• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受侵入性诊断的慢性和急性冠状动脉综合征患者的十年比较结果——来自KORONEF注册研究的见解

Comparative Ten-Year Outcomes in Chronic and Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Undergoing Invasive Diagnostics-Insights from the KORONEF Registry.

作者信息

Kern Adam, Stompór Tomasz, Bojko Krystian, Sienkiewicz Ewa, Pawlak Sebastian, Pawlak Krystyna, Pawlak Dariusz, Poskrobko Grzegorz, Andrasz Ewa, Gromadziński Leszek, Jalali Rakesh, Onichimowski Dariusz, Piwko Grażyna, Zalewski Artur, Bil Jacek

机构信息

Department of Cardiology and Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Collegium Medicum, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-727 Olsztyn, Poland.

Department of Cardiology, Regional Specialist Hospital in Olsztyn, 10-045 Olsztyn, Poland.

出版信息

Biomedicines. 2024 Nov 23;12(12):2672. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12122672.

DOI:10.3390/biomedicines12122672
PMID:39767578
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11726982/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to characterize acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing invasive diagnostics and to evaluate prognostic factors for all-cause mortality over a 10-year follow-up period.

METHODS

The KORONEF study was a prospective, observational, single-center study that enrolled 492 patients, of whom 467 had confirmed coronary artery disease (CAD). Baseline demographic, clinical, laboratory, and procedural data were analyzed, focusing on the differences between ACS and chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) patients.

RESULTS

Males made up the majority of both the CCS and ACS groups (62.2% vs. 63.6%, = 0.773), with no statistically significant difference in patient age between the CCS and ACS subpopulations (64.9 ± 9.5 vs. 63.7 ± 10.3, = 0.106). The 10-year all-cause mortality was 29.8%, with no statistically significant difference between ACS and CCS patients. However, statistically significantly more patients with CCS underwent CABG in the follow-up than ACS patients (9.9% vs. 4.6%, = 0.042). In a multivariable analysis, in the ACS subgroup, statistically significant predictors of all-cause mortality at 10 years included being between 75 and 90 years old (HR 4.99), not having had a previous stroke (HR 0.27), the absence of cardiac arrest (HR 0.20), and a left ventricular ejection fraction > 60% (HR 0.23).

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term outcomes of the ACS patients highlight age and left ventricular function as significant prognostic factors, underscoring the importance of these parameters in risk stratification.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在对接受侵入性诊断的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者进行特征描述,并评估10年随访期内全因死亡率的预后因素。

方法

KORONEF研究是一项前瞻性、观察性、单中心研究,纳入了492例患者,其中467例确诊为冠状动脉疾病(CAD)。分析了基线人口统计学、临床、实验室和手术数据,重点关注ACS患者与慢性冠状动脉综合征(CCS)患者之间的差异。

结果

CCS组和ACS组中男性均占大多数(62.2%对63.6%,P = 0.773),CCS亚组和ACS亚组患者年龄无统计学显著差异(64.9±9.5对63.7±10.3,P = 0.106)。10年全因死亡率为29.8%,ACS患者和CCS患者之间无统计学显著差异。然而,随访中接受冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的CCS患者在统计学上显著多于ACS患者(9.9%对4.6%,P = 0.042)。在多变量分析中,在ACS亚组中,10年全因死亡率的统计学显著预测因素包括年龄在75至90岁之间(风险比[HR]4.99)、既往无中风(HR 0.27)、无心脏骤停(HR 0.20)以及左心室射血分数>60%(HR 0.23)。

结论

ACS患者的长期预后突出了年龄和左心室功能作为重要的预后因素,强调了这些参数在风险分层中的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aff/11726982/308f8081dd90/biomedicines-12-02672-g002a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aff/11726982/745719c9a8d9/biomedicines-12-02672-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aff/11726982/308f8081dd90/biomedicines-12-02672-g002a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aff/11726982/745719c9a8d9/biomedicines-12-02672-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aff/11726982/308f8081dd90/biomedicines-12-02672-g002a.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative Ten-Year Outcomes in Chronic and Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Undergoing Invasive Diagnostics-Insights from the KORONEF Registry.接受侵入性诊断的慢性和急性冠状动脉综合征患者的十年比较结果——来自KORONEF注册研究的见解
Biomedicines. 2024 Nov 23;12(12):2672. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12122672.
2
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery for Left Main Disease in Patients With and Without Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Pooled Analysis of 4 Randomized Clinical Trials.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗伴或不伴急性冠状动脉综合征的左主干病变患者:4 项随机临床试验的汇总分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2023 Jul 1;8(7):631-639. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2023.1177.
3
Ten-Year Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Simultaneous Coronary and Renal Angiography-Does Renal Artery Stenosis Matter?接受冠状动脉和肾动脉同步血管造影术患者的十年预后——肾动脉狭窄有影响吗?
J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 7;13(12):3374. doi: 10.3390/jcm13123374.
4
48-Month Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in an All-Comers Population with Acute Coronary Syndrome and Chronic Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with a Sirolimus-Eluting Stent.接受西罗莫司洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征和慢性冠状动脉综合征所有患者人群的48个月临床结局及预后因素
J Pers Med. 2023 Nov 3;13(11):1573. doi: 10.3390/jpm13111573.
5
Intravascular Lithotripsy in Acute Coronary Syndromes: Procedural and One-Year Clinical Outcomes From the BENELUX-IVL Registry.急性冠状动脉综合征中的血管内碎石术:比荷卢血管内碎石术注册研究的手术及一年临床结果
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Feb;105(2):385-393. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31307. Epub 2024 Nov 24.
6
[Age-related differences in the management and outcome of acute coronary syndrome under the chest pain center model: a multicenter retrospective study].胸痛中心模式下急性冠状动脉综合征管理与结局的年龄相关差异:一项多中心回顾性研究
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Mar;33(3):318-323. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20200806-00565.
7
Acute coronary syndrome and stable coronary artery disease: are they so different? Long-term outcomes in a contemporary PCI cohort.急性冠状动脉综合征和稳定型冠状动脉疾病:它们有那么不同吗?当代经皮冠状动脉介入治疗队列的长期结局。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Aug 20;167(4):1343-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.04.011. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
8
Characteristics, management and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndrome and prior coronary artery bypass surgery: findings from the second Gulf Registry of Acute Coronary Events.急性冠状动脉综合征合并既往冠状动脉搭桥手术患者的特征、管理及预后:第二届海湾急性冠状动脉事件注册研究结果
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011 Dec;13(6):611-8. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2011.274571. Epub 2011 Sep 13.
9
Outcomes of Patients with Normal LDL-Cholesterol at Admission for Acute Coronary Syndromes: Lower Is Not Always Better.急性冠状动脉综合征入院时低密度脂蛋白胆固醇正常患者的预后:并非越低越好。
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024 Apr 15;11(4):120. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11040120.
10
Acute coronary syndrome patterns in the Young: risk factor profile and in-hospital outcomes in a tertiary referral hospital in Kenya.肯尼亚一家三级转诊医院的青年急性冠状动脉综合征模式:危险因素特征和住院结局。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Apr 3;24(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-03832-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Angiographic characteristics of coronary artery disease in patients undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography at a tertiary hospital in Tanzania.坦桑尼亚一家三级医院接受诊断性冠状动脉造影术的患者的冠状动脉疾病的血管造影特征。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Feb 26;24(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-03773-7.
2
2024 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association.2024 年心脏病与中风统计数据:美国心脏协会发布的美国和全球数据报告。
Circulation. 2024 Feb 20;149(8):e347-e913. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001209. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
3
Clinical predictive factors of coronary stenosis in patients with high‑risk valvular heart disease who received diagnostic coronary angiography prior to cardiac valve surgery.
在心脏瓣膜手术前行诊断性冠状动脉造影的高危瓣膜性心脏病患者中冠状动脉狭窄的临床预测因素
Biomed Rep. 2023 Nov 23;20(1):9. doi: 10.3892/br.2023.1697. eCollection 2024 Jan.
4
2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes.2023年欧洲心脏病学会糖尿病患者心血管疾病管理指南
Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 14;44(39):4043-4140. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad192.
5
2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes.2023年欧洲心脏病学会急性冠状动脉综合征管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-3826. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad191.
6
The Comparison of Predicting Factors and Outcomes of MINOCA and STEMI Patients in the 5-Year Follow-Up.5年随访中MINOCA和STEMI患者预测因素及结局的比较
J Pers Med. 2023 May 19;13(5):856. doi: 10.3390/jpm13050856.
7
Predicting Significant Coronary Obstruction in a Population with Suspected Coronary Disease and Absence of Coronary Calcium: CORE-64 / CORE320 Studies.疑似冠心病且无冠状动脉钙化人群中预测显著冠状动脉阻塞:CORE-64/CORE320 研究。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2023 Mar;120(3):e20220183. doi: 10.36660/abc.20220183.
8
Use of cardiac imaging in chronic coronary syndromes: the EURECA Imaging registry.心脏成像在慢性冠状动脉综合征中的应用:EURECA成像注册研究
Eur Heart J. 2023 Jan 7;44(2):142-158. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac640.
9
Management and outcomes over time of acute coronary syndrome patients at particularly high cardiovascular risk : the ACSIS registry-based retrospective study.特定高心血管风险的急性冠脉综合征患者的管理和长期预后:基于 ACSIS 注册的回顾性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 11;12(4):e060953. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-060953.
10
2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2021年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/心血管造影和介入学会冠状动脉血运重建指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南联合委员会报告
Circulation. 2022 Jan 18;145(3):e18-e114. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001038. Epub 2021 Dec 9.