Igarashi Yu, Tateishi Seiichiro, Matsuoka Juri, Sawajima Tomoko, Kawasumi Mika, Harada Arisa, Mori Koji
Disaster Occupational Health Center, Institute of Industrial Ecological Sciences, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, 1-1 Iseigaoka, Yahatanishi-ku, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, 807-8555, Japan.
HOYA CORPORATION, Tokyo, Japan.
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jan 8;25(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-21219-9.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, information and circumstances changed from moment to moment, including the accumulation of scientific knowledge, the emergence of variants, social tolerance, and government policy. Therefore, it was important to adapt workplace countermeasures punctually and flexibly based on scientific evidence and according to circumstances. However, there has been no assessment of changes in workplace countermeasures. With a view toward preparedness for future pandemics, we surveyed COVID-19 workplace countermeasures that occupational physicians considered as needing to be changed but went unchanged.
We invited 685 professional occupational physicians certified by Japan Society for Occupational Health to complete an online questionnaire by sending postcards with QR codes. The main questions concerned countermeasures that the participants wanted to change but could not. The survey period was from February 21 to April 28, 2022. The responses were analyzed using the KJ method.
Of the 168 invitees (24.5%) who responded to the survey, 125 reported countermeasures that needed to be changed (total count: 254). The responses were categorized into basic systems, occupational health services, workplace countermeasures, vaccines, and incidents, with a code count of 7, 8,147, 10, and 82, respectively. The type of countermeasure was 115 for countermeasures to be strengthened (CBS), 110 for measures to be mitigated (CBM), and 29 for neither.
Often-mentioned CBS were increased teleworking, strengthened ventilation, smoking cessation, and promotion of vaccines. Often-mentioned CBM were relaxation of protective equipment rules, discontinued environmental disinfection, and shorted isolation and reinstatement. In the early pandemic phases, CBSs were frequently mentioned, whereas CBMs were featured more prominently in the latter phases. The survey revealed countermeasures that occupational physicians thought needed to be changed but were not changed in practice. For future responses to emerging and reemerging infectious diseases, it will be necessary to establish rules compatible with flexible modification of workplace countermeasures in response to changing circumstances.
在新冠疫情期间,信息和情况时刻都在变化,包括科学知识的积累、变异毒株的出现、社会容忍度以及政府政策。因此,根据科学证据并视情况及时灵活地调整工作场所应对措施非常重要。然而,尚未对工作场所应对措施的变化进行评估。为了做好应对未来大流行的准备,我们调查了职业医生认为需要改变但未改变的新冠疫情工作场所应对措施。
我们邀请了685名获得日本职业健康协会认证的专业职业医生通过发送带有二维码的明信片来完成在线问卷。主要问题涉及参与者想要改变但无法改变的应对措施。调查期为2022年2月21日至4月28日。使用KJ法对回复进行分析。
在168名回复调查的受邀者(24.5%)中,125人报告了需要改变的应对措施(共计254项)。回复被分为基本系统、职业健康服务、工作场所应对措施、疫苗和事件,代码数量分别为7、8、147、10和82。应对措施的类型为115项需要加强的措施(CBS)、110项需要减轻的措施(CBM)和29项两者都不需要的措施。
经常提到的需要加强的措施包括增加远程办公、加强通风、戒烟和推广疫苗。经常提到的需要减轻的措施包括放宽防护设备规定、停止环境消毒以及缩短隔离和恢复时间。在疫情早期阶段,经常提到需要加强的措施,而在后期阶段,需要减轻的措施更为突出。该调查揭示了职业医生认为需要改变但在实践中未改变的应对措施。对于未来应对新出现和再次出现的传染病,有必要制定与根据情况灵活修改工作场所应对措施相兼容的规则。