Suppr超能文献

非洲地区多中心HIV随机对照试验分析中的统计方法:一项范围综述

Statistical methods in the analysis of multicentre HIV randomized controlled trials in the African region: a scoping review.

作者信息

Mazinu Mikateko, Gwebushe Nomonde, Manda Samuel, Reddy Tarylee

机构信息

Biostatistics Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, P.O Box 19070, Tygerberg, Cape Town, 7505, South Africa.

School of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, 3201, South Africa.

出版信息

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Jan 8;25(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02441-w.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The majority of phase 3 clinical trials are implemented in multiple sites or centres, which inevitably leads to a correlation between observations from the same site or centre. This correlation must be carefully considered in both the design and the statistical analysis to ensure an accurate interpretation of the results and reduce the risk of biased results. This scoping review aims to provide a detailed statistical method used to analyze data collected from multicentre HIV randomized controlled trials in the African region.

METHODS

This review followed the methodological framework proposed by Arksey and O'Malley. We searched four databases (PubMed, EBSCOhost, Scopus, and Web of Science) and retrieved 977 articles, 34 of which were included in the review.

RESULTS

Data charting revealed that the most used statistical methods for analysing HIV endpoints in multicentre randomized controlled trials in Africa were standard survival analysis techniques (24 articles [71%]). Approximately 47% of the articles used stratified analysis methods to account for variations across different sites. Out of 34 articles reviewed, only 6 explicitly considered intra-site correlation in the analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our scoping review provides insights into the statistical methods used to analyse HIV data in multicentre randomized controlled trials in Africa and highlights the need for standardized reporting of statistical methods.

摘要

背景

大多数3期临床试验是在多个地点或中心开展的,这不可避免地导致来自同一地点或中心的观察结果之间存在相关性。在设计和统计分析中都必须仔细考虑这种相关性,以确保对结果进行准确解读,并降低结果出现偏差的风险。本综述旨在提供一种详细的统计方法,用于分析从非洲地区多中心HIV随机对照试验收集的数据。

方法

本综述遵循了阿克西和奥马利提出的方法框架。我们检索了四个数据库(PubMed、EBSCOhost、Scopus和Web of Science),共检索到977篇文章,其中34篇被纳入本综述。

结果

数据梳理显示,非洲多中心随机对照试验中分析HIV终点最常用的统计方法是标准生存分析技术(24篇文章[71%])。约47%的文章使用分层分析方法来解释不同地点之间的差异。在34篇综述文章中,只有6篇在分析中明确考虑了地点内相关性。

结论

我们的综述提供了对非洲多中心随机对照试验中用于分析HIV数据的统计方法的见解,并强调了统计方法标准化报告的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e895/11707912/3f5b941885d2/12874_2024_2441_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验