulfur compounds, followed by W1W (primarily responsive to inorganic sulfur compounds), W5S (sensitive to small molecular nitrogen oxides), W1S (responsive to short-chain alkanes such as methane), and W2S (sensitive to alcohols, ethers, aldehydes, and ketones). These findings highlight that variations in volatile substances among the moldy soybean samples were predominantly attributed to organic sulfur compounds, with significant distinctions noted in inorganic sulfur, nitrogen compounds, short-chain alkanes, and alcohols/ethers/aldehydes/ketones. The results of the PCA and LDA analyses indicated that while both methods demonstrated moderate effectiveness in distinguishing between different dominant fungal inoculations and naturally moldy soybeans, they were more successful in differentiating various levels of moldiness, achieving a discriminative accuracy rate of 82.72% in LDA. Overall, the findings suggest that electronic nose detection technology can effectively identify mold levels in soybeans.

摘要

本研究采用电子鼻技术评估大豆中的霉菌水平,对人工接种五种真菌菌株的大豆进行分析,并将其与天然发霉大豆区分开来。主成分分析(PCA)和线性判别分析(LDA)用于评估接种和天然发霉的样品。结果表明,最具影响力的传感器是W2W,它对有机硫化合物敏感,其次是W1W(主要对无机硫化合物有响应)、W5S(对小分子氮氧化物敏感)、W1S(对甲烷等短链烷烃有响应)和W2S(对醇、醚、醛和酮敏感)。这些发现突出表明,发霉大豆样品中挥发性物质的变化主要归因于有机硫化合物,在无机硫、氮化合物、短链烷烃以及醇/醚/醛/酮方面存在显著差异。PCA和LDA分析结果表明,虽然这两种方法在区分不同优势真菌接种和天然发霉大豆方面都显示出一定效果,但在区分不同发霉程度方面更为成功,LDA的判别准确率达到82.72%。总体而言,研究结果表明电子鼻检测技术可以有效识别大豆中的霉菌水平。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验