Li Wen, Guan Lili
School of Psychology, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China.
Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Brain Development, Changchun 130024, China.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Nov 22;14(12):1121. doi: 10.3390/bs14121121.
Fairness-related decision-making often involves a conflict between egoistic and prosocial motives. Previous research based on Terror Management Theory (TMT) indicates that mortality salience can promote both selfish and prosocial behaviors, leaving its effect on fairness-related decision-making uncertain. This study integrates TMT with the strength model of self-control to investigate the effects of mortality salience on fairness-related decision-making and to examine the moderating role of dispositional self-control. Participants were primed with either mortality salience or negative affect and then asked to make a series of binary choices (equal allocation vs. unequal allocation favoring themselves) to distribute monetary resources. In both studies, mortality salience heightened selfish tendencies, leading to less equitable monetary allocation. Study 2 further revealed that this effect occurred among participants with low, but not high, self-control. These findings indicate that mortality salience promotes selfishness and inequitable monetary allocation, but that self-control can buffer these effects.
与公平相关的决策通常涉及利己动机和亲社会动机之间的冲突。以往基于恐惧管理理论(TMT)的研究表明,死亡凸显可以促进自私行为和亲社会行为,但其对与公平相关决策的影响尚不确定。本研究将恐惧管理理论与自我控制强度模型相结合,以调查死亡凸显对与公平相关决策的影响,并检验特质自我控制的调节作用。向参与者启动死亡凸显或消极情绪,然后要求他们做出一系列二元选择(平等分配与有利于自己的不平等分配)来分配货币资源。在两项研究中,死亡凸显都增强了自私倾向,导致货币分配更不公平。研究2进一步表明,这种效应发生在自我控制能力低而非高的参与者中。这些发现表明,死亡凸显会促进自私和不公平的货币分配,但自我控制可以缓冲这些影响。