• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项支持精神卫生保健中共同决策的移动健康干预措施:开发与可用性

A Mobile Health Intervention to Support Collaborative Decision-Making in Mental Health Care: Development and Usability.

作者信息

Romm Kristin Lie, Skoge Mari, Barrett Elizabeth Ann, Berentzen Lars-Christian, Bergsager Dagfinn, Fugelli Pål, Bjella Thomas, Gardsjord Erlend Strand, Kling Kristine, Kruse Sindre Hembre, Kværner Kari Jorunn, Melle Ingrid, Mork Erlend, Ihler Henrik Myhre, Rognli Eline Borger, Simonsen Carmen, Værnes Tor Gunnar, Aminoff Sofie Ragnhild

机构信息

Early Intervention in Psychosis Advisory Unit for South-East Norway, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jan 17;9:e57614. doi: 10.2196/57614.

DOI:10.2196/57614
PMID:39823632
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11786142/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Shared decision-making between clinicians and service users is crucial in mental health care. One significant barrier to achieving this goal is the lack of user-centered services. Integrating digital tools into mental health services holds promise for addressing some of these challenges. However, the implementation of digital tools, such as mobile apps, remains limited, and attrition rates for mental health apps are typically high. Design thinking can support the development of tools tailored to the needs of service users and clinicians.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to develop and beta test a digital tool designed for individuals with severe mental disorders or substance use disorders to facilitate shared decision-making on treatment goals and strategies within mental health services.

METHODS

We used a user-centered design approach to develop iTandem, an app facilitating collaborative treatment between service users and clinicians. Through qualitative interviews and workshops, we engaged 6 service users with severe mental disorders or substance use disorders, 6 clinicians, and 1 relative to identify and design relevant app modules. A beta test of iTandem was conducted to refine the app and plan for a pilot trial in a clinical setting. After 6 weeks of app use, 5 clinicians and 4 service users were interviewed to provide feedback on the concept, implementation, and technical issues. Safety and ethical considerations were thoroughly discussed and addressed.

RESULTS

To avoid overload for the service users, we applied a pragmatic take on module content and size. Thus, iTandem includes the following 8 modules, primarily based on the needs of service users and clinicians: Sleep (sleep diary), Medication (intake and side effects), Recovery (measures, including well-being and personal recovery, and exercises, including good things and personal strengths), Mood (mood diary and report of daily feelings), Psychosis (level of positive symptoms and their consequences and level of negative symptoms), Activity (goal setting and progress), Substance use (weekly use, potential triggers or strategies used to abstain), and Feedback on therapy (of individual sessions and overall rating of the past week). For the beta testing, service users and clinicians collaborated in choosing 2-3 modules in iTandem to work with during treatment sessions. The testing showed that the app was well received by service users, and that facilitation for implementation is crucial.

CONCLUSIONS

iTandem and similar apps have the potential to enhance treatment outcomes by facilitating shared decision-making and tailoring treatment to the needs of service users. However, successful implementation requires thorough testing, iterative development, and evaluations of both utility and treatment effects. There is a critical need to focus on how technology integrates into clinical settings-from development to implementation-and to conduct further research on early health technology assessments to guide these processes.

摘要

背景

临床医生与服务使用者之间的共同决策在精神卫生保健中至关重要。实现这一目标的一个重大障碍是缺乏以用户为中心的服务。将数字工具整合到精神卫生服务中有望应对其中一些挑战。然而,数字工具(如移动应用程序)的实施仍然有限,精神卫生应用程序的流失率通常很高。设计思维可以支持开发适合服务使用者和临床医生需求的工具。

目的

本研究旨在开发并进行iTandem数字工具的beta测试,该工具专为患有严重精神障碍或物质使用障碍的个体设计,以促进精神卫生服务中关于治疗目标和策略的共同决策。

方法

我们采用以用户为中心的设计方法来开发iTandem,这是一款促进服务使用者和临床医生之间协作治疗的应用程序。通过定性访谈和研讨会,我们邀请了6名患有严重精神障碍或物质使用障碍的服务使用者、6名临床医生和1名亲属来识别和设计相关的应用程序模块。对iTandem进行了beta测试,以完善该应用程序并为临床环境中的试点试验制定计划。在应用程序使用6周后,对5名临床医生和4名服务使用者进行了访谈,以提供关于概念、实施和技术问题的反馈。对安全和伦理考量进行了充分讨论并加以解决。

结果

为避免服务使用者负担过重,我们对模块内容和大小采取了务实的做法。因此,iTandem包括以下8个模块,主要基于服务使用者和临床医生的需求:睡眠(睡眠日记)、药物治疗(用药情况和副作用)、康复(措施,包括幸福感和个人康复,以及练习,包括好事和个人优势)、情绪(情绪日记和每日感受报告)、精神病症状(阳性症状水平及其后果和阴性症状水平)、活动(目标设定和进展)、物质使用(每周使用情况、潜在触发因素或用于戒除的策略)以及治疗反馈(个别疗程和过去一周的总体评分)。对于beta测试,服务使用者和临床医生合作在iTandem中选择2 - 3个模块在治疗过程中使用。测试表明该应用程序受到服务使用者的好评,并且实施过程中的便利措施至关重要。

结论

iTandem及类似应用程序有潜力通过促进共同决策并根据服务使用者的需求定制治疗来提高治疗效果。然而,成功实施需要进行全面测试、迭代开发以及对效用和治疗效果的评估。迫切需要关注技术如何从开发到实施融入临床环境,并对早期卫生技术评估进行进一步研究以指导这些过程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa8f/11786142/d5aba59d3a22/formative_v9i1e57614_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa8f/11786142/f3c5427f00d4/formative_v9i1e57614_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa8f/11786142/1cb7291ea1b9/formative_v9i1e57614_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa8f/11786142/d5aba59d3a22/formative_v9i1e57614_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa8f/11786142/f3c5427f00d4/formative_v9i1e57614_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa8f/11786142/1cb7291ea1b9/formative_v9i1e57614_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa8f/11786142/d5aba59d3a22/formative_v9i1e57614_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
A Mobile Health Intervention to Support Collaborative Decision-Making in Mental Health Care: Development and Usability.一项支持精神卫生保健中共同决策的移动健康干预措施:开发与可用性
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jan 17;9:e57614. doi: 10.2196/57614.
2
Applying User-Centered Design in the Development of a Supportive mHealth App for Women in Substance Use Recovery.运用以用户为中心的设计理念开发一款支持物质使用康复女性的移动健康应用。
Am J Health Promot. 2023 Jan;37(1):56-64. doi: 10.1177/08901171221113834. Epub 2022 Jul 10.
3
User-Centered Development of STOP (Successful Treatment for Paranoia): Material Development and Usability Testing for a Digital Therapeutic for Paranoia.以用户为中心的 STOP(成功治疗妄想症)开发:用于妄想症的数字治疗的材料开发和可用性测试。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 Dec 8;10:e45453. doi: 10.2196/45453.
4
Co-Designing a Web-Based and Tablet App to Evaluate Clinical Outcomes of Early Psychosis Service Users in a Learning Health Care Network: User-Centered Design Workshop and Pilot Study.在学习型医疗网络中共同设计基于网络和平板电脑的应用程序,以评估早期精神病服务使用者的临床结果:以用户为中心的设计研讨会和试点研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Apr 9;12:e65889. doi: 10.2196/65889.
5
"They Can't Believe They're a Tiger": Insights from pediatric speech-language pathologist mobile app users and app designers.“他们不敢相信自己是只老虎”:来自儿科言语病理学家移动应用程序用户和应用程序设计师的见解。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2023 Sep-Oct;58(5):1717-1737. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12898. Epub 2023 May 23.
6
A Mobile Health Approach for Improving Outcomes in Suicide Prevention (SafePlan).移动医疗在预防自杀中的应用(SafePlan)。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 30;22(7):e17481. doi: 10.2196/17481.
7
Evaluating User Experience and Satisfaction in a Concussion Rehabilitation App: Usability Study.评估一款脑震荡康复应用程序中的用户体验和满意度:可用性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Apr 11;9:e67275. doi: 10.2196/67275.
8
A User-Centered Design Approach for a Screening App for People With Cognitive Impairment (digiDEM-SCREEN): Development and Usability Study.一种针对认知障碍患者的筛查应用程序(digiDEM-SCREEN)的以用户为中心的设计方法:开发与可用性研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Jan 22;12:e65022. doi: 10.2196/65022.
9
Proposal for the User-Centered Design Approach for Health Apps Based on Successful Experiences: Integrative Review.基于成功经验的健康类 APP 用户为中心的设计方法建议:综合回顾。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Apr 22;8(4):e14376. doi: 10.2196/14376.
10
Digital Health Equity and Tailored Health Care Service for People With Disability: User-Centered Design and Usability Study.数字健康公平与残疾人定制化医疗服务:以用户为中心的设计和可用性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Nov 28;25:e50029. doi: 10.2196/50029.

引用本文的文献

1
A Mobile App Designed to Promote Shared Decision-Making in the Treatment of Psychotic Disorders: Feasibility and Acceptability Study.一款旨在促进精神病性障碍治疗中共同决策的移动应用程序:可行性与可接受性研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Jul 11;12:e68813. doi: 10.2196/68813.

本文引用的文献

1
Crossing boundaries in the delivery of healthcare - a qualitative study of an eHealth intervention in relation to boundary object theory.医疗保健服务中的跨界——一项关于电子健康干预与边界对象理论关系的定性研究
Digit Health. 2023 Aug 30;9:20552076231196970. doi: 10.1177/20552076231196970. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
2
A transdiagnostic approach to negative symptoms: exploring factor structure and negative symptoms in bipolar disorders.阴性症状的跨诊断方法:探索双相情感障碍的因子结构和阴性症状
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jun 16;14:1136097. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1136097. eCollection 2023.
3
Measuring Patient Experience and Patient Satisfaction-How Are We Doing It and Why Does It Matter? A Comparison of European and U.S. American Approaches.
衡量患者体验与患者满意度——我们是如何进行的以及为何重要?欧美方法比较
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Mar 8;11(6):797. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11060797.
4
Goal planning in mental health service delivery: A systematic integrative review.心理健康服务提供中的目标规划:一项系统综合综述。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Dec 19;13:1057915. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1057915. eCollection 2022.
5
Digital therapeutics for mental health: Is attrition the Achilles heel?心理健康的数字疗法:损耗是其致命弱点吗?
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Aug 5;13:900615. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.900615. eCollection 2022.
6
Human-Centered Design Approaches in Digital Mental Health Interventions: Exploratory Mapping Review.数字心理健康干预中的以人为本设计方法:探索性映射综述
JMIR Ment Health. 2022 Jun 7;9(6):e35591. doi: 10.2196/35591.
7
The Time is Ripe for a Consensus Definition of Clinical Recovery in First-episode Psychosis: Suggestions Based on a 10-Year Follow-up Study.首次发作精神病的临床康复共识定义时机已成熟:基于 10 年随访研究的建议。
Schizophr Bull. 2022 Jun 21;48(4):839-849. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbac035.
8
Cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia: An expert group paper on the current state of the art.精神分裂症中的认知功能障碍:关于当前技术水平的专家小组论文
Schizophr Res Cogn. 2022 Mar 22;29:100249. doi: 10.1016/j.scog.2022.100249. eCollection 2022 Sep.
9
Centredness in health care: A systematic overview of reviews.医疗保健中的以患者为中心:系统评价综述。
Health Expect. 2022 Jun;25(3):885-901. doi: 10.1111/hex.13461. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
10
Associations between personal recovery and service user-rated versus clinician-rated clinical recovery, a cross-sectional study.个人康复与服务使用者评定与临床医生评定的临床康复之间的关联:一项横断面研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Jan 18;22(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-03691-y.