Saladini Francesca, Baggio Stefania, Marcato Federica, Campisi Francesco, Verlato Roberto, Pasquetto Giampaolo, Bertaglia Emanuele, Povolo Gaetano, Buja Paolo, Ferri Nicola
Cardiology Unit, Cittadella Town Hospital, 35013 Cittadella, Italy.
Pharmacology Unit, Camposampiero Town Hospital, 35012 Camposampiero, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 10;13(24):7505. doi: 10.3390/jcm13247505.
Treatment of CV risk factors, such as cholesterol level, represents one of the main goals to reduce atherosclerotic burden. The aim of this study was to investigate the prescriptive appropriateness of cholesterol-lowering drugs among patients who experienced an atherosclerotic CV disease (ASCVD). : We investigated 155 patients who underwent cardiac rehabilitation in 2020. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 2021 guidelines on CV disease prevention and 2019 ESC Guidelines on dyslipidemias were followed to detect the appropriateness of prescription. SCORE2 and SCORE2-OP risk estimations were used to detect patients' CV risk profiles. Patients were divided into three groups: 1 (n = 118) patients admitted for their first CV event, 2A (n = 18) patients who experienced a previous CV event years before, and 2B (n = 19) patients admitted for a new event with a previous CV event 2 years before. Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level was detected at the time of admission to the hospital, during cardiac rehabilitation, and at the first visit after rehabilitation. The statistics for our study participants, with a mean age of 66.1 years, were: 72.4% overweight/obese, 63.9% diabetic, 72.5% smokers, 93.0% hypertensives, and 91.7% had dyslipidemias. In group 1, only 5.1% had a low/moderate risk, 44.1% presented a high risk, and 50.8% a very high risk according to calculators. The average LDL levels were 115.8 mg/dL (2.99 mol/L) upon admission to the hospital, 66.4 mg/dL (1.72 mmol/L) at the time of cardiac rehabilitation, and 64.8 mg/dL (1.67 mmol/L) at the subsequent medical visit. In the overall group, only 36.0% had LDL < 55 mg/dL (1.42 mmol/L). In group 1, 79.4% were treated with high-intensity statin alone or plus ezetimibe; in group 2A, the percentage increased up to 87.5%, while group 2B 33.4% was treated with high-intensity statin plus ezetimibe and 33.3% were treated with PCSK9 inhibitors. : This retrospective study confirms the importance of properly calculating CV risk profiles. The main limitations for the efficacy of lipid-lowering drugs were: patient's compliance, drugs side effects, lifestyle habits, and collaboration with a general practitioner.
治疗心血管危险因素,如胆固醇水平,是减轻动脉粥样硬化负担的主要目标之一。本研究的目的是调查在患有动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)的患者中降胆固醇药物的处方合理性。我们调查了2020年接受心脏康复治疗的155名患者。遵循欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)2021年心血管疾病预防指南和2019年ESC血脂异常指南来检测处方的合理性。使用SCORE2和SCORE2-OP风险评估来检测患者的心血管风险状况。患者分为三组:1组(n = 118)为首次发生心血管事件而入院的患者,2A组(n = 18)为多年前曾发生过心血管事件的患者,2B组(n = 19)为2年前曾发生过心血管事件且此次因新的事件入院的患者。在入院时、心脏康复期间以及康复后的首次就诊时检测低密度脂蛋白(LDL)胆固醇水平。我们研究参与者的统计数据如下,平均年龄为66.1岁:72.4%超重/肥胖,63.9%患有糖尿病,72.5%吸烟,93.0%患有高血压,91.7%患有血脂异常。在1组中,根据计算器计算,只有5.1%的患者为低/中度风险,44.1%为高风险,50.8%为极高风险。入院时LDL平均水平为115.8 mg/dL(2.99 mmol/L),心脏康复时为66.4 mg/dL(1.72 mmol/L),后续就诊时为64.8 mg/dL(1.67 mmol/L)。在总体组中,只有36.0%的患者LDL < 55 mg/dL(1.42 mmol/L)。在1组中,79.4%的患者仅接受高强度他汀类药物治疗或联合依折麦布治疗;在2A组中,这一比例增至87.5%,而在2B组中,33.4%的患者接受高强度他汀类药物联合依折麦布治疗,33.3%的患者接受前蛋白转化酶枯草溶菌素9(PCSK9)抑制剂治疗。这项回顾性研究证实了正确计算心血管风险状况的重要性。降脂药物疗效的主要限制因素包括:患者的依从性、药物副作用、生活方式习惯以及与全科医生的协作。