Rus Florentina, Neculau Cristina, Imre Marina, Duica Florentina, Popa Alexandra, Moisa Radu Mihai, Voicu-Balasea Bianca, Radulescu Radu, Ripszky Alexandra, Ene Razvan, Pituru Silviu
Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 8 Eroilor Sanitari Blvd, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Faculty of Dental Medicine, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 17-23 Calea Plevnei, 010221 Bucharest, Romania.
Polymers (Basel). 2024 Dec 19;16(24):3550. doi: 10.3390/polym16243550.
In the latter part of the 20th century, remarkable developments in new dental materials and technologies were achieved. However, regarding the impact of dental resin-based materials 3D-printed on cellular responses, there have been a limited number of published studies recently. The biocompatibility of dental restorative materials is a controversial topic, especially when discussing modern manufacturing technologies. Three-dimensional printing generates the release of residual monomers due to incomplete polymerization of materials and involves the use of potentially toxic substances in post-printing processes that cannot be completely eliminated. Considering the issue of biocompatibility, this article aims to establish an overview of this aspect, summarizing the different types of biocompatibility tests performed on materials used in 3D printing in dentistry. In order to create this comprehensive review, articles dealing with the issue of 3D printing in dentistry were analysed by accessing the main specialized search engines using specific keywords. Relevant data referring to types of materials used in 3DP to manufacture various dental devices, polymerization methods, factors affecting monomer release, cytotoxicity of unreacted products or post-curing treatments, and methods for assessing biocompatibility were analysed. Although the introduction of new restorative materials used in dental treatments is subject to national and international regulations and standards, it is necessary to investigate them regarding biocompatibility in order to support or deny the manufacturers' statements regarding this aspect.
在20世纪后半叶,新型牙科材料和技术取得了显著进展。然而,关于3D打印的牙科树脂基材料对细胞反应的影响,最近发表的研究数量有限。牙科修复材料的生物相容性是一个有争议的话题,尤其是在讨论现代制造技术时。三维打印由于材料聚合不完全会产生残留单体的释放,并且在打印后处理过程中涉及使用无法完全消除的潜在有毒物质。考虑到生物相容性问题,本文旨在对这方面进行概述,总结对牙科3D打印中使用的材料进行的不同类型的生物相容性测试。为了撰写这篇全面的综述,通过使用特定关键词访问主要的专业搜索引擎,对涉及牙科3D打印问题的文章进行了分析。分析了与用于3D打印制造各种牙科器械的材料类型、聚合方法、影响单体释放的因素、未反应产物的细胞毒性或后固化处理以及评估生物相容性的方法相关的数据。尽管牙科治疗中使用的新型修复材料的引入受到国家和国际法规及标准的约束,但有必要对其生物相容性进行研究,以支持或反驳制造商在这方面的声明。