Banerjee Swapan, Flint Annika, Brosseau Madeleine B, Weedmark Kelly, Shutinoski Bojan
Vibrio Reference Laboratory, Bureau of Microbial Hazards, Health Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Genomics Laboratory, Bureau of Microbial Hazards, Health Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2025 Jan 8;109(1):5. doi: 10.1007/s00253-024-13385-y.
Two methods were compared for their ability to accurately identify Vibrio species of interest: whole genome sequencing as the reference method and MALDI-TOF MS (matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry) proteome fingerprinting. The accuracy of mass spectrometry-based identification method was evaluated for its ability to accurately identify isolates of Vibrio cholerae and Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Identification result of each isolate obtained by mass spectrometry was compared to identification by whole genome sequencing (WGS). The MALDI-TOF MS system had excellent performance for identification of V. cholerae and V. parahaemolyticus isolates grown on a non-selective solid agar media. Unlike the biochemical characterization performed by API20E. In this study, 161 isolates (V. cholerae, n = 33; V. parahaemolyticus, n = 102; V. spp., n = 23; other enteropathogens, Salmonella and E. coli, n = 3) were used to assess accuracy. The MALDI-TOF MS system was able to accurately identify 100% (33/33) of the V. cholerae isolates and 99.9% (101/102) of V. parahaemolyticus isolates, with 100% for both sensitivity and specificity for V. cholerae and 99% sensitivity and 98% specificity for V. parahaemolyticus. Thus, mass spectrometry for bacterial identification is comparable to the WGS. Furthermore, in comparison to a biochemical characterization, the use of MALDI-TOF MS system shortens the analysis time from over 72 h to less than 24 h. KEY POINTS: • V. cholerae and V. parahaemolyticus were successfully ID-ed by MALDI-TOF • MALDI-TOF sensitivity and specificity parallels the WGS method of identification • MALDI-TOF is several days faster than the battery of culture-dependent methods.
将全基因组测序作为参考方法,以及基质辅助激光解吸/电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)蛋白质组指纹图谱法。基于质谱的鉴定方法的准确性通过其准确鉴定霍乱弧菌和副溶血性弧菌分离株的能力来评估。将通过质谱获得的每个分离株的鉴定结果与全基因组测序(WGS)鉴定结果进行比较。MALDI-TOF MS系统在鉴定生长于非选择性固体琼脂培养基上的霍乱弧菌和副溶血性弧菌分离株方面表现出色。与API20E进行的生化鉴定不同。在本研究中,使用了161个分离株(霍乱弧菌,n = 33;副溶血性弧菌,n = 102;弧菌属,n = 23;其他肠道病原体,沙门氏菌和大肠杆菌,n = 3)来评估准确性。MALDI-TOF MS系统能够准确鉴定100%(33/33)的霍乱弧菌分离株和99.9%(101/102)的副溶血性弧菌分离株,霍乱弧菌的灵敏度和特异性均为100%,副溶血性弧菌的灵敏度为99%,特异性为98%。因此,用于细菌鉴定的质谱法与WGS相当。此外,与生化鉴定相比,使用MALDI-TOF MS系统可将分析时间从超过72小时缩短至不到24小时。关键点:• MALDI-TOF成功鉴定了霍乱弧菌和副溶血性弧菌• MALDI-TOF的灵敏度和特异性与WGS鉴定方法相当• MALDI-TOF比一系列依赖培养的方法快几天