相似文献
1
The influence of the team in conducting a systematic review.
Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 1;6(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0548-x.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
The problems with systematic reviews: a living systematic review.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2023 Apr;156:30-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.01.011. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 1;2014(10):MR000035. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000035.pub2.
6
Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach.
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015 Sep;13(3):132-40. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000055.
7
How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for Conducting and Reporting Narrative Reviews, Meta-Analyses, and Meta-Syntheses.
Annu Rev Psychol. 2019 Jan 4;70:747-770. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
8
Principles of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses.
Methods Mol Biol. 2022;2345:1-15. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1566-9_1.
9
Association between author conflicts of interest and industry-sponsorship with the favorability of outcomes of systematic reviews focusing on treatments of erectile dysfunction.
Andrology. 2021 Nov;9(6):1819-1827. doi: 10.1111/andr.13064. Epub 2021 Jul 10.
10
The contribution of systematic reviews to the practice of pediatric nephrology.
Pediatr Nephrol. 2013 Feb;28(2):197-206. doi: 10.1007/s00467-012-2155-3. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
引用本文的文献
1
Ethical integrity in systematic reviews and meta-analyses: challenges, pitfalls, and best practices in ophthalmology.
Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2025 Jul 31;14(2):40-49. doi: 10.51329/mehdiophthal1522. eCollection 2025 Summer.
2
Using GPT-4 for Title and Abstract Screening in a Literature Review of Public Policies: A Feasibility Study.
Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. 2025 May 22;3(3):e70031. doi: 10.1002/cesm.70031. eCollection 2025 May.
3
Guidance for systematic reviews in journal author instructions: Findings and recommendations for editorial teams.
Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. 2024 Mar 31;2(4):e12050. doi: 10.1002/cesm.12050. eCollection 2024 Apr.
4
Developing an Annual Review of the Literature.
J CME. 2024 Dec 25;14(1):2444726. doi: 10.1080/28338073.2024.2444726. eCollection 2025.
5
The Efficacy of Psychosocial Interventions in Minimising the Harm Caused to Affected Others of Problem Gambling: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
J Gambl Stud. 2023 Dec;39(4):1927-1958. doi: 10.1007/s10899-023-10220-3. Epub 2023 Jun 9.
6
Involvement of information specialists and statisticians in systematic reviews.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2023 Apr 25;39(1):e22. doi: 10.1017/S026646232300020X.
7
How to Conduct a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: A Guide for Clinicians.
Respir Care. 2023 Sep;68(9):1295-1308. doi: 10.4187/respcare.10971. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
8
Communication skills training for improving the communicative abilities of student social workers.
Campbell Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 23;19(1):e1309. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1309. eCollection 2023 Mar.
9
Machine learning computational tools to assist the performance of systematic reviews: A mapping review.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Dec 16;22(1):322. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01805-4.
10
The conduct and reporting of qualitative evidence syntheses in health and social care guidelines: a content analysis.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Oct 12;22(1):267. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01743-1.
本文引用的文献
1
Identifying approaches for assessing methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews: a descriptive study.
Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 19;6(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0507-6.
2
Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry.
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 27;7(2):e012545. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012545.
3
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on psoriasis: role of funding sources, conflict of interest and bibliometric indices as predictors of methodological quality.
Br J Dermatol. 2017 Jun;176(6):1633-1644. doi: 10.1111/bjd.15380. Epub 2017 May 19.
4
Poor methodological quality and reporting standards of systematic reviews in burn care management.
Int Wound J. 2017 Oct;14(5):754-763. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12692. Epub 2016 Dec 18.
5
Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study.
PLoS Med. 2016 May 24;13(5):e1002028. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002028. eCollection 2016 May.
6
Investigation of bias in meta-analyses due to selective inclusion of trial effect estimates: empirical study.
BMJ Open. 2016 Apr 27;6(4):e011863. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011863.
7
Conflicts of interest and spin in reviews of psychological therapies: a systematic review.
BMJ Open. 2016 Apr 26;6(4):e010606. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010606.
8
How do authors of systematic reviews deal with research malpractice and misconduct in original studies? A cross-sectional analysis of systematic reviews and survey of their authors.
BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 2;6(3):e010442. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010442.
9
Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature.
PLoS Biol. 2016 Jan 4;14(1):e1002333. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002333. eCollection 2016 Jan.
10
Disclosure of Financial Conflicts of Interests in Interventions to Improve Child Psychosocial Health: A Cross-Sectional Study.
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 25;10(11):e0142803. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142803. eCollection 2015.
Zotero 插件