Anton Corina-Ioana, Ștefan Ion, Duțulescu Sorin, Stăniceanu Florica, Buzilă Cosmin Alexandru, Ștefan Alexia-Teodora, Streinu-Cercel Adrian
Department of Infectious Diseases, "Dr. Carol Davila" Central Military Emergency University Hospital, 134 Calea Plevnei, 010242 Bucharest, Romania.
Department of Medico-Surgical and Prophylactic Disciplines, Titu Maiorescu University, 040441 Bucharest, Romania.
Life (Basel). 2024 Dec 13;14(12):1658. doi: 10.3390/life14121658.
Histological findings of infective endocarditis (IEs) in mechanical valves present a complex diagnostic challenge owing to the lack of a precise definition. This ambiguity is further complicated by the natural degenerative processes that occur in the mechanical valves over time. Consequently, pathologists and clinicians face significant difficulties in distinguishing between genuine infective processes and the normal wear and tear of mechanical valves.
This retrospective cohort study was conducted between January 2017 and January 2024 and examined tissue samples from 93 patients who underwent a surgical removal of mechanical heart valves, with 41 cases suspected of infective endocarditis and 52 cases of non-IE. The researchers aimed to establish more precise histological criteria for distinguishing between these two conditions, focusing on two key features: vegetations and inflammatory patterns.
IE in patients with prosthetic heart valves presents distinct histological features that aid in the diagnosis and differentiation of non-infective complications. Hallmark characteristics include vegetation and inflammatory infiltrates with neutrophils. Valve tissue specimens from patients whose mechanical valves were removed because of non-infectious complications showed a different histological profile. Inflammatory infiltrates were observed in approximately 26% of these cases; however, they were primarily composed of macrophages and lymphocytes rather than neutrophils.
By emphasizing neutrophil-rich inflammation as a key indicator, clinicians and pathologists could more effectively distinguish between true infective endocarditis and non-IE that can occur in the mechanical valves. This distinction is crucial for appropriate patient management as the treatment strategies for infective and non-infective valve conditions differ significantly.
由于缺乏精确的定义,机械瓣膜感染性心内膜炎(IE)的组织学表现带来了复杂的诊断挑战。随着时间的推移,机械瓣膜中自然发生的退行性变过程使这种模糊性更加复杂。因此,病理学家和临床医生在区分真正的感染过程和机械瓣膜的正常磨损方面面临重大困难。
这项回顾性队列研究于2017年1月至2024年1月进行,研究对象为93例行机械心脏瓣膜手术切除的患者的组织样本,其中41例怀疑感染性心内膜炎,52例为非IE。研究人员旨在建立更精确的组织学标准以区分这两种情况,重点关注两个关键特征:赘生物和炎症模式。
人工心脏瓣膜患者的IE呈现出独特的组织学特征,有助于诊断和区分非感染性并发症。标志性特征包括赘生物和中性粒细胞炎症浸润。因非感染性并发症而切除机械瓣膜的患者的瓣膜组织标本显示出不同的组织学特征。在这些病例中,约26%观察到炎症浸润;然而,它们主要由巨噬细胞和淋巴细胞而非中性粒细胞组成。
通过强调以富含中性粒细胞的炎症作为关键指标,临床医生和病理学家可以更有效地区分真正的感染性心内膜炎和机械瓣膜可能出现的非IE。这种区分对于适当的患者管理至关重要,因为感染性和非感染性瓣膜疾病的治疗策略有显著差异。