• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头颈癌患者的农村地区情况、医疗保健资源利用及护理轨迹

Rurality, Health Care Resource Use, and Care Trajectories in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.

作者信息

Thomas Abigail, Dort Joseph Clyde, Nakoneshny Steven C, Matthews Thomas Wayne, Chandarana Shamir, Hart Robert, Sauro Khara M

机构信息

Department of Community Health Sciences and O'Brien Institute of Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Department of Oncology, Arnie Charbonneau Cancer Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, Univerity of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e254675. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.4675.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.4675
PMID:40227686
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11997726/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Head and neck cancer (HNC) epidemiology varies geographically, and rural populations (typically less affluent) may face barriers accessing cancer care, which could lead to worse outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To compare health care resource use between patients with HNC living in urban and rural areas.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective cohort study in Alberta, Canada. Participants were adult patients (aged ≥18 years) diagnosed with HNC with at least 1 year of posttreatment follow-up between January 2012 and September 2020. Data were analyzed from August to September 2024.

EXPOSURE

Rural location of residence at HNC diagnosis, defined using the forward sortation area of the patients' postal code.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcomes were health care resource use and patient care trajectories, including hospital length of stay, 30-day hospital readmissions, emergency department visits, time from diagnosis to first treatment, first type of practitioner seen after hospital discharge, and most common practitioner-to-practitioner transitions.

RESULTS

The cohort included 2189 patients with a median (IQR) age of 63 (55-71) years, who were mostly men (1557 patients [71.1%]) with stage IV cancer (1149 patients [52.5%]) of the tongue (640 patients [29.2%]), of which 375 (17.1%) lived in a rural area. There was no difference in cumulative hospital length of stay between urban and rural patients; however, male patients living in rural areas had a longer surgical hospital length of stay than male patients living in urban areas (incidence rate ratio, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.03-1.50). Patients living in rural areas had more 30-day hospital readmissions (63 patients [16.8%] vs 183 patients [10.1%]) and emergency department visits (median [IQR], 8 [3-17] vs 4 [2-9]) than their urban counterparts. Time to first treatment was longer in patients living in rural areas compared with patients living in urban areas (median [IQR], 64 [46-95] days vs 57 [40-84] days). Patients living in rural areas without comorbid conditions had greater odds of being discharged directly to the care of a general practitioner after a hospital stay than urban patients (odds ratio, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.23-3.15).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort study of patients with HNC, living in rural areas was associated with higher health care resource use than patients living in urban areas. Recommendations specific to patients with HNC living in rural areas may be warranted given these differences.

摘要

重要性

头颈癌(HNC)的流行病学在地理上存在差异,农村人口(通常较不富裕)在获得癌症治疗方面可能面临障碍,这可能导致更差的治疗结果。

目的

比较城市和农村地区HNC患者的医疗资源使用情况。

设计、设置和参与者:加拿大艾伯塔省的回顾性队列研究。参与者为2012年1月至2020年9月期间被诊断为HNC且至少有1年治疗后随访的成年患者(年龄≥18岁)。数据于2024年8月至9月进行分析。

暴露因素

HNC诊断时的农村居住地点,根据患者邮政编码的前向分拣区定义。

主要结局和测量指标

主要结局为医疗资源使用情况和患者护理轨迹,包括住院时间、30天内再次住院、急诊就诊、从诊断到首次治疗的时间、出院后首次就诊的医生类型以及最常见的医生间转诊情况。

结果

该队列包括2189名患者,中位(IQR)年龄为63(55 - 71)岁,大多数为男性(1557名患者[71.1%]),患有IV期癌症(1149名患者[52.5%]),主要为舌癌(640名患者[29.2%]),其中375名(17.1%)居住在农村地区。城市和农村患者的累计住院时间没有差异;然而,居住在农村地区的男性患者手术住院时间比居住在城市地区的男性患者更长(发病率比,1.24;95%CI,1.03 - 1.50)。与城市患者相比,居住在农村地区的患者30天内再次住院的情况更多(63名患者[16.8%]对183名患者[10.1%]),急诊就诊次数也更多(中位[IQR],8[3 - 17]次对4[2 - 9]次)。与居住在城市地区的患者相比,居住在农村地区患者的首次治疗时间更长(中位[IQR],64[46 - 95]天对57[40 - 84]天)。与城市患者相比,没有合并症的农村地区患者在住院后直接由全科医生护理的几率更高(优势比,1.97;95%CI,1.23 - 3.15)。

结论和相关性

在这项针对HNC患者的队列研究中,居住在农村地区的患者比居住在城市地区的患者医疗资源使用更高。鉴于这些差异,可能需要针对居住在农村地区的HNC患者制定具体建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7602/11997726/aa9cb5af0b70/jamanetwopen-e254675-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7602/11997726/f6eaaa90a4bc/jamanetwopen-e254675-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7602/11997726/aa9cb5af0b70/jamanetwopen-e254675-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7602/11997726/f6eaaa90a4bc/jamanetwopen-e254675-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7602/11997726/aa9cb5af0b70/jamanetwopen-e254675-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Rurality, Health Care Resource Use, and Care Trajectories in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.头颈癌患者的农村地区情况、医疗保健资源利用及护理轨迹
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e254675. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.4675.
2
Is a Rapid Recovery Protocol for THA and TKA Associated With Decreased 90-day Complications, Opioid Use, and Readmissions in a Health Safety-net Hospital?THA 和 TKA 的快速康复方案是否与降低卫生保障医院 90 天内并发症、阿片类药物使用和再入院率有关?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Aug 1;482(8):1442-1451. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003054. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
3
Elective THA for Indications Other Than Osteoarthritis Is Associated With Increased Cost and Resource Use: A Medicare Database Study of 135,194 Claims.择期全髋关节置换术用于治疗非骨关节炎的适应证与更高的成本和资源利用相关:一项基于 Medicare 数据库的 135194 例患者的研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jul 1;482(7):1159-1170. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002922. Epub 2023 Nov 24.
4
Rural and Urban Differences in Prostate Cancer Recurrence.前列腺癌复发的城乡差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2526912. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.26912.
5
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
6
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
8
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
9
Contralateral THAs More Than 1 Year Apart: Do PROMs and Healthcare Utilization Differ After Each Procedure?间隔超过1年的对侧全髋关节置换术:每次手术后患者报告结局测量指标(PROMs)和医疗资源利用情况是否存在差异?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 May 1;483(5):832-842. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003339. Epub 2024 Dec 6.
10
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.

本文引用的文献

1
The health care experiences of people with head and neck cancer: A scoping review.头颈癌患者的医疗保健经历:一项范围综述。
Head Neck. 2024 Jan;46(1):74-85. doi: 10.1002/hed.27558. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
2
Exploring the impact of remoteness on people with head and neck cancer: Utilisation of a state-wide dataset.探讨偏远地区对头颈部癌症患者的影响:全州范围数据集的利用。
Aust J Rural Health. 2023 Aug;31(4):726-743. doi: 10.1111/ajr.13005. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
3
Virtual Care Adoption-Challenges and Opportunities From the Lens of Academic Primary Care Practitioners.
虚拟医疗保健的采用——学术基层医疗从业者视角下的挑战与机遇。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2022;28(6):599-602. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001548. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
4
A Primary Care Telehealth Pilot Program to Improve Access: Associations with Patients' Health Care Utilization and Costs.一项旨在改善医疗可及性的基层医疗远程医疗试点项目:与患者医疗保健利用及成本的关联
Telemed J E Health. 2022 May;28(5):643-653. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2021.0284. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
5
Effect of socioeconomic status on survival in patients with head and neck cancer.社会经济地位对头颈部癌症患者生存的影响。
Head Neck. 2021 Oct;43(10):3001-3009. doi: 10.1002/hed.26788. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
6
Socioeconomic Status and Rurality Among Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.社会经济地位和农村居民在头颈部癌症患者中的差异。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Jun;166(6):1028-1037. doi: 10.1177/01945998211019278. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
7
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.头颈部鳞状细胞癌
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2020 Nov 26;6(1):92. doi: 10.1038/s41572-020-00224-3.
8
The pesticides use and the risk for head and neck cancer: A review of case-control studies.农药使用与头颈部癌症风险:病例对照研究综述。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2021 Jan 1;26(1):e56-e63. doi: 10.4317/medoral.23962.
9
Continuity of Care, Follow-Up Care, and Outcomes among Breast Cancer Survivors.乳腺癌幸存者的连续护理、随访护理和结局。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 22;16(17):3050. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16173050.
10
Secondary EMR data for quality improvement and research: A comparison of manual and electronic data collection from an integrated critical care electronic medical record system.用于质量改进和研究的次要电子病历数据:从集成的重症监护电子病历系统中手动和电子数据采集的比较。
J Crit Care. 2018 Oct;47:295-301. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.07.021. Epub 2018 Jul 22.