Mao Zuming, Yang Qiang, Meng Xiangyu, Jiang Dong, Zhao Feng
Key Laboratory for Biomechanics and Mechanobiology of Ministry of Education, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, 100083, China.
Department of Sports Medicine, Beijing Key Laboratory of Sports Injuries, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jan 9;20(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05401-8.
Meniscus tears can change the biomechanical environment of the knee joint and might accelerate the development of osteoarthritis. The aim of this study was to investigate the dynamic biomechanical effects of different medial meniscus tear positions and tear gaps on the knee during walking.
Seven finite element models of the knee joint were constructed, including the intact medial meniscus (IMM), radial stable tears in the anterior, middle, and posterior one-third regions of the medial meniscus (RSTA, RSTM, RSTP), and the corresponding unstable tears (RUTA, RUTM, RUTP). The seven models applied a 1000 N axial static load and a human walking load, as defined by the ISO14243-1 standard.
Compared with the results under static loading, the axial load ratio of the medial and lateral compartments was redistributed (ranging from 0.7:1 to 2.9:1). The stress concentration was in the middle and posterior portions of the lateral compartment, not in the anterior and middle portions of the medial compartment under dynamic analysis. Compared with that of the IMM, the maximum von Mises stress on the medial meniscus increased by approximately 24.68-57.14% in the RUTA, RUTM, and RSTM models, with a greater difference observed in the hoop stress on both sides of the radial tear. The peak radial tear gap appeared at GC6 and GC44, and the tear gap remained at a high level from GC30-GC60.
Radial tears should be considered for repair, and reinforced sutures should be placed on the anterior or middle regions of the meniscus. Greater attention should be given to the dynamic biomechanical effects on the knee joint during preoperative diagnosis and postoperative rehabilitation.
半月板撕裂会改变膝关节的生物力学环境,并可能加速骨关节炎的发展。本研究的目的是探讨不同内侧半月板撕裂位置和撕裂间隙在行走过程中对膝关节的动态生物力学影响。
构建了七个膝关节有限元模型,包括完整内侧半月板(IMM)、内侧半月板前、中、后三分之一区域的放射状稳定撕裂(RSTA、RSTM、RSTP)以及相应的不稳定撕裂(RUTA、RUTM、RUTP)。这七个模型施加了1000 N的轴向静载荷和ISO14243-1标准定义的人体行走载荷。
与静载下的结果相比,内外侧间室的轴向载荷比重新分布(范围为0.7:1至2.9:1)。动态分析时,应力集中在外侧间室的中后部,而非内侧间室的前部和中部。与IMM相比,RUTA、RUTM和RSTM模型中内侧半月板的最大冯·米塞斯应力增加了约24.68% - 57.14%,在放射状撕裂两侧的环向应力中观察到更大差异。放射状撕裂间隙峰值出现在GC6和GC44,并且从GC30 - GC60撕裂间隙保持在较高水平。
应考虑对放射状撕裂进行修复,并在半月板的前部或中部放置加强缝线。在术前诊断和术后康复过程中,应更加关注对膝关节的动态生物力学影响。