Bratcher Anna, Jones Jefferson M, Meyer William A, Waheed Rehan, Yazgi Huda, Harris Aaron, Gundlapalli Adi V, Clarke Kristie E N
Epidemic Intelligence Service, US Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, US Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 8;20(1):e0313620. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313620. eCollection 2025.
People with immunocompromising conditions (IC) are at increased risk of severe COVID-19 and death. These individuals show weaker immunogenicity following vaccination than individuals without IC, yet immunogenicity after SARS-CoV-2 infection is poorly understood. To address this gap, the presence of infection-induced antibodies in sera following a positive COVID-19 test result was compared between patients with and without IC. A commercial laboratory provided patient data gathered during July 2020-February 2022 on COVID-19 viral test results and antibody assay results, which included infection-induced (anti-N) antibody presence. Participants were categorized into having or not having IC based on if there was an indicative diagnostic code on their health record for a five-year period prior to the study period. Anti-N presence in sera from people with a positive COVID-19 test result was compared by IC status for four post-infection periods: 14-90, 91-180, 181-365, and 365+ days. A longitudinal, logistic regression produced adjusted odds ratios comparing anti-N prevalence among specimens with and without associated IC, adjusted for age, sex, residence in a metro area, and social vulnerability index (SVI) tertile. Data included 17,025 anti-N test results from 14,690 patients, 1,424 (9.7%) of which had at least one IC on record. In an adjusted comparison to patients without IC, patients with any IC were 0.61 times as likely to have infection-induced antibodies (99% CI: 0.40-0.93), during the 14-90 days following infection. Similar patterns were found when comparing people with two specific types of IC to people without any IC: (1) solid malignancies and (2) other intrinsic immune conditions. These findings stress the importance of prevention measures for people with IC, such as additional vaccination doses and consistent mask use before and after a documented infection.
免疫功能低下者(IC)感染新冠病毒后出现重症和死亡的风险更高。与非免疫功能低下者相比,这些人接种疫苗后的免疫原性较弱,但感染新冠病毒后的免疫原性情况尚不清楚。为填补这一空白,研究比较了新冠病毒检测呈阳性的患者中,有无免疫功能低下者感染后血清中感染诱导抗体的存在情况。一家商业实验室提供了2020年7月至2022年2月期间收集的患者数据,包括新冠病毒检测结果和抗体检测结果,其中包括感染诱导(抗N)抗体的存在情况。根据研究期间前五年健康记录中是否有指示性诊断代码,将参与者分为有或无免疫功能低下。比较了新冠病毒检测呈阳性者血清中抗N的存在情况,按免疫功能低下状态分为感染后四个时期:14 - 90天、91 - 180天、181 - 365天和365天以上。进行纵向逻辑回归分析,比较有无相关免疫功能低下的样本中抗N的流行率,并对年龄、性别、居住在都市地区以及社会脆弱性指数(SVI)三分位数进行调整。数据包括来自14690名患者的17025份抗N检测结果,其中1424份(9.7%)有至少一项免疫功能低下记录。在与非免疫功能低下患者的调整比较中,任何免疫功能低下的患者在感染后14 - 90天内产生感染诱导抗体的可能性为非免疫功能低下患者的0.61倍(99%可信区间:0.40 - 0.93)。将两种特定类型免疫功能低下者与无任何免疫功能低下者进行比较时,也发现了类似模式:(1)实体恶性肿瘤和(2)其他内在免疫疾病。这些发现强调了针对免疫功能低下者采取预防措施的重要性,如额外接种疫苗剂量以及在有记录的感染前后持续佩戴口罩。