Colonese Francesca, Bulotta Alessandra, Genova Carlo, Signorelli Diego, Bonanno Laura, Proto Claudia, Cortinovis Diego Luigi
Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori di Monza, 20900 Monza, Italy.
Department of Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Biomedicines. 2024 Nov 29;12(12):2742. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12122742.
: The treatment landscape for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has evolved significantly with the advent of immunotherapy. Nonetheless, uncertainty regarding optimal first-line treatments, special populations, and the feasibility of rechallenge remains. This study aims to investigate Italian oncologists' opinions on these aspects through a Delphi Survey. : A steering committee (SC) of six oncologists identified three topics of interest, namely NSCLC (first line) therapeutic choice, NSCLC special populations, and NSCLC immunotherapy rechallenge), and drafted several topic-related statements to be voted in the Delphi Survey by the 61 oncologists forming the Delphi Panel. The survey included two rounds, wherein the experts rated their agreement/disagreement with the statements on a 5-point Likert scale. Consensus was defined as agreement/disagreement by at least 75% of the panel. : The SC drafted 69 statements for the first round, of which 16 (23.2%) met the agreement threshold, 5 (7.2%) met the disagreement threshold, and 48 (69.6%) did not reach consensus. The SC revised the latter statements and drafted 37 for the second round. Overall, 5 (13.5%) statements met the agreement threshold, 1 (2.7%) met the disagreement threshold, and 31 (83.8%) did not reach consensus in the second round. : The survey showed agreement on the necessity of molecular characterization, mutations, smoke, the role of steroid therapy, and immunotherapy rechallenge, and revealed several areas of uncertainty among Italian oncologists on the use of immunotherapy in NSCLC. Statements-where consensus was not met-can be used to guide future clinical research in resolving the issues.
随着免疫疗法的出现,非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的治疗格局发生了显著变化。尽管如此,关于最佳一线治疗方案、特殊人群以及再次挑战的可行性仍存在不确定性。本研究旨在通过德尔菲调查来探究意大利肿瘤学家在这些方面的观点。
一个由六名肿瘤学家组成的指导委员会(SC)确定了三个感兴趣的主题,即NSCLC(一线)治疗选择、NSCLC特殊人群以及NSCLC免疫疗法再次挑战,并起草了若干与主题相关的陈述,供组成德尔菲小组的61名肿瘤学家在德尔菲调查中进行投票。该调查包括两轮,专家们在5点李克特量表上对他们对陈述的同意/不同意程度进行评分。共识定义为至少75%的小组成员同意/不同意。
SC为第一轮起草了69条陈述,其中16条(23.2%)达到了同意阈值,5条(7.2%)达到了不同意阈值,48条(69.6%)未达成共识。SC对后一类陈述进行了修订,并为第二轮起草了37条。总体而言,在第二轮中,5条(13.5%)陈述达到了同意阈值,1条(2.7%)达到了不同意阈值,31条(83.8%)未达成共识。
该调查表明,在分子特征、突变、吸烟、类固醇疗法的作用以及免疫疗法再次挑战的必要性方面达成了共识,同时也揭示了意大利肿瘤学家在NSCLC免疫疗法使用方面存在的几个不确定领域。未达成共识的陈述可用于指导未来解决这些问题的临床研究。