Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK; ReBUILD for Resilience, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK.
School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Lancet Glob Health. 2023 Sep;11(9):e1454-e1458. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00279-6.
This Viewpoint brings together insights from health system experts working in a range of settings. Our focus is on examining the state of the resilience field, including current thinking on definitions, conceptualisation, critiques, measurement, and capabilities. We highlight the analytical value of resilience, but also its risks, which include neglect of equity and of who is bearing the costs of resilience strategies. Resilience depends crucially on relationships between system actors and components, and-as amply shown during the COVID-19 pandemic-relationships with wider systems (eg, economic, political, and global governance structures). Resilience is therefore connected to power imbalances, which need to be addressed to enact the transformative strategies that are important in dealing with more persistent shocks and stressors, such as climate change. We discourage the framing of resilience as an outcome that can be measured; instead, we see it emerge from systemic resources and interactions, which have effects that can be measured. We propose a more complex categorisation of shocks than the common binary one of acute versus chronic, and outline some of the implications of this for resilience strategies. We encourage a shift in thinking from capacities towards capabilities-what actors could do in future with the necessary transformative strategies, which will need to encompass global, national, and local change. Finally, we highlight lessons emerging in relation to preparing for the next crisis, particularly in clarifying roles and avoiding fragmented governance.
这篇观点文章汇集了在不同环境中工作的卫生系统专家的见解。我们的重点是审视弹性领域的现状,包括对定义、概念化、批评、衡量标准和能力的当前思考。我们强调了弹性的分析价值,但也强调了其风险,其中包括忽视公平以及谁在承受弹性策略的成本。弹性取决于系统参与者和组成部分之间的关系,并且——正如在 COVID-19 大流行期间充分表明的那样——与更广泛的系统(例如经济、政治和全球治理结构)之间的关系。因此,弹性与权力失衡有关,需要解决这些失衡问题,以实施在应对更持久的冲击和压力方面很重要的变革性战略,例如气候变化。我们不鼓励将弹性框架为可以衡量的结果;相反,我们认为它是从系统资源和相互作用中产生的,这些资源和相互作用具有可以衡量的影响。我们提出了一种比常见的急性与慢性二分法更复杂的冲击分类法,并概述了这对弹性策略的一些影响。我们鼓励从能力转向能力的思维转变——这是指在未来需要变革性战略的情况下,参与者可以做些什么,这些战略将需要包含全球、国家和地方的变革。最后,我们强调了与为下一次危机做准备有关的经验教训,特别是在明确角色和避免分散的治理方面。