Headley Tyler Y, Kim Sooyoung, Tozan Yesim
Department of Political Science, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Department of Public Health Policy and Management, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Jan 7;5(1):e0004051. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004051. eCollection 2025.
Research on health systems resilience during the Coronavirus Disease-2019 pandemic frequently used the Global Health Security Index (GHSI), a composite index scoring countries' health security and related capabilities. Conflicting results raised questions regarding the validity of the GHSI as a reliable index. This study attempted to better characterize when and to what extent countries' progress towards Global Health Security (GHS) augments health systems resilience. We used longitudinal data from 191 countries and a difference-in-difference (DiD) causal inference strategy to quantify the effect of countries' GHS capacity as measured by the GHSI on their coverage rates for essential childhood immunizations, a previously established proxy for health systems resilience. Using a sliding scale of cutoff values with step increments of one, we divided countries into treatment and control groups and determined the lowest GHSI score at which a safeguarding effect was observed. All analyses were adjusted for potential confounders. World Bank governance indicators were employed for robustness tests. While countries with overall GHSI scores of 57 and above prevented declines in childhood immunization coverage rates from 2020-2022 (coef: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.41-1.41), this safeguarding effect was strongest in 2021 (coef: 1.23; 95% CI: 0.05-2.41). Coefficient sizes for overall GHSI scores were smaller compared to several GHSI sub-components, including countries' environmental risks (coef: 4.28; 95% CI: 2.56-5.99) and emergency preparedness and response planning (coef: 1.82; 95% CI: 0.54-3.11). Our findings indicate that GHS was positively associated with health systems resilience during the pandemic (2020) and the following two years (2021-2022), that GHS may have had the most significant protective effects in 2021 as compared with 2020 and 2022, and that countries' underlying characteristics, including governance quality, bolstered health systems resilience during the pandemic.
关于2019年冠状病毒病大流行期间卫生系统恢复力的研究经常使用全球卫生安全指数(GHSI),这是一个对各国卫生安全及相关能力进行评分的综合指数。相互矛盾的结果引发了对GHSI作为可靠指数有效性的质疑。本研究试图更好地描述各国在全球卫生安全(GHS)方面取得的进展在何时以及在何种程度上增强了卫生系统的恢复力。我们使用了来自191个国家的纵向数据和差分因果推断策略,以量化用GHSI衡量的各国GHS能力对其儿童基本免疫接种覆盖率的影响,儿童基本免疫接种覆盖率是先前确定的卫生系统恢复力的一个指标。我们使用步长为1的截止值滑动量表,将各国分为处理组和对照组,并确定观察到保护作用的最低GHSI分数。所有分析都对潜在的混杂因素进行了调整。使用世界银行治理指标进行稳健性检验。虽然2020 - 2022年期间GHSI总分在57及以上的国家预防了儿童免疫接种覆盖率的下降(系数:0.91;95%置信区间:0.41 - 1.41),但这种保护作用在2021年最为显著(系数:1.23;95%置信区间:0.05 - 2.41)。与几个GHSI子成分相比,GHSI总分的系数值较小,包括各国的环境风险(系数:4.28;95%置信区间:2.56 - 5.99)以及应急准备和响应计划(系数:1.82;95%置信区间:0.54 - 3.11)。我们的研究结果表明,在大流行期间(2020年)及随后两年(2021 - 2022年),GHS与卫生系统恢复力呈正相关,与2020年和2022年相比,GHS在2021年可能具有最显著的保护作用,并且各国的基本特征,包括治理质量,在大流行期间增强了卫生系统的恢复力。