• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Political Affiliation, Policy Measures, and Intention to Receive COVID-19 and Influenza Vaccines.政治归属、政策措施以及接种新冠疫苗和流感疫苗的意愿
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Nov 30;21(12):1608. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21121608.
2
Predictors of willingness to receive updated 2023-2024 COVID-19 booster vaccines among a convenience sample in Minnesota.明尼苏达州便利样本中愿意接种 2023-2024 年更新版 COVID-19 加强疫苗人群的预测因素。
Vaccine. 2024 May 31;42(15):3499-3504. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.04.053. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
3
Editor's Choice: Influenza vaccine uptake, COVID-19 vaccination intention and vaccine hesitancy among nurses: A survey.编辑推荐:护士群体中的流感疫苗接种率、新冠疫苗接种意愿及疫苗犹豫情况:一项调查
Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Feb;114:103854. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103854. Epub 2020 Dec 5.
4
Association between community-level political affiliation and peripartum vaccination.社区层面政治派别与围产期疫苗接种的关联。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Aug;5(8):101007. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101007. Epub 2023 May 6.
5
COVID-19 and Parent Intention to Vaccinate Their Children Against Influenza.COVID-19 与家长对子女接种流感疫苗的意愿。
Pediatrics. 2020 Dec;146(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-022871. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
6
Predicting intention to receive COVID-19 vaccine among the general population using the health belief model and the theory of planned behavior model.运用健康信念模型和计划行为理论模型预测普通人群接种新冠疫苗的意愿。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Apr 26;21(1):804. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10816-7.
7
Behavioral Intention to Receive a COVID-19 Vaccination Among Chinese Factory Workers: Cross-sectional Online Survey.中国工厂工人接种 COVID-19 疫苗的行为意愿:横断面在线调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 9;23(3):e24673. doi: 10.2196/24673.
8
The impact of attitude toward COVID-19 vaccine on intention to receive influenza vaccination: a multi-group comparison based on the influence of presumed influence model and spillover effects.对 COVID-19 疫苗的态度对接受流感疫苗意愿的影响:基于预期影响模型和溢出效应的影响的多群组比较。
Front Public Health. 2024 Aug 21;12:1398680. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1398680. eCollection 2024.
9
Influenza vaccination in the time of COVID-19: A national U.S. survey of adults.COVID-19 时期的流感疫苗接种:一项针对美国成年人的全国性调查。
Vaccine. 2021 Apr 1;39(14):1921-1928. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.03.003. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
10
The politics of vaccination: a closer look at the beliefs, social norms, and prevention behaviors related to COVID-19 vaccine uptake within two US political parties.疫苗接种的政治学:深入观察美国两党中与 COVID-19 疫苗接种相关的信仰、社会规范和预防行为。
Psychol Health Med. 2024 Mar;29(3):589-602. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2023.2283401. Epub 2023 Nov 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictors of willingness to receive updated 2023-2024 COVID-19 booster vaccines among a convenience sample in Minnesota.明尼苏达州便利样本中愿意接种 2023-2024 年更新版 COVID-19 加强疫苗人群的预测因素。
Vaccine. 2024 May 31;42(15):3499-3504. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.04.053. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
2
US state vaccine mandates did not influence COVID-19 vaccination rates but reduced uptake of COVID-19 boosters and flu vaccines compared to bans on vaccine restrictions.美国各州的疫苗强制接种令并没有影响 COVID-19 疫苗的接种率,但与取消疫苗接种限制相比,这些命令降低了 COVID-19 加强针和流感疫苗的接种率。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Feb 20;121(8):e2313610121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2313610121. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
3
Impact of Political Leaning on COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: A Network-Based Multiple Mediation Analysis.政治倾向对新冠疫苗犹豫态度的影响:基于网络的多重中介分析
Cureus. 2023 Aug 9;15(8):e43232. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43232. eCollection 2023 Aug.
4
Political Ideology and Trust in Government to Ensure Vaccine Safety: Using a U.S. Survey to Explore the Role of Political Trust.政治意识形态和对政府确保疫苗安全的信任:利用美国调查探讨政治信任的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 2;20(5):4459. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054459.
5
Republicans Die More From COVID-19: Why We Care.共和党人死于新冠病毒的人数更多:我们为何在意。
Am J Public Health. 2023 Apr;113(4):349. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2023.307237.
6
Who Calls the Shots? A Legal and Historical Perspective on Vaccine Mandates.谁在掌控局面?关于疫苗强制令的法律与历史视角
Chest. 2022 Sep;162(3):659-663. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.04.142.
7
Higher Collective Responsibility, Higher COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake, and Interaction with Vaccine Attitude: Results from Propensity Score Matching.更高的集体责任感、更高的新冠疫苗接种率以及与疫苗态度的相互作用:倾向得分匹配的结果
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Aug 10;10(8):1295. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10081295.
8
COVID-19 vaccination mandates and vaccine uptake.COVID-19 疫苗接种授权和疫苗接种率。
Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Dec;6(12):1615-1624. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01363-1. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
9
Vaccination, politics and COVID-19 impacts.疫苗接种、政治与 COVID-19 影响。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jan 14;22(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12432-x.
10
Immunopathology and Immunopathogenesis of COVID-19, what we know and what we should learn.新型冠状病毒肺炎的免疫病理学与免疫发病机制:我们所知与应学
Gene Rep. 2021 Dec;25:101417. doi: 10.1016/j.genrep.2021.101417. Epub 2021 Nov 5.

政治归属、政策措施以及接种新冠疫苗和流感疫苗的意愿

Political Affiliation, Policy Measures, and Intention to Receive COVID-19 and Influenza Vaccines.

作者信息

Ricke Isabel J, Spaulding Alicen B, Rajtar Nickolas N, Lundberg Lauren, Nguyen Ruby H N

机构信息

Division of Epidemiology & Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55454, USA.

Vaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Nov 30;21(12):1608. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21121608.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph21121608
PMID:39767449
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11675663/
Abstract

Our study aimed to assess the impact of political affiliation, personal beliefs, and policy measures on the intention to receive routine COVID-19 and influenza vaccines in the coming year. A cross-sectional study of 1256 individuals at Minnesota State and County Fairs was conducted to assess their intention to receive COVID-19 booster and influenza vaccines in the coming year. The association between vaccine intention and political affiliation, belief in collective responsibility, and workplace/school vaccine requirements were analyzed using multinomial logistic regression. Vaccine intention in the coming year was high among our participants; 65% intended to receive both vaccines, 11% intended to receive only the influenza vaccine, 7% intended to receive only the COVID-19 vaccine, and 17% planned to receive neither. Political affiliation was strongly associated with the intention to receive both vaccines. Republicans were far more likely than Democrats to report plans to receive neither vaccine (aOR: 12.8; 95% CI: 6.2-26.6), or only the influenza vaccine in the coming year (aOR: 8.7; 95% CI: 4.2-17.9). Additionally, those who planned to receive both vaccines were significantly more likely to view vaccines as a collective responsibility. This study highlights the significant influence of political affiliation and beliefs in collective responsibility on vaccine intentions.

摘要

我们的研究旨在评估政治派别、个人信念和政策措施对来年接种常规新冠病毒疫苗和流感疫苗意愿的影响。我们对明尼苏达州州和县集市上的1256人进行了一项横断面研究,以评估他们来年接种新冠病毒加强针和流感疫苗的意愿。使用多项逻辑回归分析了疫苗接种意愿与政治派别、集体责任信念以及工作场所/学校疫苗要求之间的关联。我们的参与者来年接种疫苗的意愿较高;65%的人打算接种两种疫苗,11%的人只打算接种流感疫苗,7%的人只打算接种新冠病毒疫苗,17%的人计划两种疫苗都不接种。政治派别与接种两种疫苗的意愿密切相关。共和党人比民主党人更有可能表示计划来年两种疫苗都不接种(调整优势比:12.8;95%置信区间:6.2 - 26.6),或者只接种流感疫苗(调整优势比:8.7;95%置信区间:4.2 - 17.9)。此外,那些计划接种两种疫苗的人更有可能将疫苗视为一种集体责任。这项研究突出了政治派别和集体责任信念对疫苗接种意愿的重大影响。