Brett E A, Ostroff R
Am J Psychiatry. 1985 Apr;142(4):417-24. doi: 10.1176/ajp.142.4.417.
A review of theories of traumatic neurosis or posttraumatic stress disorder reveals a relative neglect of the role of posttraumatic imagery. The broad range of imagery has not been recognized, nor its role in the disorder adequately formulated. A two-dimensional framework for understanding posttraumatic stress disorder based on 1) repetitions of trauma-related images, affects, somatic states, and actions and 2) defensive functioning puts into perspective the centrality of traumatic imagery, implies a reorganization of DSM-III criteria, points to new directions for research, and clarifies diagnostic and clinical confusion.
对创伤性神经症或创伤后应激障碍理论的回顾显示,创伤后意象的作用相对被忽视了。意象的广泛范围尚未得到认可,其在该障碍中的作用也未得到充分阐述。一个基于以下两点来理解创伤后应激障碍的二维框架:1)与创伤相关的意象、情感、躯体状态及行为的重复;2)防御功能,这使创伤性意象的核心地位得以凸显,意味着对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM-III)标准的重新组织,为研究指明了新方向,并澄清了诊断和临床方面的困惑。