Al-Abdulmunem Monirah, Kozelka Ellen E, Acquilano Stephanie C, Drake Robert E, Carpenter-Song Elizabeth, Elwyn Glyn
Social Policy and Economics Research, Westat, Lebanon, NH, USA.
Department of Anthropology, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.
Community Ment Health J. 2025 Jul;61(5):989-993. doi: 10.1007/s10597-024-01439-4. Epub 2025 Jan 8.
This pilot study evaluated the feasibility of the technology specialist intervention, which assists clients in achieving mental health recovery and well-being goals via existing digital tools in a real-world community mental health setting. Thirteen adult clients with serious mental illness and their providers completed baseline, 3-, and 6-month assessments, including goal setting, self-efficacy, activation, and acceptability measures, along with weekly ecological momentary assessments. Clients selected goals and corresponding tools, used the tools steadily, and showed improvement in activation and self-efficacy. Most participating clients (82%, n = 9) and providers (80%, n = 8) found the intervention acceptable. These preliminary findings show that the technology specialist intervention is promising and warrants further testing.
这项试点研究评估了技术专家干预措施的可行性，该干预措施通过现实社区心理健康环境中的现有数字工具，帮助客户实现心理健康恢复和幸福目标。13名患有严重精神疾病的成年客户及其提供者完成了基线、3个月和6个月的评估，包括目标设定、自我效能感、积极性和可接受性测量，以及每周的生态瞬时评估。客户选择目标和相应工具，持续使用这些工具，并在积极性和自我效能感方面有所改善。大多数参与的客户（82%，n = 9）和提供者（80%，n = 8）认为该干预措施是可接受的。这些初步研究结果表明，技术专家干预措施很有前景，值得进一步测试。
