• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

撰写文献年度综述。

Developing an Annual Review of the Literature.

作者信息

Amy Weinstein R, Karen Szauter, Nicholas Duca, Jackcy Jacob, Nadia Ismail, Amber Pincavage, Katherine Walsh, Irene Alexandraki

机构信息

Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J CME. 2024 Dec 25;14(1):2444726. doi: 10.1080/28338073.2024.2444726. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1080/28338073.2024.2444726
PMID:39776443
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11703470/
Abstract

Many national meetings and speaker series feature an "Annual Review of the Literature" (ARL) session in which an individual or team presents a sampling of articles, selected and prepared because they represent important current topics or new ideas in the discipline of interest. Despite this, there is little in the medical literature describing how to thoughtfully and systematically develop these sessions. We identify best practices that we have developed and used in the United States Clerkship Directors of Internal Medicine (CDIM) over many years. These include identification of a theme, team assembly, timeline development, search strategy and rubric development and employment, and presentation planning strategies. Employing the steps described can help facilitate this otherwise arduous process.

摘要

许多全国性会议和演讲系列都设有“文献年度回顾”(ARL)环节,由个人或团队展示一系列文章,这些文章经过挑选和准备,因为它们代表了当前该学科领域的重要主题或新观点。尽管如此,医学文献中很少有描述如何精心且系统地开展这些环节的内容。我们确定了多年来在美国内科实习主任(CDIM)中开发和使用的最佳实践方法。这些方法包括确定主题、组建团队、制定时间表、制定搜索策略和评分标准并加以应用,以及演讲规划策略。采用所描述的步骤有助于推动这个原本艰巨的过程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b634/11703470/ca67516e80d3/ZJEC_A_2444726_F0001_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b634/11703470/ca67516e80d3/ZJEC_A_2444726_F0001_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b634/11703470/ca67516e80d3/ZJEC_A_2444726_F0001_OC.jpg

相似文献

1
Developing an Annual Review of the Literature.撰写文献年度综述。
J CME. 2024 Dec 25;14(1):2444726. doi: 10.1080/28338073.2024.2444726. eCollection 2025.
2
Abstracts From the Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Meeting of the Clerkship Directors of Internal Medicine (CDIM).2015年内科实习主任年会(CDIM)会议记录摘要
Teach Learn Med. 2016 Jul-Sep;28(3):339-44. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2016.1187619. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
3
Teaching Safe Opioid Prescribing During the Opioid Epidemic: Results of the 2018 Clerkship Directors in Internal Medicine Survey.在阿片类药物流行期间教授安全开具阿片类药物处方:2018 年内科住院医师主任调查结果。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Dec;34(12):2812-2817. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05203-3. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
4
Implementing a systematic course/clerkship peer review process.实施一个系统的课程/见习同伴评审流程。
Acad Med. 2002 Sep;77(9):930-1. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200209000-00034.
5
Clinical Reasoning Education at US Medical Schools: Results from a National Survey of Internal Medicine Clerkship Directors.美国医学院的临床推理教育:内科实习主任全国调查结果。
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Nov;32(11):1242-1246. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4159-y. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
6
Exploring Perspectives from Internal Medicine Clerkship Directors in the USA on Effective Narrative Evaluation: Results from the CDIM National Survey.探索美国内科实习主任对有效叙事评估的看法:CDIM全国调查结果
Med Sci Educ. 2019 Oct 25;30(1):155-161. doi: 10.1007/s40670-019-00825-y. eCollection 2020 Mar.
7
When should students learn essential physical examination skills? Views of internal medicine clerkship directors in North America.学生应在何时学习基本体格检查技能?北美内科实习主任的观点。
Acad Med. 2008 Jan;83(1):96-9. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31815c68c3.
8
Clerkship Roles and Responsibilities in a Rapidly Changing Landscape: a National Survey of Internal Medicine Clerkship Directors.在快速变化的环境中临床实习的角色与职责:一项针对内科临床实习主任的全国性调查
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 May;35(5):1375-1381. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05610-6. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
9
Evaluation of a national curriculum reform effort for the medicine core clerkship.医学核心实习全国课程改革努力的评估
J Gen Intern Med. 2000 Jul;15(7):484-91. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.06429.x.
10
Improving the National Board of Medical Examiners internal Medicine Subject Exam for use in clerkship evaluation.改进美国国家医学考试委员会内科专业考试以用于临床实习评估。
J Gen Intern Med. 2002 Jun;17(6):435-40. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10673.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Twelve tips for adapting grand rounds for contemporary demands.十二条适应当代需求的大查房改编技巧。
Med Teach. 2022 Feb;44(2):144-148. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1898573. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
2
Twelve tips for undertaking a focused systematic review in medical education.开展医学教育聚焦式系统评价的 12 个技巧。
Med Teach. 2019 Nov;41(11):1232-1238. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1513642. Epub 2018 Nov 3.
3
The influence of the team in conducting a systematic review.团队在进行系统评价中的影响。
Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 1;6(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0548-x.
4
Conducting systematic reviews in medical education: a stepwise approach.在医学教育中进行系统评价:一种逐步的方法。
Med Educ. 2012 Oct;46(10):943-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04328.x.
5
Program evaluation models and related theories: AMEE guide no. 67.程序评估模型及相关理论:AMEE 指南第 67 号。
Med Teach. 2012;34(5):e288-99. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.668637.
6
Twelve tips for evaluating educational programs.评估教育项目的十二条建议。
Med Teach. 2010;32(4):296-301. doi: 10.3109/01421590903480121.
7
AMEE Education Guide no. 29: evaluating educational programmes.医学教育与培训学会教育指南第29号:评估教育项目
Med Teach. 2006 May;28(3):210-24. doi: 10.1080/01421590500271282.
8
Twelve tips for undertaking a systematic review.进行系统评价的十二个小贴士。
Med Teach. 2002 Jul;24(4):358-63. doi: 10.1080/01421590220145707.
9
AMEE Medical Education Guide No. 22: Refreshing lecturing: a guide for lecturers.《医学教育教师发展指南第22号:革新讲座:教师指南》
Med Teach. 2001 May;23(3):231-244. doi: 10.1080/01421590120043000.