• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用蔗渣灰和石粉优化混凝土可持续性及其对力学性能和耐久性的影响。

Optimizing concrete sustainability with bagasse ash and stone dust and its impact on mechanical properties and durability.

作者信息

Khan Muhammad Adeel, Zhang Boshan, Ahmad Mahmood, Niekurzak Mariusz, Khan Muhammad Salman, Sabri Sabri Mohanad Muayad, Chen Weizhen

机构信息

College of Civil Engineering, Department of Bridge Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China.

Institute of Energy Infrastructure, Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Kajang, 43000, Malaysia.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 9;15(1):1385. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-85363-x.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-85363-x
PMID:39779787
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11711513/
Abstract

Addressing environmental challenges such as pollution and resource depletion requires innovative industrial and municipal waste management approaches. Cement production, a significant contributor to greenhouse gas emissions, highlights the need for eco-friendly building materials to combat global warming and promote sustainability. This study evaluates the simultaneous use of Sugarcane Bagasse Ash (SCBA) and Stone Dust (SD) as partial replacements by volume for cement and sand, respectively, at varying ratios in eco-strength concrete mixes designed for 28 MPa (ES-28) and 34 MPa (ES-34), emphasizing their economic and environmental benefits. The influence of SCBA and SD on workability, mechanical properties, and durability were experimentally investigated. Results reveal that for ES-28, with 9% SCBA and 50% SD, compressive and tensile strengths were nearly equal to the control mix, while flexural strength improved by 6.86%. For ES-34, with 9% SCBA and 50% SD, compressive strength was enhanced by 10.16%, tensile strength by 11.68%, and flexural strength by 5.22%, compared to the control mix. This improvement is attributed to pozzolanic reactions, enhanced particle packing, and optimal curing conditions. However, water absorption increased significantly, with ES-28 showing a 31.61% rise and ES-34 a 22.32% rise when SCBA was 9% and SD was 50%. These results highlight the trade-offs between mechanical performance and durability. The optimized mix, derived from response surface analysis, demonstrates significant potential as a sustainable alternative to conventional concrete, aligning with environmental and structural performance objectives.

摘要

应对污染和资源枯竭等环境挑战需要创新的工业和城市废物管理方法。水泥生产是温室气体排放的重要来源,这凸显了使用环保建筑材料来应对全球变暖并促进可持续发展的必要性。本研究评估了在设计用于28兆帕(ES - 28)和34兆帕(ES - 34)的生态强度混凝土混合料中,分别以不同比例同时使用甘蔗渣灰(SCBA)和石粉(SD)按体积分别部分替代水泥和沙子的情况,强调了它们的经济和环境效益。通过实验研究了SCBA和SD对工作性、力学性能和耐久性的影响。结果表明,对于ES - 28,当含有9%的SCBA和50%的SD时,抗压强度和抗拉强度几乎与对照混合料相等,而抗弯强度提高了6.86%。对于ES - 34,当含有9%的SCBA和50%的SD时,与对照混合料相比,抗压强度提高了10.16%,抗拉强度提高了11.68%,抗弯强度提高了5.22%。这种改善归因于火山灰反应、颗粒堆积增强和最佳养护条件。然而,吸水率显著增加,当SCBA为9%且SD为50%时,ES - 28的吸水率上升了31.61%,ES - 34的吸水率上升了22.32%。这些结果突出了力学性能和耐久性之间的权衡。通过响应面分析得出的优化混合料显示出作为传统混凝土可持续替代品的巨大潜力,符合环境和结构性能目标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9015/11711513/10d412a9ebe3/41598_2025_85363_Fig20_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9015/11711513/fc78a8d8b056/41598_2025_85363_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9015/11711513/fb0784219b1e/41598_2025_85363_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9015/11711513/69330252bb69/41598_2025_85363_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9015/11711513/1b01d7c7f44c/41598_2025_85363_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9015/11711513/c9f770426fdd/41598_2025_85363_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9015/11711513/b7ddd5a88a3f/41598_2025_85363_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9015/11711513/3c94b52112b1/41598_2025_85363_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9015/11711513/8dae167d36d9/41598_2025_85363_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9015/11711513/8f461615f569/41598_2025_85363_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9015/11711513/96d13b635634/41598_2025_85363_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9015/11711513/34cf881f4944/41598_2025_85363_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9015/11711513/834730dd71d0/41598_2025_85363_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9015/11711513/202bad5d062d/41598_2025_85363_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9015/11711513/6672342bce33/41598_2025_85363_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9015/11711513/9c5dff1acf01/41598_2025_85363_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9015/11711513/aa473da40b01/41598_2025_85363_Fig16_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9015/11711513/675de9a28f46/41598_2025_85363_Fig17_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9015/11711513/ca52294c9b0f/41598_2025_85363_Fig18_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9015/11711513/19a2c5a885c2/41598_2025_85363_Fig19_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9015/11711513/10d412a9ebe3/41598_2025_85363_Fig20_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9015/11711513/fc78a8d8b056/41598_2025_85363_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9015/11711513/fb0784219b1e/41598_2025_85363_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9015/11711513/69330252bb69/41598_2025_85363_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9015/11711513/1b01d7c7f44c/41598_2025_85363_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9015/11711513/c9f770426fdd/41598_2025_85363_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9015/11711513/b7ddd5a88a3f/41598_2025_85363_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9015/11711513/3c94b52112b1/41598_2025_85363_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9015/11711513/8dae167d36d9/41598_2025_85363_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9015/11711513/8f461615f569/41598_2025_85363_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9015/11711513/96d13b635634/41598_2025_85363_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9015/11711513/34cf881f4944/41598_2025_85363_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9015/11711513/834730dd71d0/41598_2025_85363_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9015/11711513/202bad5d062d/41598_2025_85363_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9015/11711513/6672342bce33/41598_2025_85363_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9015/11711513/9c5dff1acf01/41598_2025_85363_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9015/11711513/aa473da40b01/41598_2025_85363_Fig16_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9015/11711513/675de9a28f46/41598_2025_85363_Fig17_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9015/11711513/ca52294c9b0f/41598_2025_85363_Fig18_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9015/11711513/19a2c5a885c2/41598_2025_85363_Fig19_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9015/11711513/10d412a9ebe3/41598_2025_85363_Fig20_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Optimizing concrete sustainability with bagasse ash and stone dust and its impact on mechanical properties and durability.利用蔗渣灰和石粉优化混凝土可持续性及其对力学性能和耐久性的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 9;15(1):1385. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-85363-x.
2
Use of waste recycling coal bottom ash and sugarcane bagasse ash as cement and sand replacement material to produce sustainable concrete.利用废煤底灰和甘蔗渣灰替代水泥和砂生产可持续混凝土。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jul;29(35):52399-52411. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19478-3. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
3
Mechanical and physical characteristics of concrete mixed with sugarcane bagasse ash and recycled polyethylene terephthalate.掺甘蔗渣灰和回收聚对苯二甲酸乙二酯的混凝土的力学和物理特性
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 18;10(18):e38065. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38065. eCollection 2024 Sep 30.
4
Influence of Sugarcane Bagasse Ash and Silica Fume on the Mechanical and Durability Properties of Concrete.甘蔗渣灰和硅灰对混凝土力学性能及耐久性的影响
Materials (Basel). 2022 Apr 21;15(9):3018. doi: 10.3390/ma15093018.
5
Combined effect of coconut shell and sugarcane bagasse ashes on the workability, mechanical properties and embodied carbon of concrete.椰壳和甘蔗渣灰对混凝土工作性、力学性能和碳排放量的综合影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jan;29(4):5207-5223. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16034-3. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
6
Explainable artificial intelligence-based compressive strength optimization and Life-Cycle Assessment of eco-friendly sugarcane bagasse ash concrete.基于可解释人工智能的生态友好型甘蔗渣灰混凝土抗压强度优化及生命周期评估
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2025 Mar;32(11):6922-6947. doi: 10.1007/s11356-025-36148-2. Epub 2025 Mar 1.
7
Evaluating the combined effect of sugarcane bagasse ash, metakaolin, and polypropylene fibers in sustainable construction.评估甘蔗渣灰、偏高岭土和聚丙烯纤维在可持续建筑中的综合效果。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 30;14(1):26109. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76360-7.
8
Artificial intelligence prediction of the mechanical properties of banana peel-ash and bagasse blended geopolymer concrete.香蕉皮灰与甘蔗渣混合地质聚合物混凝土力学性能的人工智能预测
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 30;14(1):26151. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-77144-9.
9
Eco-Friendly Incorporation of Crumb Rubber and Waste Bagasse Ash in Bituminous Concrete Mix.将橡胶粉和废弃甘蔗渣灰环保地掺入沥青混凝土混合料中。
Materials (Basel). 2022 Mar 29;15(7):2509. doi: 10.3390/ma15072509.
10
Experimental study on fresh, mechanical properties and embodied carbon of concrete blended with sugarcane bagasse ash, metakaolin, and millet husk ash as ternary cementitious material.利用甘蔗渣灰、偏高岭土和小米糠灰作为三元胶凝材料的混凝土的新鲜性能、力学性能和隐含碳的实验研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jan;29(4):5224-5239. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15954-4. Epub 2021 Aug 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Mechanical and environmental performance of sugarcane Bagasse Ash from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa in sustainable concrete.开伯尔-普赫图赫瓦省甘蔗渣灰在可持续混凝土中的力学性能和环境性能
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 8;15(1):24571. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10383-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Prediction of Strength Properties of Concrete Containing Waste Marble Aggregate and Stone Dust-Modeling and Optimization Using RSM.含有废弃大理石骨料和石粉的混凝土强度性能预测——基于响应面法的建模与优化
Materials (Basel). 2022 Nov 14;15(22):8024. doi: 10.3390/ma15228024.
2
Predicting the strength of concrete made with stone dust and nylon fiber using artificial neural network.使用人工神经网络预测用石粉和尼龙纤维制成的混凝土的强度。
Heliyon. 2022 Mar 18;8(3):e09129. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09129. eCollection 2022 Mar.
3
Construction and demolition waste as recycled aggregate for environmentally friendly concrete paving.
建筑和拆除废物作为再生骨料用于环保型混凝土铺路。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Feb;29(7):9826-9840. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15849-4. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
4
Experimental study on fresh, mechanical properties and embodied carbon of concrete blended with sugarcane bagasse ash, metakaolin, and millet husk ash as ternary cementitious material.利用甘蔗渣灰、偏高岭土和小米糠灰作为三元胶凝材料的混凝土的新鲜性能、力学性能和隐含碳的实验研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jan;29(4):5224-5239. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15954-4. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
5
Pozzolanic properties of ultrafine sugar cane bagasse ash produced by controlled burning.通过控制燃烧产生的超细甘蔗渣灰的火山灰性质
Heliyon. 2019 Oct 9;5(10):e02566. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02566. eCollection 2019 Oct.
6
Time is running out for sand.沙子的时间不多了。
Nature. 2019 Jul;571(7763):29-31. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-02042-4.
7
Agricultural Solid Waste as Source of Supplementary Cementitious Materials in Developing Countries.农业固体废物作为发展中国家补充胶凝材料的来源。
Materials (Basel). 2019 Apr 3;12(7):1112. doi: 10.3390/ma12071112.
8
A looming tragedy of the sand commons.一场迫在眉睫的沙地公地悲剧。
Science. 2017 Sep 8;357(6355):970-971. doi: 10.1126/science.aao0503.
9
Cement replacement by sugar cane bagasse ash: CO2 emissions reduction and potential for carbon credits.用甘蔗渣灰替代水泥:减少二氧化碳排放和碳信用额度的潜力。
J Environ Manage. 2010 Sep;91(9):1864-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.04.008. Epub 2010 May 20.
10
Use of Brazilian sugarcane bagasse ash in concrete as sand replacement.利用巴西甘蔗渣灰替代混凝土中的沙子。
Waste Manag. 2010 Jun;30(6):1114-22. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.01.026. Epub 2010 Feb 18.