Balcom Erin F, Mccombe Jennifer A, Kate Mahesh P, Vu Khanh, Martins Karen J B, Aponte-Hao Sylvia, Richer Lawrence, Williamson Tyler, Klarenbach Scott W, Smyth Penelope S
Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Real World Evidence Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Neurology. 2025 Feb 11;104(3):e210251. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000210251. Epub 2025 Jan 7.
To compare disease-modifying therapy (DMT) use between people living with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) who resided in rural vs urban areas.
This retrospective cohort study used population-level individually linked administrative data to identify pwMS on April 1, 2019 (index date), in Alberta, Canada. DMT use was compared between pwMS who resided in rural vs urban areas during a 1-year postindex period. Structural equation modelling (SEM) and logistic regression (with 95% confidence intervals) were applied.
PwMS (n = 4,593) who resided in rural areas (vs urban) were 17% less likely to have received a DMT (odds ratio: 0.83 [0.69-0.99]; SEM total β: -0.032, < 0.05), of which 39% of this disparity was explained by a lower socioeconomic status (SEM indirect β: -0.012 [ < 0.001]/total β: -0.032); 26% were less likely to have received an induction/higher efficacy therapy (odds ratio: 0.74 [0.57-0.95]), of which <1% of this disparity was explained by socioeconomic status (SEM indirect β: -0.0001 [ < 0.01]/total β: -0.040).
PwMS residing in rural (vs urban) Alberta are less likely to receive any DMT, especially induction/higher-efficacy therapy; this inequality may be mediated by socioeconomic status and geography. Identifying and overcoming barriers to optimal clinical care in this patient population is needed.
比较居住在农村和城市的多发性硬化症患者(pwMS)之间疾病修饰治疗(DMT)的使用情况。
这项回顾性队列研究使用了人口水平的个人关联行政数据,以识别2019年4月1日(索引日期)在加拿大艾伯塔省的pwMS。在索引日期后的1年期间,比较了居住在农村和城市的pwMS之间DMT的使用情况。应用了结构方程模型(SEM)和逻辑回归(95%置信区间)。
居住在农村地区(与城市地区相比)的pwMS(n = 4,593)接受DMT的可能性低17%(优势比:0.83 [0.69 - 0.99];SEM总β:-0.032,<0.05),其中39%的这种差异可归因于较低的社会经济地位(SEM间接β:-0.012 [<0.001]/总β:-0.032);接受诱导/高疗效治疗的可能性低26%(优势比:0.74 [0.57 - 0.95]),其中<1%的这种差异可归因于社会经济地位(SEM间接β:-0.0001 [<0.01]/总β:-0.040)。
居住在艾伯塔省农村(与城市相比)的pwMS接受任何DMT的可能性较小,尤其是诱导/高疗效治疗;这种不平等可能由社会经济地位和地理位置介导。需要识别并克服该患者群体获得最佳临床护理的障碍。