Terra Renata Maria Oleniki, Sutil Elisama, Ferreira Cordeiro Deisy Cristina, Favoreto Michael Willian, Faria-E-Silva André, Best Al M, Loguercio Alessandro D, Reis Alessandra
J Am Dent Assoc. 2025 Jan;156(1):57-67.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2024.10.010.
This single-blind, noninferiority trial evaluated whether 10% carbamide peroxide (CP) applied for 2 or 4 hours daily is noninferior to 8 hours.
A total of 120 healthy adults, with teeth shade A2 or darker, were randomly allocated to 3 groups (n = 40). All participants used 10% CP gel in a bleaching tray for 2, 4, and 8 hours daily for 14 days, with the option to extend treatment if they were dissatisfied. Color change was measured using a spectrophotometer and shade guides at baseline, every 5 days, and 1 month posttreatment. Risk and intensity of tooth sensitivity (TS) were assessed daily using a 0 through 10 visual analog scale. Satisfaction was recorded via a Likert scale wherein 1 corresponded to very dissatisfied and 7 corresponded to very satisfied and the Orofacial Esthetic Scale. Noninferiority was tested for color change using the 1976 formula (ΔEab) at 1 month postbleaching (primary outcome), color change using the 2000 formula (ΔE00), Whiteness Index, and shade guide units, whereas TS and satisfaction were analyzed with χ, analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis, and Friedman tests.
Color change in ΔEab (2 vs 8 h: mean difference, -0.6; 90% CI, -2.1 to 1.0, 4 vs 8 h: mean difference, 0.0; 90% CI, -1.6 to 1.6) and ΔE00 values for shorter durations were noninferior to 8 hours at 1 month. Whiteness Index results were inconclusive. TS risk and intensity were similar (P > .05), and patient satisfaction improved across all groups similarly (P > .05).
Shorter 2- and 4-hour daily bleaching with 10% CP is noninferior to the 8-hour protocol.
Shorter periods of at-home bleaching (2 and 4 h) can be prescribed depending on the patient's availability or preferences without jeopardizing the bleaching efficacy. This clinical trial was registered at Registro Brasileiro de Ensaios Clínicos (RBR-10vvfpcm).
这项单盲、非劣效性试验评估了每日使用10%过氧化脲(CP)2小时或4小时是否不劣于8小时。
总共120名牙齿颜色为A2或更深的健康成年人被随机分为3组(每组n = 40)。所有参与者每天在漂白托盘中使用10% CP凝胶2小时、4小时和8小时,持续14天,如果不满意可选择延长治疗时间。在基线、每5天以及治疗后1个月时,使用分光光度计和比色板测量颜色变化。每天使用0至10的视觉模拟量表评估牙齿敏感(TS)的风险和强度。通过李克特量表记录满意度,其中1表示非常不满意,7表示非常满意,以及口面部美学量表。在漂白后1个月使用1976公式(ΔEab)对颜色变化进行非劣效性测试(主要结局),使用2000公式(ΔE00)、白度指数和比色板单位进行颜色变化测试,而TS和满意度则通过χ²检验、方差分析、Kruskal-Wallis检验和Friedman检验进行分析。
在1个月时,较短时长的ΔEab颜色变化(2小时与8小时:平均差异,-0.6;90% CI,-2.1至1.0,4小时与8小时:平均差异,0.0;90% CI,-1.6至1.6)和ΔE00值不劣于8小时。白度指数结果尚无定论。TS风险和强度相似(P >.05),并且所有组的患者满意度均有类似提高(P >.05)。
每日使用10% CP进行2小时和4小时的较短时间漂白不劣于8小时方案。
可以根据患者的时间安排或偏好开出较短时间的家庭漂白(2小时和4小时),而不会影响漂白效果。本临床试验已在巴西临床试验注册中心(RBR-10vvfpcm)注册。