• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症临床试验期间患者及照料者对照料贡献的认知:一项混合方法研究

Patient and Caregiver Perceptions of Caregiving Contributions During Cancer Clinical Trials: A Mixed-Methods Study.

作者信息

Cerutti Janine, Lent Maria C, Holcombe Randall F, Reblin Maija

机构信息

Department of Psychological Science, The University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA.

University of Vermont Cancer Center, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Med. 2025 Jan;14(1):e70488. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70488.

DOI:10.1002/cam4.70488
PMID:39781576
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11712184/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Caregivers play crucial roles in cancer treatment and outcomes. However, little is known regarding how caregivers support patients during cancer clinical trials. The aim of this study was to gain insight into the caregiver experience of rural and urban patients enrolled in cancer clinical trials.

METHODS

As part of a quality improvement study, 21 patient-caregiver dyads were interviewed using closed and open-ended interview questions. We analyzed quantitative and qualitative data on patient and caregiver perceptions of caregiver contributions and explored differences in the reported caregiving experience between rural and urban participants.

RESULTS

While patient-caregiver dyads showed significant disagreement in the symptoms/medication management domain, with caregivers tending to acknowledge the contribution while patients did not (χ (1, 21) = 5.82, p = 0.016), both groups generally showed agreement in their perceptions of caregiver involvement and reported similar levels of involvement across the other six assessed domains. Qualitative analysis revealed three themes: patient independence, invisible support, and accepted forms of support. Despite patients valuing independence, patients benefited from caregivers' unseen support, and providing emotional support and attending appointments were widely accepted forms of support among patients. No meaningful differences in caregiver contributions were found between rural and urban patient-caregiver dyads.

CONCLUSION

Our study revealed that caregivers are assisting patients in often unseen and underestimated ways during cancer clinical trials, highlighting their multifaceted role. Cancer clinical trials should implement a family-centered approach, especially for rural caregivers, to enhance patient retention and outcomes.

摘要

目的

照顾者在癌症治疗及治疗结果中发挥着关键作用。然而,关于照顾者在癌症临床试验期间如何支持患者,我们所知甚少。本研究的目的是深入了解参与癌症临床试验的农村和城市患者的照顾者体验。

方法

作为一项质量改进研究的一部分,使用封闭式和开放式访谈问题对21对患者-照顾者进行了访谈。我们分析了关于患者和照顾者对照顾者贡献认知的定量和定性数据,并探讨了农村和城市参与者报告的照顾经历的差异。

结果

虽然患者-照顾者在症状/药物管理领域存在显著分歧,照顾者倾向于认可自身贡献而患者则不然(χ(1, 21) = 5.82,p = 0.016),但两组在对照顾者参与的认知上总体上意见一致,并且在其他六个评估领域报告的参与程度相似。定性分析揭示了三个主题:患者独立性、无形支持和可接受的支持形式。尽管患者重视独立性,但他们受益于照顾者无形的支持,并且提供情感支持和陪同就诊是患者中广泛接受的支持形式。农村和城市患者-照顾者之间在照顾者贡献方面未发现有意义的差异。

结论

我们的研究表明,在癌症临床试验期间,照顾者常常以不为人所见且被低估的方式协助患者,凸显了他们多方面的作用。癌症临床试验应采用以家庭为中心的方法,特别是针对农村照顾者,以提高患者留存率和改善治疗结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a8e/11712184/9736ab40e6c0/CAM4-14-e70488-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a8e/11712184/9736ab40e6c0/CAM4-14-e70488-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a8e/11712184/9736ab40e6c0/CAM4-14-e70488-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Patient and Caregiver Perceptions of Caregiving Contributions During Cancer Clinical Trials: A Mixed-Methods Study.癌症临床试验期间患者及照料者对照料贡献的认知:一项混合方法研究
Cancer Med. 2025 Jan;14(1):e70488. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70488.
2
Rural-urban and regional variations in aspects of caregiving, support services and caregiver health in the USA: evidence from a national survey.美国在照顾、支持服务和照顾者健康方面的城乡和地区差异:来自全国调查的证据。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 7;14(10):e081581. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081581.
3
Building on and tailoring to: Adapting a cancer caregiver psychoeducational intervention for rural settings.基于并调整:为农村环境调整癌症护理者心理教育干预措施。
Cancer Med. 2024 Sep;13(17):e70187. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70187.
4
Geographical location as a determinant of caregiver burden: a rural-urban analysis of the informal caregiving, health, and healthcare survey in Ghana.地理位置对照顾者负担的影响:加纳非正式护理、健康和医疗保健调查的城乡分析。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Aug 28;25(1):317. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02562-7.
5
Exploring the influence of Internet-based caregiver support on experiences of isolation for older spouse caregivers in rural areas: a qualitative interview study.探究基于互联网的照护者支持对农村地区老年配偶照护者孤独体验的影响:一项质性访谈研究
Int J Older People Nurs. 2015 Sep;10(3):211-20. doi: 10.1111/opn.12074. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
6
Comparing the experiences of rural and urban family caregivers of the terminally ill.比较农村和城市临终患者家庭照料者的经历。
Rural Remote Health. 2013 Jan-Mar;13(1):2250. Epub 2013 Jan 7.
7
The relationship between geographical and social space and approaches to care among rural and urban caregivers caring for a family member with Dementia: a qualitative study.农村和城市照护者在照顾痴呆症家庭成员方面的地理和社会空间关系及照护方法:一项定性研究。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2017 Dec;12(1):1275107. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2016.1275107. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
8
Place-based, intersectional variation in caregiving patterns and health outcomes among informal caregivers in the United States.美国非正规照护者的照护模式和健康结果存在基于地点的、交叉性的差异。
Front Public Health. 2024 Aug 19;12:1423457. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1423457. eCollection 2024.
9
The impact of a primary brain tumor diagnosis on caregivers: Insights from the patients' perspective.原发性脑肿瘤诊断对照顾者的影响:来自患者视角的见解。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Aug 19;32(9):595. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08783-x.
10
"I'm not the one with cancer but it's affecting me just as much": A qualitative study of rural caregivers' experiences seeking and accessing support for their health and wellbeing while caring for someone with cancer.“我虽然没有得癌症,但它对我的影响同样大”:一项定性研究,探讨农村照顾者在照顾癌症患者的同时,为自己的健康和福祉寻求和获得支持的经历。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Oct 31;32(11):761. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08947-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Racial and Ethnic Inequities in US Oncology Clinical Trial Participation From 2017 to 2022.2017 年至 2022 年美国肿瘤学临床试验参与中的种族和民族不平等。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jul 3;6(7):e2322515. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.22515.
2
Challenges Experienced by Rural Informal Caregivers of Older Adults in the United States: A Scoping Review.美国农村老年人非正式照料者所面临的挑战:范围综述。
J Evid Based Soc Work (2019). 2023 Jul 4;20(4):520-535. doi: 10.1080/26408066.2023.2183102. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
3
Facilitators and Barriers to Older Adult Participation in Cancer Trials: A Qualitative Study Exploring Patient-Caregiver Dyad Congruence.
促进和阻碍老年癌症患者参与临床试验的因素:一项定性研究探索患者-照顾者二元组的一致性。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2023 Jul;19(7):484-492. doi: 10.1200/OP.22.00843. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
4
Inequities Among Cancer Caregivers with Diverse Identities: A Review of the Literature and Future Directions.癌症照顾者身份多样性的不公平现象:文献综述及未来方向。
Curr Oncol Rep. 2023 Jul;25(7):803-812. doi: 10.1007/s11912-023-01415-3. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
5
"If I wasn't in a rural area, I would definitely have more support": social needs identified by rural cancer caregivers and hospital staff.“如果我不在农村地区,我肯定会得到更多的支持”:农村癌症护理人员和医院工作人员提出的社会需求。
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2023;41(4):393-410. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2022.2129547. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
6
Racial and ethnic disparities in cancer caregiver burden and potential sociocultural mediators.癌症照顾者负担的种族和民族差异及潜在的社会文化中介因素。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Nov;30(11):9625-9633. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07367-x. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
7
Unmet supportive care needs of people with advanced cancer and their caregivers: A systematic scoping review.未满足的晚期癌症患者及其照护者的支持性护理需求:系统范围界定综述。
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2022 Aug;176:103728. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103728. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
8
Caregiver Perspectives on the Benefits, Burdens, and Moral Distress of Participation in Cancer Clinical Trials.照顾者对参与癌症临床试验的益处、负担及道德困扰的看法。
J Fam Nurs. 2023 Feb;29(1):89-98. doi: 10.1177/10748407221098187. Epub 2022 May 25.
9
Hope and meaning-making in phase 1 oncology trials: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative evidence on patient-participant experiences.希望与意义的探索:一项对肿瘤学 I 期临床试验中患者体验的定性研究的系统综述和主题综合分析。
Trials. 2022 May 16;23(1):409. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06306-9.
10
Why do they care? A qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis of personal and relational motivations for providing informal care.他们为什么关心?提供非正式护理的个人和关系动机的定性系统评价和元综合。
Health Psychol Rev. 2023 Jun;17(2):344-376. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2022.2058581. Epub 2022 Apr 6.