• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于瑟斯顿项目反应理论 (TIRT) 开发的迫选式人格量表。

Development of a Forced-Choice Personality Inventory via Thurstonian Item Response Theory (TIRT).

作者信息

Tsaousis Ioannis, Al-Owidha Amjed

机构信息

Department of Psychology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15784 Athens, Greece.

Education & Training Evaluation Commission, Riyadh 12395, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Nov 21;14(12):1118. doi: 10.3390/bs14121118.

DOI:10.3390/bs14121118
PMID:39767259
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11673971/
Abstract

This study had two purposes: (1) to develop a forced-choice personality inventory to assess student personality characteristics based on the five-factor (FFM) personality model and (2) to examine its factor structure via the Thurstonian Item Response Theory (TIRT) approach based on Thurstone's law of comparative judgment. A total of 200 items were generated to represent the five dimensions, and through Principal Axis Factoring and the composite reliability index, a final pool of 75 items was selected. These items were then organized into 25 blocks, each containing three statements (triplets) designed to balance social desirability across the blocks. The study involved two samples: the first sample of 1484 students was used to refine the item pool, and the second sample of 823 university students was used to examine the factorial structure of the forced-choice inventory. After re-coding the responses into a binary format, the data were analyzed within a standard structural equation modeling (SEM) framework. Then, the TIRT model was applied to evaluate the factorial structure of the forced-choice inventory, with the results indicating an adequate fit. Further suggestions for future research with additional studies are provided to justify the scale's reliability (e.g., test-retest) and validity (e.g., concurrent, convergent, and divergent).

摘要

本研究有两个目的

(1)开发一种强制选择性格量表,以基于五因素(FFM)人格模型评估学生的性格特征;(2)通过基于瑟斯顿比较判断定律的瑟斯顿项目反应理论(TIRT)方法检验其因素结构。总共生成了200个项目来代表五个维度,并通过主成分因子分析和综合信度指数,最终选取了75个项目。然后将这些项目组织成25个模块,每个模块包含三个陈述(三元组),旨在平衡各模块间的社会期望性。该研究涉及两个样本:第一个样本为1484名学生,用于完善项目库;第二个样本为823名大学生,用于检验强制选择量表的因子结构。将回答重新编码为二元格式后,在标准结构方程模型(SEM)框架内对数据进行分析。然后,应用TIRT模型评估强制选择量表的因子结构,结果表明拟合良好。还提供了对未来进一步研究的建议,以证明该量表的信度(如重测信度)和效度(如同时效度、聚合效度和区分效度)。

相似文献

1
Development of a Forced-Choice Personality Inventory via Thurstonian Item Response Theory (TIRT).基于瑟斯顿项目反应理论 (TIRT) 开发的迫选式人格量表。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Nov 21;14(12):1118. doi: 10.3390/bs14121118.
2
On the Validity of Forced Choice Scores Derived From the Thurstonian Item Response Theory Model.从 Thurstonian 项目反应理论模型得出的强迫选择分数的有效性。
Assessment. 2020 Jun;27(4):706-718. doi: 10.1177/1073191119843585. Epub 2019 Apr 21.
3
Fitting a Thurstonian IRT model to forced-choice data using Mplus.使用 Mplus 拟合迫选数据的 Thurstonian IRT 模型。
Behav Res Methods. 2012 Dec;44(4):1135-47. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0217-x.
4
Forced-Choice Assessment of Work-Related Maladaptive Personality Traits: Preliminary Evidence From an Application of Thurstonian Item Response Modeling.工作相关适应不良人格特质的迫选评估:特伦斯项目反应建模应用的初步证据。
Assessment. 2018 Jun;25(4):513-526. doi: 10.1177/1073191116641181. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
5
Linear Factor Analytic Thurstonian Forced-Choice Models: Current Status and Issues.线性因素分析瑟斯顿迫选模型:现状与问题
Educ Psychol Meas. 2024 Aug;84(4):660-690. doi: 10.1177/00131644231205011. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
6
How IRT can solve problems of ipsative data in forced-choice questionnaires.IRT 如何解决多选题问卷中自比数据的问题。
Psychol Methods. 2013 Mar;18(1):36-52. doi: 10.1037/a0030641. Epub 2012 Nov 12.
7
The Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Forced-Choice Format Character Measure: Testing the Thurstonian IRT Approach.多维迫选格式特质量表的编制与验证:测试 Thurstonian IRT 方法。
J Pers Assess. 2021 Mar-Apr;103(2):224-237. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2020.1739056. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
8
Integration of the Forced-Choice Questionnaire and the Likert Scale: A Simulation Study.强制选择问卷与李克特量表的整合:一项模拟研究。
Front Psychol. 2017 May 18;8:806. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00806. eCollection 2017.
9
Controlling for Response Biases in Self-Report Scales: Forced-Choice vs. Psychometric Modeling of Likert Items.控制自我报告量表中的反应偏差:迫选法与李克特项目的心理测量模型
Front Psychol. 2019 Oct 15;10:2309. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02309. eCollection 2019.
10
The Motivational Value Systems Questionnaire (MVSQ): Psychometric Analysis Using a Forced Choice Thurstonian IRT Model.动机价值系统问卷(MVSQ):使用强制选择瑟斯顿IRT模型的心理测量分析
Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 20;8:1626. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01626. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

1
Though Forced, Still Valid: Examining the Psychometric Performance of Forced-Choice Measurement of Personality in Children and Adolescents.
Assessment. 2025 Jun;32(4):521-543. doi: 10.1177/10731911241255841. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
2
Contributions to Constructing Forced-Choice Questionnaires Using the Thurstonian IRT Model.运用 Thurstonian IRT 模型构建选择题问卷的贡献
Multivariate Behav Res. 2024 Mar-Apr;59(2):229-250. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2023.2248979. Epub 2023 Sep 30.
3
Estimating and Using Block Information in the Thurstonian IRT Model.在 Thurstonian IRT 模型中估计和使用区块信息。
Psychometrika. 2023 Dec;88(4):1556-1589. doi: 10.1007/s11336-023-09931-8. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
4
Thinking thrice about sum scores, and then some more about measurement and analysis.再三思考总和分数,然后再进一步思考测量和分析。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Feb;55(2):788-806. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01849-w. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
5
On the Statistical and Practical Limitations of Thurstonian IRT Models.关于瑟斯顿IRT模型的统计及实际局限性
Educ Psychol Meas. 2019 Oct;79(5):827-854. doi: 10.1177/0013164419832063. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
6
Does forcing reduce faking? A meta-analytic review of forced-choice personality measures in high-stakes situations.强迫是否会减少伪装?高风险情境下迫选人格测验的元分析综述。
J Appl Psychol. 2019 Nov;104(11):1347-1368. doi: 10.1037/apl0000414. Epub 2019 May 9.
7
On the Validity of Forced Choice Scores Derived From the Thurstonian Item Response Theory Model.从 Thurstonian 项目反应理论模型得出的强迫选择分数的有效性。
Assessment. 2020 Jun;27(4):706-718. doi: 10.1177/1073191119843585. Epub 2019 Apr 21.
8
Influence of Context on Item Parameters in Forced-Choice Personality Assessments.情境对迫选式人格评估中项目参数的影响。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2017 Jun;77(3):389-414. doi: 10.1177/0013164416646162. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
9
Thanks coefficient alpha, we'll take it from here.谢谢克朗巴哈系数,接下来我们自己来。
Psychol Methods. 2018 Sep;23(3):412-433. doi: 10.1037/met0000144. Epub 2017 May 29.
10
Forced-Choice Assessment of Work-Related Maladaptive Personality Traits: Preliminary Evidence From an Application of Thurstonian Item Response Modeling.工作相关适应不良人格特质的迫选评估:特伦斯项目反应建模应用的初步证据。
Assessment. 2018 Jun;25(4):513-526. doi: 10.1177/1073191116641181. Epub 2016 Apr 7.