Kebede Balcha Negese, Seid Seid Mohammed, Samuel Eyerus Gesesse
Hawassa University College of Medicine and Health Sciences Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Hawassa City, Ethiopia.
BMC Ophthalmol. 2025 Jan 7;25(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03817-8.
Contrast sensitivity is an important measure of vision quality. Risk of falling injury is strongly associated with poor contrast sensitivity compared with poor near- and distance visual acuity. Since good visual acuity is not necessarily associated with good visual performance in the "real world" it is important to consider contrast sensitivity when prescribing corrective lenses. There is limited evidence on how refractive error and its correction affect contrast sensitivity in the study area. Therefore, this study is important to understand how refractive correction affects contrast sensitivity, which is important baseline information for prescribing refractive error correction.
This study aimed to measure the mean difference in contrast sensitivity with and without corrective lenses in patients with refractive error.
Objective and subjective refractions were done for each patient, then Pelli- Robson contrast sensitivity was measured for them using computer based Pelli-Robson chart at 1 m. Pelli- Robson contrast sensitivity value (Log CS) with and without corrective lenses were recorded for each study participant. The collected data were checked for completeness and analyzed using SPSS 26. Descriptive analyses, independent sample t-tests, and one-way ANOVA were performed to compare CS means; the findings are presented using tables and pie charts. A P-value of ≤ 0.05 was used to indicate statistical significance.
One hundred sixty-two patients attending refraction clinics participated in this study with response rate 98.19% of which 51.9% were male. The mean age of the participants was 34.28 ± 12.79 (SD). The mean contrast sensitivity increased from 1.29 ± 0.35 (SD) to1.51 ± 0.28 (SD) LogCS units with refractive correction (p = 0.000). There is no significant difference in contrast sensitivity between the types of refractive errors.
Uncorrected refractive can affect contrast sensitivity; therefore, proper refractive correction is essential to improve visual acuity and contrast sensitivity.
对比敏感度是视觉质量的一项重要指标。与近视力和远视力不佳相比,跌倒受伤风险与对比敏感度差密切相关。由于在“现实世界”中良好的视力不一定与良好的视觉表现相关联,因此在开具矫正眼镜处方时考虑对比敏感度很重要。关于屈光不正及其矫正如何影响研究区域内的对比敏感度,证据有限。因此,本研究对于了解屈光矫正如何影响对比敏感度很重要,这是开具屈光不正矫正处方的重要基线信息。
本研究旨在测量屈光不正患者佩戴和不佩戴矫正眼镜时对比敏感度的平均差异。
对每位患者进行客观和主观验光,然后使用基于计算机的佩利-罗布森图表在1米处测量他们的佩利-罗布森对比敏感度。记录每位研究参与者佩戴和不佩戴矫正眼镜时的佩利-罗布森对比敏感度值(Log CS)。检查收集的数据是否完整,并使用SPSS 26进行分析。进行描述性分析、独立样本t检验和单因素方差分析以比较对比敏感度均值;研究结果以表格和饼图形式呈现。P值≤0.05表示具有统计学意义。
162名到验光诊所就诊的患者参与了本研究,应答率为98.19%,其中51.9%为男性。参与者的平均年龄为34.28±12.79(标准差)。屈光矫正后,平均对比敏感度从1.29±0.35(标准差)LogCS单位增加到1.51±0.28(标准差)LogCS单位(p = 0.000)。不同类型的屈光不正之间对比敏感度无显著差异。
未矫正的屈光不正会影响对比敏感度;因此,适当的屈光矫正对于提高视力和对比敏感度至关重要。