Marcon Julian, Bischoff Robert, Rattenhuber Kaspar, Chaloupka Michael, Askari Darjusch, Jokisch Jan-Friedrich, Becker Armin J, Pfitzinger Paulo L, Keller Patrick, Berg Elena, Stief Christian G, Siegl Daniel, Kowalski Christian, Buchner Alexander, Pyrgidis Nikolaos, Weinhold Philipp
Department of Urology, University Hospital of the LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital of the LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 10;13(24):7506. doi: 10.3390/jcm13247506.
Higher intraoperative opioid doses may be associated with worse long-term oncological outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer. We aimed to evaluate the impact of higher doses of intraoperative opioids and type of anesthesia on biochemical recurrence (BCR) and mortality after RP in a high-volume tertiary center. All patients underwent RP at our center between 2015 and 2021. The role of major intraoperative opioid agents, such as sufentanil remifentanil, and morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs), as well as the type of anesthesia [total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA), versus a combination of TIVA and epidural anesthesia, versus solely epidural anesthesia], was assessed in predicting BCR and survival after RP. A total of 1137 patients who had a median age of 66 years (interquartile range: 61-72) were included. Overall, 1062 (93%) patients received TIVA, 37 (3%) received TIVA and epidural anesthesia, and 41 (4%) only epidural anesthesia. At a median follow-up of 431 days (interquartile range: 381-639) from RP, 257 (24%) patients developed a BCR. Accordingly, at a median follow-up of 500 days (interquartile range: 450-750), 33 (2.9%) patients died. The type of anesthesia, as well as the dosage or type of the selected intraoperative opioid agents, did not affect either BCR or long-term overall survival. These findings suggest that intraoperative opioid application during RP has no negative oncological impact in the short and long term in patients with localized prostate cancer. Accordingly, combined TIVA and epidural anesthesia, as well as solely epidural anesthesia were associated with similar short- and long-term outcomes compared to TIVA.
前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术(RP)后,术中较高剂量的阿片类药物可能与较差的长期肿瘤学结局相关。我们旨在评估在一家大型三级中心,较高剂量的术中阿片类药物和麻醉类型对RP后生化复发(BCR)和死亡率的影响。2015年至2021年期间,所有患者均在我们中心接受了RP。评估了主要术中阿片类药物(如舒芬太尼、瑞芬太尼)、吗啡毫克当量(MME)以及麻醉类型[全静脉麻醉(TIVA)、TIVA与硬膜外麻醉联合、单纯硬膜外麻醉]在预测RP后BCR和生存率方面的作用。共纳入1137例患者,中位年龄为66岁(四分位间距:61 - 72岁)。总体而言,1062例(93%)患者接受了TIVA,37例(3%)接受了TIVA与硬膜外麻醉联合,41例(4%)仅接受硬膜外麻醉。RP术后中位随访431天(四分位间距:381 - 639天)时,257例(24%)患者出现BCR。相应地,在中位随访500天(四分位间距:450 - 750天)时,33例(2.9%)患者死亡。麻醉类型以及所选术中阿片类药物的剂量或类型均未影响BCR或长期总生存率。这些发现表明,RP术中应用阿片类药物对局限性前列腺癌患者的短期和长期肿瘤学均无负面影响。因此,与TIVA相比,TIVA与硬膜外麻醉联合以及单纯硬膜外麻醉的短期和长期结局相似。