Kristensen Mads Aage Toft, Risør Mette Bech, Heltberg Andreas Søndergaard, Willadsen Tora Grauers, Guassora Ann Dorrit
Centre for General Practice, The Research Unit for General Practice in Copenhagen, Slagelse and Køge and Section for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Centre for General Practice, The Research Unit for General Practice in Copenhagen, Slagelse and Køge and Section for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
BJGP Open. 2025 Jul 23;9(2). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0146. Print 2025.
In chronic care, patient-GP collaboration is essential, but might be challenging if patients have complex health problems because of multimorbidity, psychosocial predicaments, and addiction problems. To understand and manage these challenges, it is important to explore how patients and GPs attempt to collaborate, to maintain and achieve an alliance in order to gain good quality of care.
To explore how dyads of GPs and patients, who GPs deem have complex health problems and difficulties following treatment, perceive and manage challenges in their chronic care partnership.
DESIGN & SETTING: This was a qualitative study from Danish general practice in deprived, rural areas.
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 dyads of GPs and patients with doctor-assessed complex chronic conditions and difficulties following treatment. The principles of systematic text condensation were used in the analysis.
Overall, the patient-GP collaboration could be characterised as either 'stuck' or 'unstable'. In both types, the challenges were identified as pointless consultations, conflicts about lifestyle, resignation, concealment of information, and hopelessness. These challenges could be managed by solving conflicts, adjusting to the patient's needs, accommodating the challenges in the relationship, and offering continued emotional support even with unsolved medical problems.
Care of patients with complex health problems may present several challenges. In this study, patients and GPs experienced the relational dimension as crucial for collaboration. A robust therapeutic alliance, incorporating the patient's agenda, offers an essential foundation for enhancing care in individuals with complex health problems.
在慢性病护理中,患者与全科医生的合作至关重要,但如果患者因多种疾病、心理社会困境和成瘾问题而存在复杂的健康问题,这种合作可能具有挑战性。为了理解和应对这些挑战,探索患者和全科医生如何尝试合作、维持并达成联盟以获得高质量的护理非常重要。
探讨全科医生认为患有复杂健康问题且治疗后存在困难的患者与全科医生二元组如何看待和应对其慢性病护理伙伴关系中的挑战。
这是一项来自丹麦贫困农村地区全科医疗的定性研究。
对12对患有经医生评估的复杂慢性病且治疗后存在困难的全科医生与患者进行了半结构式访谈。分析采用系统文本浓缩原则。
总体而言,患者与全科医生的合作可被描述为“停滞不前”或“不稳定”。在这两种类型中,挑战都被确定为无意义的会诊、关于生活方式的冲突、听天由命、信息隐瞒和绝望。这些挑战可以通过解决冲突、根据患者需求进行调整、适应关系中的挑战以及即使医疗问题未解决也提供持续的情感支持来应对。
对患有复杂健康问题的患者进行护理可能会带来诸多挑战。在本研究中,患者和全科医生都认为关系层面对于合作至关重要。一个包含患者议程的稳固治疗联盟为改善患有复杂健康问题个体的护理提供了重要基础。