Suppr超能文献

Glittre-ADL测试采用三圈替代五圈测试。

Glittre-ADL tests in three laps as an alternative to the five laps test.

作者信息

Mendes Liliane Patrícia de Souza, Parreira Verônica Franco, Rocha Bianca Carmona, Spencer Lissa M, Velloso Marcelo, Alison Jennifer A

机构信息

Rehabilitation Sciences Program, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Department of Physiotherapy, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

出版信息

Respir Med. 2025 Feb;237:107945. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2025.107945. Epub 2025 Jan 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Glittre-ADL test is a comprehensive test to evaluate functional capacity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

AIM

The primary aim was to validate the Glittre-ADL test with and without the backpack performed in three laps as an alternative to five laps in people with COPD.

METHODS

Forty-eight participants with mild to severe COPD (mean ± SD age: 71 ± 7 years; FEV: 46 ± 17 %predicted) were recruited and performed two 6-min walk tests (visit 1); two Glittre-ADL tests with backpack (visit 2), and the Glittre-ADL test with and without the backpack, in random order (visit 3).

RESULTS

The Glittre-ADL tests were performed in five laps and symptoms, heart rate and oxygen saturation were recorded for three and five laps. The Glittre-ADL test performed in three laps provoked the same oxygen desaturation [mean ± SD oxygen saturation (SpO): 90 ± 6 vs 90 ± 6, p = 0.249] and rate of perceived exertion (RPE) [RPE legs: 2.91 ± 2.23 vs 3.08 ± 2.56, p = 0.380; RPE arms: 1.91 ± 1.77 vs 2.16 ± 1.92, p = 0.306] to the Glittre-ADL test performed in five laps for both Glittre with the backpack and without the backpack SpO [mean ± SD: 90 ± 6 vs 90 ± 7, p = 0.249], and RPE [legs: 3.02 ± 2.28 vs 3.25 ± 2.37, p = 0.380; arms: 2.13 ± 1.91 vs 2.03 ± 1.84, p = 0.306]. The heart rate and dyspnoea were significantly lower for both Glittre-ADL tests performed in three laps.

CONCLUSION

The 3-lap Glittre-ADL test may be a more practical alternative to the 5-lap test, while still remaining a good test of functional capacity for activities of daily living.

摘要

背景

Glittre-ADL测试是一项用于评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者功能能力的综合测试。

目的

主要目的是验证在慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中,背负背包和不背负背包进行三圈的Glittre-ADL测试能否替代五圈测试。

方法

招募了48名轻度至重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者(平均年龄±标准差:71±7岁;第一秒用力呼气容积:46±17%预计值),并让他们进行两次6分钟步行测试(第一次就诊);两次背负背包的Glittre-ADL测试(第二次就诊),以及随机顺序进行的背负背包和不背负背包的Glittre-ADL测试(第三次就诊)。

结果

Glittre-ADL测试进行五圈,并记录三圈和五圈时的症状、心率和血氧饱和度。进行三圈的Glittre-ADL测试引起的血氧饱和度下降[平均±标准差血氧饱和度(SpO):90±6 vs 90±6,p = 0.249]和主观用力程度(RPE)率[腿部RPE:2.91±2.23 vs 3.08±2.56,p = 0.380;手臂RPE:1.91±1.77 vs 2.16±1.92,p = 0.306]与进行五圈的Glittre-ADL测试相同,无论是背负背包还是不背负背包的Glittre-ADL测试SpO[平均±标准差:90±6 vs 90±7,p = 0.249]和RPE[腿部:3.02±2.28 vs 3.25±2.37,p = 0.380;手臂:2.13±1.91 vs 2.03±1.84,p = 0.306]。两种进行三圈的Glittre-ADL测试的心率和呼吸困难程度均显著较低。

结论

三圈的Glittre-ADL测试可能是五圈测试更实用的替代方法,同时仍然是日常生活活动功能能力的良好测试。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验