Suppr超能文献

胸骨旁肋间阻滞辅助在采用胸神经阻滞I和锯肌-肋间阻滞的改良根治性乳房切除术中有助于术后疼痛缓解:一项随机试验

Parasternal Intercostal Block Complementation Contributes to Postoperative Pain Relief in Modified Radical Mastectomy Employing Pectoral Nerve Block I and Serratus-Intercostal Block: A Randomized Trial.

作者信息

Song Wen-Qin, Wang Wei, Yang Ying-Cong, Sun Qian, Chen Hui, Zhang Lei, Bu Xue-Shan, Zhan Li-Ying, Xia Zhong-Yuan

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Pain Res. 2020 Apr 30;13:865-871. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S237435. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Pectoral nerve block I (PECS I) and serratus-intercostal plane block (SIPB) can anesthetize the majority mammary region, while parasternal intercostal block (PSI) targets the internal area during breast resection surgery. The aim of this study was to determine whether including PSI with PECS I and SIPB is more effective compared to PECS I and SIPB alone.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-two adult females undergoing unilateral modified radical mastectomy (MRM) were randomly assigned to receive either PECS I and SIPB (PS group, n=31) or a combination of PECS I, SIPB, and PSI (PSP group, n=31). The outcomes were measured with a numerical rating scale (NRS) score, and in terms of opioid consumption and anesthesia-related complications within 48 h after surgery.

RESULTS

Although there were no differences in the NRS scores between the two groups during the inactive periods, the combination of three nerve blocks significantly reduced the NRS scores during movement. In addition, morphine equivalent consumption was lower in the PSP group compared to the PS group. Postoperative adverse events were similar in both groups in terms of regional anesthesia-related complications.

CONCLUSION

The combination of PECS I block, SIPB, and PSI block provides superior pain relief and postoperative recovery for patients undergoing MRM.

摘要

目的

胸肌神经阻滞I(PECS I)和前锯肌-肋间平面阻滞(SIPB)可麻醉大部分乳腺区域,而胸骨旁肋间阻滞(PSI)在乳腺切除手术中针对内部区域。本研究的目的是确定与单独的PECS I和SIPB相比,将PSI与PECS I和SIPB联合使用是否更有效。

患者与方法

62例行单侧改良根治性乳房切除术(MRM)的成年女性被随机分配接受PECS I和SIPB(PS组,n = 31)或PECS I、SIPB和PSI联合治疗(PSP组,n = 31)。采用数字评分量表(NRS)评分以及术后48小时内的阿片类药物消耗量和麻醉相关并发症来衡量结果。

结果

尽管在非活动期两组的NRS评分没有差异,但三种神经阻滞联合使用在活动期间显著降低了NRS评分。此外,PSP组的吗啡当量消耗量低于PS组。两组在区域麻醉相关并发症方面的术后不良事件相似。

结论

PECS I阻滞、SIPB和PSI阻滞联合使用为接受MRM的患者提供了更好的疼痛缓解和术后恢复效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e522/7201222/1c6624fc04f0/JPR-13-865-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验