Rues Stefan, Becker Theresa, Bartha Valentin, Spindler Marcia, Hetzler Sebastian, Wolff Diana, Rammelsberg Peter, Zenthöfer Andreas
Department of Prosthodontics, Medical Faculty, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Department of Conservative Dentistry, Medical Faculty, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 19;13(24):7763. doi: 10.3390/jcm13247763.
Cleaning splints (CSs) can facilitate interdental brush (IDB) insertion and guide IDBs during cleaning movement. Cleaning efficacy with and without CSs was to be assessed and compared for a fully dentate (FD) and a partially edentulous (PE) situation. For two maxillary typodont models simulating either an FD situation or a PE situation with every second tooth missing, suitable IDBs were selected and each cleaning splint was designed and fabricated by 3D-printing. Before and after standardized cleaning, model teeth were photographed at three timepoints: (T1) clean surface, (T2) surface coated with artificial plaque, and (T3) after IDB cleaning. For each of the four test groups differing in dental status (FD, PE) and CS use (without, with), n = 10 tests/group were completed. After aligning corresponding photographs, pixel-based color difference ratios (T2-T3)/(T2-T1) were calculated. Approximal cleaning efficacy was set as the mean value over predefined regions of interest. Effects of CS use and dental status were analyzed with two-way ANOVA (α = 0.05). CS use significantly improved mean approximal cleaning efficacy for the PE model ( = 0.001), whereas no difference was found with the FD model ( = 0.381). Improved cleaning efficacy with the PE model was only found in combination with a CS (factor combination model × CS use: = 0.003). Cleaning splints might have the potential to improve interproximal hygiene and can be recommended for clinical use. Clinical studies should validate the results of this in vitro study and clarify if CSs could be beneficial for patients with restricted manual skills.
清洁夹板(CSs)可便于牙间隙刷(IDB)插入,并在清洁过程中引导牙间隙刷。本研究旨在评估和比较在全口牙列完整(FD)和部分牙列缺失(PE)情况下,使用和不使用CSs时的清洁效果。对于两个模拟FD情况或每隔一颗牙缺失的PE情况的上颌牙模型,选择合适的IDB,并通过3D打印设计和制作每个清洁夹板。在标准化清洁前后,在三个时间点对模型牙齿进行拍照:(T1)清洁表面,(T2)涂有人造菌斑的表面,以及(T3)IDB清洁后。对于四个在牙齿状况(FD、PE)和CS使用情况(不使用、使用)上不同的测试组,每组完成n = 10次测试。对齐相应照片后,计算基于像素的色差比率(T2-T3)/(T2-T1)。将邻面清洁效果设定为预定义感兴趣区域的平均值。使用双向方差分析(α = 0.05)分析CS使用情况和牙齿状况的影响。使用CSs显著提高了PE模型的平均邻面清洁效果(P = 0.001),而FD模型未发现差异(P = 0.381)。仅在与CS结合使用时,PE模型的清洁效果有所改善(因素组合:模型×CS使用情况:P = 0.003)。清洁夹板可能具有改善邻面卫生的潜力,可推荐用于临床。临床研究应验证本体外研究的结果,并阐明CSs是否对手动技能受限的患者有益。