Abraham Joanna, Holzer Katherine J, Pedamallu Lavanya, Kozower Benjamin D, Avidan Michael S, Lenze Eric J
Department of Anaesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
Institute for Informatics, Data Science and Biostatistics, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
Anaesthesia. 2025 Feb;80 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):54-64. doi: 10.1111/anae.16471. Epub 2025 Jan 8.
Oncologic surgeries are common and rates of depression and anxiety are high in the peri-operative period, potentially interfering with successful recovery.
We conducted a narrative review and meta-analysis focusing on randomised controlled trials evaluating the effect of peri-operative mental health interventions on anxiety and/or depression in adult patients having oncological surgery. The review included studies published in the last 5 years, identified through EMBASE with no pre-specified criteria for the type of comparison or outcome. A meta-analysis using a random effects model was performed for outcomes with sufficient data, and a vote-counting synthesis was performed for studies with insufficient data or fewer than two studies per outcome.
Seventeen randomised controlled trials were included. All were conducted internationally, primarily in Asia. Ten studies assessed psychological interventions (e.g. cognitive behavioural therapy), six assessed pharmacological interventions (e.g. ketamine) and one assessed acupuncture. Meta-analysis revealed significant intervention effects on pre-operative anxiety scores (n = 429, Hedge's g = -1.03, p = 0.001) and postoperative depression scores at hospital discharge (n = 188, Hedge's g = -0.88, p < 0.001), whereas no significant intervention effect was found in anxiety scores at discharge (n = 188, Hedge's g = -1.54, p = 0.08). Vote-counting synthesis identified intervention effects on depression and anxiety scores on day 3 postoperatively and on depression scores at one-week postoperatively, while all other time-points showed no intervention effect.
Psychological and pharmacological interventions are effective at reducing pre-operative anxiety and immediate postoperative depression scores in patients having oncological surgery, but these benefits do not persist postoperatively. Hence, future research efforts should focus on development and testing of interventions that are effective and implementable within the peri-operative context.
肿瘤外科手术很常见,围手术期抑郁和焦虑发生率很高,这可能会干扰康复进程。
我们进行了一项叙述性综述和荟萃分析,重点关注评估围手术期心理健康干预对接受肿瘤外科手术的成年患者焦虑和/或抑郁影响的随机对照试验。该综述纳入了过去5年发表的研究,通过EMBASE检索,对比较类型或结果没有预先设定的标准。对有足够数据的结果进行随机效应模型的荟萃分析,对数据不足或每个结果少于两项研究的进行计数合成。
纳入了17项随机对照试验。所有试验均在国际上进行,主要在亚洲。10项研究评估了心理干预(如认知行为疗法),6项评估了药物干预(如氯胺酮),1项评估了针灸。荟萃分析显示,干预对术前焦虑评分有显著影响(n = 429,Hedge's g = -1.03,p = 0.001),对出院时的术后抑郁评分有显著影响(n = 188,Hedge's g = -0.88,p < 0.001),而对出院时的焦虑评分没有显著干预效果(n = 188,Hedge's g = -1.54,p = 0.08)。计数合成确定了干预对术后第3天的抑郁和焦虑评分以及术后1周的抑郁评分有影响,而所有其他时间点均未显示干预效果。
心理和药物干预在降低肿瘤外科手术患者的术前焦虑和术后即刻抑郁评分方面有效,但这些益处术后并未持续存在。因此,未来的研究应集中在开发和测试在围手术期有效且可实施的干预措施上。